scholarly journals Y-TZP surface treatments and their effects on the bond strength to resin cement

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e190918
Author(s):  
Michele Mirian May ◽  
Ana Maria Estivalete Marchionatti ◽  
Luiz Felipe Valandro ◽  
Edson Luiz Foletto ◽  
Lucio Strazzabosco Dorneles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Tetragonal Zirconia ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Universal Primer ◽  
Alumina Particles ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength

Aim: This study evaluated the effect of surface treatments of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramics on their bond strength to a resin cement. Methods: Seventy zirconia blocks (6 × 6 × 2 mm3, IPS e.max ZirCAD) were assigned into 7 groups (n=10) – as-sintered (AS), no treatment; tribochemical silica coating + silanization (TBS; Cojet-sand; ProSil); airabrasion with 45 μm alumina particles + universal primer (AAP; Monobond®Plus); fusion sputtering (FS); SiO2 nanofilm + silanization (SN; ProSil); FS+SN+ silanization (FSSN; ProSil); FS+SN+Universal Primer (FSSNP; Monobond®Plus). Afterwards, a resin cement (RelyX™ ARC) was applied inside cylinders (Ø = 0.96 mm × 1 mm height) placed on the zirconia surfaces. Microshear bond strength tests (μSBS) were carried out (1 mm/min). Failure and phase transformation analysis were performed. Bond strength data (MPa) were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis/Mann Whitney tests. Results: TBS (27 ± 1.2) and AAP (24.7 ± 0.8) showed higher bond strengths than the other groups, followed by FSSNP (15.5 ± 4.2) and FSSN (13.3 ± 3.6). FS (3.4 ± 0.44) and SN (9.5 ± 2.7) showed the lowest values (p < 0.001). Most of the specimens exhibited an adhesive failure. Conclusion: Air-abrasion by silica-coated alumina particles followed by silanization or by alumina particles followed by universal primer resulted in the highest resin bond strength to zirconia. Fusion sputtering and silica nanofilm deposition induced low strengths. However, when these methods are applied in combination and with a primer (FSSN and FSSNP), higher bond strengths may be achieved. Low bond strengths are obtained when no zirconia treatment is performed.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT RESIN CEMENTS AFTER ZIRCONIA SURFACE TREATMENTS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeliz Hayran ◽  
Süha Kuşçu ◽  
Işıl SARIKAYA
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Cement Type ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Alumina Particles

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of different resin cements after zirconia surface treatments. Materials & Methods: A total of 60 zirconia discs (3x7mm) were prepared and divided into 3 main groups according to the surface treatments as control (C), sandblasting (SB), and tribochemical silica coating (TC). Main groups were divided into two subgroups according to two different resin cements were applied. No surface treatment was applied to the samples in C group. 50μm Al2O3 particles were applied to the samples in SB group for 10 s at a distance of 10 mm under 4 atm. TC group were tribochemically coated with alumina particles. Self-adhesive resin (ME) and multi-system dual-cure adhesive resin (NX3) was applied to the subgroups. After cementation, all samples were tested for SBS. SBS values were statistically analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Regardless of the cement type, SBS values of the surface treated samples were statistically different (p <0.001). Group SB was determined as the group with the highest SBS value. This group was followed by Group C and Group TC, respectively. The SBS values of the samples according to the resin cements and surface treatments were statistically significantly different (p<0.001). SBS values of the samples cemented with NX3 resin cement were found to be higher than the samples treated with ME resin cement. Conclusion: SB increased resin bond to zirconia. It is more advantageous to use multi-system dual cure adhesive cements in zirconia cementation.

scholarly journals Influence of Surface Treatments and Adhesive Systems on Lithium Disilicate Microshear Bond Strength

