scholarly journals The Emergence Of Specialty Medical Homes In The U.S. Health Care System: Initial Financial Performance Data & The Financial Implications For Provider Organizations

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
James Mackie ◽  
Monica Oss

The U.S. health care system is in the midst of significant change in both service delivery model and financing.     Rising costs are driving payers – public and private alike – to rethink the current financing and care management strategies.  One significant shift in policy is around the structure of care coordination for insured individuals – particularly individuals with complex health service and social support needs.  These individuals, while small in number, are responsible for a large proportion of health care spending.   Traditionally, the care of individuals with complex conditions has been left to a wide range of medical specialists – and rarely been coordinated across all specialties.  But in the past four years, health payers have moved toward ‘integrating’ care coordination with a health care team responsible for all services regardless of specialty. This integrated care coordination model  – referred to as a medical home – has been rapidly adopted by many payers.  And, a specialized version of the medical home model – referred to as a heatlh home or specialty medical home – has been developed for consumers with complex needs.  The model has changed both the relationship of the insured individual to the payer and to their medical specialists. It is early in the adoption of specialty medical homes and two key financial questions are yet unanswered.  The first, do specialty medical homes reduce health care spending for complex consumers.  The second, what are the financial implications of a specialty medical home model for heatlh care provider organizations.  This research examines the available research literature and other published data for preliminary answers to these questions of financial impact of this emerging heatlh care system model. 

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 998-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Scheuter ◽  
Danielle H Rochlin ◽  
Chuan-Mei Lee ◽  
Arnold Milstein ◽  
Robert M Kaplan

Abstract Acute alcohol intoxication is responsible for a sizable share of emergency department visits. Intoxicated individuals without other medical needs may not require the high level of care provided by an emergency department. We estimate the impact on U.S. health care spending if individuals with uncomplicated, acute alcohol intoxication were treated in sobering centers instead of the emergency department. We performed a budget impact analysis from the perspective of the U.S. health care system based on published and gray literature reports. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Monte Carlo modeling with random variation for three variables (cost of an emergency department visit, cost of a sobering center visit, and start-up costs per sobering center visit) and the percentage of cases diverted from emergency departments to sobering centers. Outcomes were expressed in terms of national savings in 2017 U.S. dollars. Assuming a diversion rate of 50% based on previous studies, national savings range from $230 million to $1.0 billion annually. In the Monte Carlo modeling, we found annual national savings of $99.02 million (95% CI: $95.89–$102.19 million), $792.34 million (95% CI: $767.09–$817.58 million), and $1,185.51 million (95% CI: $1,150.64–$1,226.37 million) with diversion rates of 5%, 40%, and 60%, respectively. Implementing sobering centers as a treatment alternative for individuals with uncomplicated acute alcohol intoxication could yield substantial cost savings for the U.S. health care system.


Author(s):  
David Sarokin ◽  
Jay Schulkin

The U.S. health care system is driven as much by centralized bureaucracies as by market dynamics and suffers from information shortcomings as a result. Neither patients nor healthcare providers have access to good information, leading to a highly inefficient system. Better systems for rating doctors and hospitals and for understanding health care spending are beginning to emerge and can be accelerated.


2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
KEVIN GRUMBACH ◽  
ROBERT MOFFIT

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
KEVIN GRUMBACH ◽  
ROBERT MOFFIT

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
KEVIN GRUMBACH ◽  
ROBERT MOFFIT

1999 ◽  
Vol 25 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 387-402
Author(s):  
Arti K. Rai

Over the last few decades, the U.S. health care system has been the beneficiary of tremendous growth in the power and sheer quantity of useful medical technology. As a consequence, our society has, for some time, had to make cost-benefit tradeoffs in health care. The alternative—funding all health care interventions that would produce some health benefit for some patient—is not feasible, because it would effectively consume all of our resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document