Using infrared cameras and skunk lure to monitor swift fox (Vulpes velox)

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marty R. Stratman ◽  
Jerry A. Apker
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Albrecht ◽  
Matt Peek

We examined the effectiveness of simulated underground utility cable markers in hiding infrared cameras along a roadway. Our study took place in the summer of 2014 and winter of 2015 as part of a survey to determine whether swift fox (Vulpes velox) were present along the route of a planned highway expansion project in western Nebraska. Camera covers were constructed of square vinyl posts modified to conceal and camouflage the camera, and used in conjunction with a scent attractant. Camera stations were placed approximately 1.6 km apart and ran for 5 nights along a 200 km stretch of the planned construction site. There were 2,135 trap nights in the study. No camouflaged cameras were taken or disturbed in any way. The only camera placed along the roadway during the survey that was not placed in one of our covers was cable-locked to a utility pole. It was stolen within 3 days. By allowing cameras to remain in the right-of-way (ROW), obtaining access to place the cameras was greatly facilitated in many areas. The cost per camera cover was approximately $20. We conclude this method of disguising cameras is an effective one for roadside use.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Albrecht ◽  
Matt Peek

We examined the effectiveness of simulated underground utility cable markers in hiding infrared cameras along a roadway. Our study took place in the summer of 2014 and winter of 2015 as part of a survey to determine whether swift fox (Vulpes velox) were present along the route of a planned highway expansion project in western Nebraska. Camera covers were constructed of square vinyl posts modified to conceal and camouflage the camera, and used in conjunction with a scent attractant. Camera stations were placed approximately 1.6 km apart and ran for 5 nights along a 200 km stretch of the planned construction site. There were 2,135 trap nights in the study. No camouflaged cameras were taken or disturbed in any way. The only camera placed along the roadway during the survey that was not placed in one of our covers was cable-locked to a utility pole. It was stolen within 3 days. By allowing cameras to remain in the right-of-way (ROW), obtaining access to place the cameras was greatly facilitated in many areas. The cost per camera cover was approximately $20. We conclude this method of disguising cameras is an effective one for roadside use.


2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donelle L. Schwalm ◽  
Warren B. Ballard ◽  
Ernest B. Fish ◽  
Heather A. Whitlaw
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 2024-2029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis L Olson ◽  
Frederick G Lindzey

We monitored dispersion patterns of swift foxes (Vulpes velox) for 3 years in shrub-grassland habitats on the margin of the species' geographic range near Medicine Bow, Wyoming. Annual home-range size was 18.6 ± 1.6 km2 (mean ± SE, n = 13) and was similar to home-range estimates reported in other studies conducted within grassland habitats in other portions of the species' geographic range. Male home ranges were larger than those of their mates during pup-rearing periods (P < 0.04) but were similar in size during the dispersal period. The home ranges of both sexes were smallest during the pup-rearing period. The degree of home-range overlap for mates (biological periods combined) was high (range = 27.4–100%, mean ± SE = 70.8 ± 0.03%, n = 26 pairs) but was minimal between adjacent pairs (range = 0.2–36%, mean ± SE = 11.9 ± 2.4%, n = 10 pairs), suggesting territorial behavior. Occupied home ranges were distributed similarly each year despite one or both pair members often being new. Swift fox home-range size varied seasonally, and home-range dispersion patterns appeared to be influenced by the presence of other fox pairs and the recent use of an area by other swift foxes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 596-600
Author(s):  
Shambhunath Choudhary ◽  
Gordon A. Andrews ◽  
James W. Carpenter

1980 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Moore ◽  
N. S. Martin
Keyword(s):  

Oryx ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Zoe Paraskevopoulou ◽  
Hila Shamon ◽  
Melissa Songer ◽  
Graeme Ruxton ◽  
William J. McShea

Abstract Reintroductions are challenging, and success rates are low despite extensive planning and considerable investment of resources. Improving predictive models for reintroduction planning is critical for achieving successful outcomes. The IUCN Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations recommend that habitat suitability assessments account for abiotic and biotic factors specific to the species to be reintroduced and, where needed, include habitat quality variables. However, habitat assessments are often based on remotely-sensed or existing geographical data that do not always reliably represent habitat quality variables. We tested the contribution of ground-based habitat quality metrics to habitat suitability models using a case study of the swift fox Vulpes velox, a mesocarnivore species for which a reintroduction is planned. Field surveys for habitat quality included collection of data on the main threat to the swift fox (the coyote Canis latrans), and for swift fox prey species. Our findings demonstrated that the inclusion of habitat quality variables derived from field surveys yielded better fitted models and a 16% increase in estimates of suitable habitat. Models including field survey data and models based only on interpolated geographical and remotely-sensed data had little overlap (38%), demonstrating the significant impact that different models can have in determining appropriate locations for a reintroduction. We advocate that ground-based habitat metrics be included in habitat suitability assessments for reintroductions of mesocarnivores.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 922-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Butler ◽  
Kristy L.S. Bly ◽  
Heather Harris ◽  
Robert M. Inman ◽  
Axel Moehrenschlager ◽  
...  

Winter can be a limiting time of year for many temperate species, who must access depressed prey resources to meet energetic demands. The swift fox (Vulpes velox (Say, 1823)) was extirpated from Canada and Montana (USA) by 1969, but was reintroduced in the 1980s to Canada, and subsequently spread into northern Montana. Swift foxes in this region are at the current northern range edge where winter conditions are harsher and persist longer than in their southern range (i.e., Colorado (USA) to Texas (USA)). We collected fine-scale locational data from swift foxes fitted with global positioning system collars to examine movement and resource-use patterns during winter of 2016–2017 in northeastern Montana. Our results suggest that swift foxes displayed three distinct movement patterns (i.e., resting, foraging, and travelling) during the winter. Distance to road decreased relative probability of use by 39%–46% per kilometre across all movement states and individuals, whereas the influence of topographic roughness and distance to crop field varied among movement states and individuals. Overall, while our findings are based on data from three individuals, our study suggests that across movement states during the critical winter season, swift foxes are likely using topography and areas near roads to increase their ability to detect predators.


2003 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Lemons ◽  
Warren B. Ballard ◽  
Robert M. Sullivan ◽  
Marsha A. Sovada

Activity of Swift Foxes (Vulpes velox) at den sites was studied in northwestern Texas during pup rearing seasons in 2000 and 2001 to determine role of males in parental care. Twenty-four percent of radio-collared females with a potential to breed successfully raised pups to eight weeks of age. We intensively monitored presence and absence of male and female Swift Foxes at two den sites each year. Females were present >2.6 times more at den sites than males during the pup rearing season. Female and male Swift Foxes largely stayed at dens during diurnal hours and were active away from dens during nocturnal and crepuscular hours. Females and males spent 12.4% and 3.0% more time at dens before pups emerged, than after pups emerged, respectively. Following depredation of one male parent, the female spent 29% less time at the den site. Decrease in time spent at the den by the female following loss of her mate suggested that loss of one parent might severely impact recruitment of Swift Foxes. Our observations indicated that intense Coyote (Canis latrans) depredation may severely impact pup-rearing success as well as the parental care within Swift Fox family groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document