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Celso Sebastião Garboza ◽  
Sandrine Bittencourt Berger ◽  
Ricardo Danil Guiraldo ◽  
Ana Paula Piovezan Fugolin ◽  
Alcides Gonini-Júnior ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Plastic Tube ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength of ceramic prosthetic structures reinforced by lithium disilicate cemented with resin cement under conditions of different surface treatments and adhesive systems. Seventy-two rectangular blocks of lithium disilicate (6.5 mm long × 5 mm wide × 1 mm thick) were fabricated, air abraded with 50-μm Al2O3 particles and divided into six groups (n=12) depending on the surface pretreatments. The groups were as follows: 10HF/S/SBM: 10% hydrofluoric acid etched for 20 s (10HF) + silane (S) + Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBM); 10HF/S/SB: 10HF + S + Single Bond Universal (SB); 10HF/SBM; 10HF/SB; S/SBM and S/SB. Two 1-mm-long plastic tubes were placed on the specimens, filled with RelyX ARC resin cement and cured for 20 s per tube. The plastic tube was removed, and the microshear bond strength was tested. Data were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey's tests (α=0.05). Fractured specimens were observed under optical microscopy. For both adhesives, the bond strengths (MPa) of groups treated with acid-etching and silane (10HF/S/SB: 24.82, 10HF/S/SBM: 24.90) were higher (p<0.001) than those of groups treated with acid-etching (10HF/SB: 16.47, 10HF/SBM: 19.94) only or only silane (S/SB: 18.42, S/SBM: 13.24). All groups showed a predominance of failure adhesive. The silanization should be a clinical step in cementing ceramic structures reinforced by lithium disilicate, even with the application of universal adhesive that contains silane in its formulation.

Effect of Adhesive Cementation Strategies on the Bonding of Y-TZP to Human Dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
MLL Alves ◽  
F Campos ◽  
CD Bergoli ◽  
MA Bottino ◽  
M Özcan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Cement Type ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Universal Primer ◽  
Surface Conditioning

SUMMARY This study evaluated the effects of different adhesive strategies on the adhesion of zirconia to dentin using conventional and self-adhesive cements and their corresponding adhesive resins. The occlusal parts of human molars (N=80) were sectioned, exposing the dentin. The teeth and zirconia cylinders (N=80) (diameter=3.4 mm; height=4 mm) were randomly divided into eight groups according to the factors “surface conditioning” and “cement type” (n=10 per group). One conventional cement (CC: RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE) and one self-adhesive cement (SA: RelyX U200, 3M ESPE) and their corresponding adhesive resin (for CC, Adper Single Bond Plus; for SA, Scotchbond Universal Adhesive-SU) were applied on dentin. Zirconia specimens were conditioned either using chairside (CJ: CoJet, 30 μm, 2.5 bar, four seconds), laboratory silica coating (RC: Rocatec, 110 μm, 2.5 bar, four seconds), or universal primer (Single Bond Universal-UP). Nonconditioned groups for both cements acted as the control (C). Specimens were stored in water (37°C, 30 days) and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) testing (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and a Tukey test (α=0.05). While surface conditioning significantly affected the SBS values (p=0.0001) (C&lt;RC=CJ=UP), cement type did not (p=0.148) (CC=SA). The interaction terms were significant (p=0.014). Failure types were predominantly adhesive. Air-abrasion and the use of the universal primer improved the bond strength of zirconia to dentin compared to the control group, regardless of the type of resin cement used.

Effects of Multipurpose, Universal Adhesives on Resin Bonding to Zirconia Ceramic

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
J-H Kim ◽  
S-Y Chae ◽  
Y Lee ◽  
G-J Han ◽  
B-H Cho
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Artificial Aging ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Universal Adhesives ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Cylinders

