Comparison Between Subtraction Radiography and Conventional Radiographic Interpretation During Long-Term Evaluation of Periodontal Therapy in Class II Furcation Defects

2004 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
pp. 1145-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia R. Cury ◽  
Ney S. Araujo ◽  
Jon Bowie ◽  
Enilson A. Sallum ◽  
Marjorie K. Jeffcoat
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Furcation Defects ◽  
Term Evaluation ◽  
Radiographic Interpretation

Long-Term Evaluation of Periodontal Therapy: II. Incidence of Sites Breaking Down

1996 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne B. Kaldahl ◽  
Kenneth L. Kalkwarf ◽  
Kashinath D. Patil ◽  
Michael P. Molvar ◽  
John K. Dyer
Keyword(s):  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Term Evaluation

scholarly journals Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Caprioglio ◽  
Mattia Fontana ◽  
Elena Longoni ◽  
Mauro Cozzani
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Individual Growth ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Changes ◽  
Growth Increase ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Term Evaluation ◽  
Long Term Observation

ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the molar movements and skeletal changes associated with Pendulum-fixed appliance treatment and the long-term postretention period. Subjects and Methods: The treatment sample consisted of 76 Class II patients, 35 males and 41 females. Lateral cephalograms were obtained at the start of treatment (T1); the end of distalization (T2); the end of orthodontic fixed appliance therapy (T3); and long-term observation (7 years 2 months later; T4). Mean age was 12 years 11 months at T1, 13 years 8 months at T2, 15 years 4 months at T3, and 22 years 5 months at T4. The average amount of Class II molar relationship was 3.1 mm, with a mean overjet of 5.9 mm at the beginning of treatment. A paired t-test was used to identify significant between-group differences between T2–T4 and T3–T4. Results: Distal molar movement was obtained during the distalization phase (T2), and more than half of the distalizing effect was maintained at the end of maxillary growth (T4). Most of the relapse occurred during fixed appliance therapy (T3), whereas no significant change was detected in the postretention period (T4). The molar relationship did not show any significant difference between T2 and T4. The vertical facial dimension increased during the distalization phase (T2) and fixed appliance therapy (T3) but returned to the initial values during the postretention period (T4). Conclusions: The Pendulum appliance induces significant dentoalveolar effects, which can be partially maintained during the long-term period. The Class I molar relationship does not change during completion of individual growth. Increase in vertical facial dimension represents a temporary effect.

Long-Term Evaluation of Periodontal Therapy: I. Response to 4 Therapeutic Modalities

1996 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne B. Kaldahl ◽  
Kenneth L. Kalkwarf ◽  
Kashinath D. Patil ◽  
Michael P. Molvar ◽  
John K. Dyer
Keyword(s):  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Term Evaluation

Effect of periodontitis history on implant success: a long-term evaluation during supportive periodontal therapy in a university setting

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Graetz ◽  
Karim Fawzy El-Sayed ◽  
Antje Geiken ◽  
Anna Plaumann ◽  
Sonja Sälzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Supportive Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Term Evaluation ◽  
University Setting

Long-term Evaluation of Treated Class II Division 1 Malocclusions Utilizing the PAR Index

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. D. Otuyemi ◽  
S. P. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Anterior Crowding ◽  
Treatment Standard ◽  
Par Index ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Term Evaluation ◽  
High Treatment ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The PAR Index was used to evaluate treatment and long-term post-retention results obtained from 50 Class II division 1 malocclusions. Dental casts were used to record the occlusions pre- and post-treatment as well as 1 and 10 years post-retention. The results suggested a high treatment standard, as indicated by mean percentage PAR score reduction. However, maintenance of post-treatment results 1 and 10 years post-retention was only achieved in 60 and 38 per cent of cases, respectively. The major factor involved in this deterioration appeared to be late lower anterior crowding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document