Reproducibility of Periodontal Probing Using a Conventional Manual and an Automated Force-Controlled Electronic Probe

1995 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Fang Wang ◽  
Knut N. Leknes ◽  
Grenith J. Zimmerman ◽  
Thorarinn J. Sigurdsson ◽  
Ulf M.E. Wikesjö ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.B. Clark ◽  
I. Magnusson ◽  
Y.Y. Namgung ◽  
M.C.K. Yang

Attachment level has been used as the "gold standard" for assessment of the progression of periodontal disease. However, the measurement of attachment level by periodontal probing can be subject to a large number of error sources. Recently, we have designed experiments by using an electronic probe to identify the magnitude of error components due to the instrument, gingival tissue condition, position or probing angle, and time interval between replicate probings. Even with a very careful clinical setting, a few percent of uncontrollable large errors or outliers could not be avoided. A previously used 'option-3' probing scheme to reduce the unexpected large error is justified from the mathematical viewpoint.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-166
Author(s):  
Alexandra Martu ◽  
C. Popa ◽  
I.A. Luchian ◽  
Ioana Martu ◽  
Cornelia Oanta ◽  
...  

SummaryBackground: The periodontal probing has an important role in clinical examination of the periodontal status; different types of periodontal probes have been described. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate comparatively the efficiency of periodontal probing with conventional periodontal probe and electronic periodontal probe.Material and Methods: We examined 57 patients, each patient being subjected to conventional and electronic probing. We assessed the tolerance degree for each probing type and also the time consumed by probing and periodontal charting.Results: The periodontal probing with the electronic probe revealed superior results regarding the accuracy of the measurements, the tolerance level and the time consumed.Conclusions: The electronic periodontal probing is an exceptionally accurate method in establishing diagnosis and assessing treatment results. The electronic periodontal probe represents an efficient and useful tool for measurements of the gingival sulcus and periodontal pockets, and also for determination of the periodontal risk.


2010 ◽  
Vol 72 (08/09) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Holtfreter ◽  
A Greinacher ◽  
T Ittermann ◽  
D Gätke ◽  
T Kocher

1993 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Quirynen ◽  
Ann Callens ◽  
Daniel van Steenberghe ◽  
Marken Nys

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwthar Nassar A Al Shayeb ◽  
Wendy Turner ◽  
David G Gillam

Periodontal probes are the main instruments that are used to assess the status of the periodontium, either for screening purposes or to evaluate periodontal changes throughout the treatment process. With increased knowledge and understanding of periodontal disease, the probes have evolved from a unidimensional manual shape into a more sophisticated computerised instrument. This is due to the need to increase the accuracy and reproducibility of readings and to improve efficiency (time, effort, money). Each probe has characteristic features that makes it unique and, in some cases, specific and limited to use. The aim of this paper is to present a brief introduction to periodontal disease and the methodology of measuring it, followed by probing limitations. The paper will also discuss the methodology of reducing probing error, examiner calibration and probing reproducibility.


2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
pp. 1371-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Graetz ◽  
Anna Plaumann ◽  
Jan-Frederik Wiebe ◽  
Claudia Springer ◽  
Sonja Sälzer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document