SUMMARY This study evaluated the effects of single-bottle, multipurpose, universal adhesives on the bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic. Polished zirconia ceramic (Cercon base) discs were randomly divided into four groups (n=40) according to the applied surface-conditioning agent: Single Bond 2, Single Bond Universal, All-Bond Universal, and Alloy Primer. Cured composite cylinders (Ø 0.8 mm × 1 mm) were cemented to the conditioned zirconia specimens with resin cement (RelyX ARC). The bonded specimens were subjected to a microshear bond-strength test after 24 hours of water storage and after 10,000 cycles of thermocycling. The surface-conditioning agent significantly influenced the bond strength (p&lt;0.05). Single Bond Universal showed the highest initial bond strength (37.7 ± 5.1 MPa), followed by All-Bond Universal (31.3 ± 5.6 MPa), Alloy Primer (26.9 ± 5.1 MPa), and Single Bond 2 (8.5 ± 4.6 MPa). Artificial aging significantly reduced the bond strengths of all the test groups (p&lt;0.05). After 10,000 cycles of thermocycling, All-Bond Universal showed the highest bond-strength value (26.9 ± 6.4 MPa). Regardless of artificial aging, Single Bond Universal and All-Bond Universal showed significantly higher bond strengths than Alloy Primer, a conventional metal primer.

The Effect of Ceramic Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite Resin to All-Ceramic Coping Materials

2007 ◽  
Vol 330-332 ◽  
pp. 1365-1368
Author(s):  
W.H. Kim ◽  
H.J. Lee ◽  
Keun Woo Lee ◽  
Kwang Mahn Kim ◽  
Kyoung Nam Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Dental Composite ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Alumina Particles

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to 4 different all-ceramic coping materials with 3 different surface treatments after thermocycling and without thermocycling. Three different surface treatments - sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles (AB); sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles and acid etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid (AE); sandblasting with 50 ㎛ alumina particles and 30 ㎛ alumina particles with tribochemical silica coating (SI) and silane application - were used on four different all-ceramic; Feldspatic ceramic (Duceram Plus); Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS Empress2); Alumica ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina); Zirconia ceramic (Zi-Ceram) - substrates. Shear bond strength of restorative composite resin to substrate was tested after thermocycling and without thermocycling (n=10). Each specimen was subjected to a shear load at a crosshead speed of 2 ㎜/min until fracture. Two-way analysis of variance and Duncan multiple comparison test (α =0.05) were used to analyze the bond strength values. There were significant differences in the bond strengths for ceramic types (P<.001), surface treatments (P<.001), and thermocycling (P<.001). The Duncan analysis showed that the Si specimens had significantly higher bonding strengths than other specimens. The bond strength of composite resin decreased after thermocycling.

The Effect of Tribochemical Silica Coating on the Microshear Bond Strength of Translucent Zirconia to Resin Cement

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (14) ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
Soha Osama Nabih ◽  
Jihan Farouk Mohamed Younis ◽  
Tarek Salah Morsi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength

The Effect of Sandblasting and Different Primers on Shear Bond Strength Between Yttria-tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal Ceramic and a Self-adhesive Resin Cement

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y-A Yi ◽  
J-S Ahn ◽  
Y-J Park ◽  
S-H Jun ◽  
I-B Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Tetragonal Zirconia ◽  
Xrd Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Multiple Comparison Test ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal

SUMMARY Purpose To evaluate the effect of zirconia primers, air-abrasion, and tribochemical surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramic and self-adhesive resin cement. Methods and Materials Y-TZP ceramic surfaces were ground flat with 600-grit silicon carbide paper and then divided into seven groups of 10 and treated as follows: untreated (control), Monobond Plus, Z-PRIME Plus, ESPE Sil with CoJet, air-abrasion, Monobond Plus with air-abrasion, and Z-PRIME Plus with air-abrasion. Self-adhesive resin cement was placed onto the treated Y-TZP specimens for each group. All specimens were thermocycled and subjected to a shear bond strength test. Scanning electron microscope images of the fractured areas and x-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the surface-treated Y-TZP specimens were performed. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test (p&lt;0.05). Results The Z-PRIME Plus treatment in combination with air-abrasion produced the highest bond strength (16.50±2.26 MPa), followed by air-abrasion (10.56±3.32 MPa), and then Monobond Plus combined with air-abrasion (8.93±3.13 MPa), ESPE Sil after CoJet application (8.54±3.98 MPa), and the Z-PRIME Plus group (8.27±2.79 MPa). The control (3.91±0.72 MPa) and Monobond Plus (4.86±1.77 MPa) groups indicated the lowest results (p&lt;0.05). The XRD results showed the peaks of the monoclinic phase for the air-abrasion and CoJet treatment groups compared with the Y-TZP control. Conclusion Z-PRIME Plus primer application after air-abrasion presented the best results for improving the bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and self-adhesive resin cement.

