scholarly journals User Views On The Complex Accounting For Financial Instruments

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chyi Woan Tan ◽  
Greg Tower ◽  
Phil Hancock ◽  
Ross Taplin
Keyword(s):  
User Experience ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
User Preferences ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
General Support ◽  
Accounting Model ◽  
Topical Area

This paper examines Australian and Singaporean users views on fair value accounting for all financial instruments in financial institutions via a survey on various aspects of contention in this debate. Overall, users showed general support for fair value accounting for all financial instruments. In addition, the findings revealed that users will support fair value accounting so long as there is no perceived difference between the banking and trading books, fair values of non-traded financial instruments are reliable and volatility in earnings will not be misunderstood. It was also found that user experience increases the level of support for the proposed fair value accounting model. These results highlight actual user preferences with noticeable support for arguments from both sides of the debate (JWG and JWGBA) in this highly contentious and topical area of accounting for financial instruments.

Issues and challenges of IFRS 9 in Malaysian Islamic financial institutions: recognition criteria perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-257
Author(s):  
Marziana Madah Marzuki ◽  
Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman ◽  
Ainulashikin Marzuki ◽  
Nathasa Mazna Ramli ◽  
Wan Amalina Wan Abdullah
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Reporting Framework ◽  
Islamic Financial Institutions ◽  
Ifrs 9

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects and challenges of the new amendment of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 9 in Malaysia from the perspectives of regulators, auditors, accountants and academicians in Malaysian Islamic financial institutions. For the purpose of this study, this paper focuses on the recognition criteria perspective of the standard, which provides a basic understanding of the financial reporting framework. Design/methodology/approach Using 10 series of semi-structured interviews undertaken with key individuals in regulatory bodies, audit companies, full-fledged Malaysian Islamic Banks and Malaysian higher learning institutions. Findings The findings revealed that IFRS 9 strengthens International Accounting Standards 39 in terms of relevance and reliability, recognition of financial instruments and identification of business models. Nevertheless, Islamic financial institutions face challenges in terms of a faithful representation of fair value, substance over form, identification of financial instruments before recognition criteria and the extent of the role of risk management in reducing manipulation in identifying business models. Research limitations/implications This study provides implications to regulators and standard setters in Malaysia to enhance the quality of financial reporting framework and practices in Islamic financial institutions in this country using IFRS 9. Practical implications Practically, the findings of this study can be used by the regulators to resolve the issues that arise in adopting IFRS 9 among Islamic financial institutions to further enhance financial reporting quality. Originality/value The findings of this study are very important to ensure that the adoption of IFRS among Islamic financial institutions are in line with Sharīʿah principles. To date, no studies have been done on the challenges of adopting IFRS 9 among Islamic financial institutions in Malaysia.

Fair value accounting choice

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inês Pinto ◽  
Manuel Caldeira Pais
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Accounting Conservatism ◽  
Accounting Choice ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
Asset Value ◽  
Accounting Model ◽  
The Impact

Purpose – Profiting from a unique research opportunity in the Portuguese REIFs market, this paper aims to investigate the impact of fund managers ' accounting choice on funds ' returns distribution and analyses the relationship between fair value accounting choice and conditional accounting conservatism. Design/methodology/approach – According to Portuguese securities market regulation, fund managers of REIFs can fix the value of the fund properties between the acquisition cost and the average of the appraisal values assigned periodically by two independent appraisers. Therefore, through the analysis of fund managers’ actual choice to value REIF net asset value in comparison with a mandatory adoption of a pure fair value method (appraisers’ valuations), the paper investigates the impact of accounting choice on funds’ return series. On the other hand, an analysis at fund level is also conducted to determine the consequences of fair value accounting choice on the ability of fund managers in delaying the recognition of asset value decreases (bad news). Findings – Results indicate that in the period of financial crisis, significant differences in REIF returns according to the accounting method used to value properties are observed. There is also evidence that fund managers of open-end funds that are subject to greater market pressure to meet financial reporting objectives are more likely to smooth book value returns. Additionally, findings support the hypothesis that REIFs that use a more historical cost accounting model exhibit a lower degree of conditional accounting conservatism, suggesting that the use of fair value may be useful to reduce fund manager discretion in delaying the recognition of losses. Originality/value – This paper provides an empirical evidence of one possible positive effect of the use of fair value on the quality of financial reporting, evidencing how a more fair value accounting model may limit fund managers’ discretion.

scholarly journals The Critical Aspect on Fair Value Accounting And Its Implication To Islamic Financial Institutions.

