scholarly journals Estratégia Multidimensional na Redução de Infeção Associada a Cateter Venoso Central em Pediatria

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Jorge Rodrigues ◽  
Andrea Dias ◽  
Guiomar Oliveira ◽  
José Farela Neves
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Group 2

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> To determine the central-line associated bloodstream infection rate after implementation of central venous catheter-care practice bundles and guidelines and to compare it with the previous central-line associated bloodstream infection rate.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> A prospective, longitudinal, observational descriptive study with an exploratory component was performed in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit during five months. The universe was composed of every child admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit who inserted a central venous catheter. A comparative study with historical controls was performed to evaluate the result of the intervention (group 1 <em>versus</em> group 2).<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Seventy five children were included, with a median age of 23 months: 22 (29.3%) newborns; 28 (37.3%) with recent surgery and 32 (43.8%) with underlying illness. A total of 105 central venous catheter were inserted, the majority a single central venous catheter (69.3%), with a mean duration of 6.8 ± 6.7 days. The most common type of central venous catheter was the short-term, non-tunneled central venous catheter (45.7%), while the subclavian and brachial flexure veins were the most frequent insertion sites (both 25.7%). There were no cases of central-line associated bloodstream infection reported during this study. Comparing with historical controls (group 1), both groups were similar regarding age, gender, department of origin and place of central venous catheter insertion. In the current study (group 2), the median length of stay was higher, while the mean duration of central venous catheter (excluding peripherally inserted central line) was similar in both groups. There were no statistical differences regarding central venous catheter caliber and number of lumens. Fewer children admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit had central venous catheter inserted in group 2, with no significant difference between single or multiple central venous catheter.<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> After multidimensional strategy implementation there was no reported central-line associated bloodstream infection<br /><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Efforts must be made to preserve the same degree of multidimensional prevention, in order to confirm the effective reduction of the central-line associated bloodstream infection rate and to allow its maintenance.</p>

Evaluating Central Venous Catheter Care in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 514-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Hatler ◽  
Linda Buckwald ◽  
Zoraida Salas-Allison ◽  
Cathleen Murphy-Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Central Catheters

Background Catheter-related bloodstream infection remains an important health problem for hospitalized children. Although placement of a central venous catheter is a life-saving intervention for critically ill children, these same central catheters are a potential source of infection. Objectives Few studies that directly address care of central venous catheters for children in intensive care units have been reported. This evaluation was designed to describe the extent of evidence-based practices for care of insertion sites of central venous catheters in the pediatric intensive care unit of an urban tertiary care center. Another goal was to determine the influence of 2 different regimens for dressing changes on rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections and costs. Methods A convenience sample and an exploratory design were used to collect data in 2 phases, including 30 days to establish baseline information and 30 days each during which patients received dressing care for a central venous catheter with a transparent dressing alone and with a transparent dressing plus a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing. Nurses also participated in a survey of knowledge about infection control practices related to central catheters. Results Few differences were found between the transparent dressing alone and a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing plus the transparent dressing. A serendipitous finding was the number of times that central catheters were accessed daily. Conclusions The results of this project suggest that infection control efforts may be most appropriately focused on processes rather than on products.

Factors Associated with Time to Acquisition of Bloodstream Infection in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Júlia Gonçalves de Mello ◽  
Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão de Albuquerque ◽  
Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes ◽  
Heloísa Ramos Lacerda ◽  
Eduardo Jaime Seara Ferraz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Factors Associated

Objective.To evaluate the risk factors that influence time to acquisition of a laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection (LCBI).Design.Prospective cohort study with an 18-month follow-up.Setting.A 16-bed medical and/or surgical pediatric intensive care unit that cares for patients of the Brazilian Public Health System exclusively.Patients.We included children from 0 to 18 years old who were represented by 875 consecutive admissions to the pediatric intensive care unit from January 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. The children from all but 5 (0.6%) of the admissions were followed up until discharge or death. The majority (506 [58.2%]) were hospitalized for surgical pathology, and 254 (29.2%) underwent heart surgery.Methods.We used a standardized questionnaire and data collection from daily charts. Information on risk factors was collected before the onset of first LCBI. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of the variables on the risk of LCBI each day was estimated through a Cox model fitting.Results.Fifty-seven children (6.6%) developed an LCBI, 54 (94.7%) of whom made use of a central venous catheter. LCBI incidence was 11.27 episodes/1,000 patient-days and 17.92 episodes/1,000 patient-days when associated with a central venous catheter. Factors associated with time to the first LCBI in the Cox model were age less than 2 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–3.89), malnutrition (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.01–3.00), use of a central venous catheter (HR, 4.36; 95% CI, 1.30–14.64), use of antibiotics before admission (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33–0.98), and use of transfused blood products (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22–0.74).Conclusion.Factors associated with time to acquisition of LCBI were age less than 2 years, weight-for-age z score less than −2, and the use of a central venous catheter. Therefore, intensification of LCBI prevention efforts in patients with these characteristics is fundamental.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document