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-304
Author(s):  
Jamaluddin Majid ◽  
Safri Haliding
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Critical Aspect ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Historical Cost ◽  
Accounting Measurement ◽  
Islamic Financial Institutions ◽  
Value Measurement ◽  
Critical Aspects

The Critical Aspect on Fair Value Accounting And Its Implication To Islamic Financial Institutions. Fair value accounting (FVA) paradigm replaced the historical cost accounting (HCA) in the development of accounting standards that FVA is more relevant that HCA probably did not provide the real financial and income information. This paper tries to explore critical aspects of the fair value accounting and its implications to Islamic Financial Institutions implications. This study concludes that that fair value accounting measurement provides many critical aspects to be implemented to Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs). AAOIFI proposed cash equivalent value as respond to fair value measurement that cash equivalent value when the attribute condition are present such as the relevance, reliability and understandability of the resulting information  DOI:10.15408/aiq.v6i2.1236

scholarly journals Fair value accounting and earning management: The impact of unobservable inputs on earning quality. Evidence from the US

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Pompili ◽  
Marco Tutino
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Earning Quality ◽  
The Impact

Accounting standard boards (IASB and FASB) are aimed at designing high-quality standards able to increase transparency and comparability of financial reporting. They have chosen fair value accounting (FVA) approach to improve the quality of financial reporting and at the same time help financial reporting users in the decision-making process. During recent years, an intense debate has arisen about the trade-off between relevance and reliability of accounting information using this approach. Many authors outline problems related to the fair value hierarchy valuation of financial instruments, in particular, the discretionary use of unobservable inputs in financial instruments valuation process in support of earnings management. Tutino and Pompili (2018) have identified a general negative correlation between the extent of FVA and earning quality. Stating this, the main objective of the paper, using the same approach of the previous one, is to identify the specific impacts of unobservable inputs on earning quality. Theory and previous literature suggest a major negative impact of unobservable inputs than observable ones on the quality of information provided within financial reporting. Results show a negative and strong relationship between FVA and earning quality for US banks that do not depend on the hierarchy of input used in the evaluation process. These results suggest new considerations on the reliability of fair value concerning the possibilities of manipulation given to the management with this approach.

Fair Value Accounting for Financial Instruments: Does It Improve the Association between Bank Leverage and Credit Risk?

2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1143-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Blankespoor ◽  
Thomas J. Linsmeier ◽  
Kathy R. Petroni ◽  
Catherine Shakespeare
Keyword(s):  
Credit Risk ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Fair Value Accounting

Fair value accounting and the future of financial instruments

Balance Sheet ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 10-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Jackson ◽  
David Lodge
Keyword(s):  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals Fair value accounting and management opportunism on earnings management in banking sector: First evidence

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 59-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Tutino ◽  
Marco Pompili
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Fair Value ◽  
Financial Instruments ◽  
Fair Value Accounting ◽  
Valuation Process ◽  
Earning Quality ◽  
Short Termism

Accounting standard boards (IASB and FASB) have chosen fair value accounting (FVA) approach to help financial reporting users in the decision-making process. During recent years, an intense debate arose about the trade-off between relevance and reliability of accounting information in this approach. Even if fair value based information could be considered highly relevant and helpful from an investor’s perspective, many authors outline problems related to fair value hierarchy valuation of financial instruments. In particular, the discretionary use of unobservable inputs in financial instruments valuation process can support earnings management strategy underlying the risk for emerging agency problems, moral hazard behaviour and management short-termism. Stating that, after providing a literature review focused on management behaviour related to FVA, the main objective of the paper is identifying possible relationships between FVA valuations and earning quality observing a sample of US and European banks listed in the period 2011-2016 based on Šodan model (Sodan, 2015). Results show a negative and strong relationship between FVA and earning quality for US banks; results for European listed banks do not provide any strong evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document