scholarly journals Bonding of Y-TZP to Dentin: Effects of Y-TZP Surface Conditioning, Resin Cement Type, and Aging

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Bottino ◽  
C Bergoli ◽  
EG Lima ◽  
SMS Marocho ◽  
RO Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Tetragonal Zirconia ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Occlusal Plane ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal

SUMMARY Purpose To evaluate the effects of two surface treatments, aging, and two resin cements on shear bond strength between dentin and yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic (Y-TZP). Materials and Methods Eighty human molars were embedded in acrylic resin and sectioned 3 mm below the occlusal plane. These teeth and 80 cylindrical Y-TZP specimens (height, 4 mm; diameter, 3.4 mm) were divided into eight groups (n=10) using the following factors: Y-TZP surface treatment (Vi: low-fusing porcelain [vitrification] + hydrofluoric acid etching + silanization or Si: tribochemical silicatization); cementation strategies (PF: Panavia or CC: Clearfil); and storage (nonaging or aging). Bonding surfaces of 40 Y-TZP specimens received Vi treatment, and the rest received Si treatment. Half of the ceramic-tooth assemblies were cemented with Panavia, the rest with Clearfil. Shear tests were executed using 0.4-mm–thick wire at 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α=0.05). Fractures were analyzed. Results Y-TZP surface treatments did not affect bond strength (p=0.762, Vi = Si), while resin cements (p&lt;0.001, Panavia &gt; Clearfil) and aging (p=0.006, nonaging &gt; aging) showed a significant effect. Most failures were in adhesive at dentin-cement interfaces; no failure occurred between zirconia and cement. Conclusion When Y-TZP ceramic is bonded to dentin, the weakest interface is that between dentin and resin cement. The resin cement/Y-TZP interface was less susceptible to failures, owing to Y-TZP surface treatments.

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of MDP-Containing Self-Adhesive Resin Cement and Y-TZP Ceramics: Effect of Phosphate Monomer-Containing Primers

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Soo Ahn ◽  
Young-Ah Yi ◽  
Yoon Lee ◽  
Deog-Gyu Seo
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Tetragonal Zirconia ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Multiple Comparison Test ◽  
Ceramic Surfaces ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

Purpose. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different phosphate monomer-containing primers on the shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramics and MDP-containing self-adhesive resin cement.Materials and Methods. Y-TZP ceramic surfaces were ground flat with #600-grit SiC paper and divided into six groups (n=10). They were treated as follows: untreated (control), Metal/Zirconia Primer, Z-PRIME Plus, air abrasion, Metal/Zirconia Primer with air abrasion, and Z-PRIME Plus with air abrasion. MDP-containing self-adhesive resin cement was applied to the surface-treated Y-TZP specimens. After thermocycling, a shear bond strength test was performed. The surfaces of the Y-TZP specimens were analyzed under a scanning electron microscope. The bond strength values were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the Student–Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test (P<0.05).Results. The Z-PRIME Plus treatment combined with air abrasion produced the highest bond strength, followed by Z-PRIME Plus application, Metal/Zirconia Primer combined with air abrasion, air abrasion alone, and, lastly, Metal/Zirconia Primer application. The control group yielded the lowest results (P<0.05).Conclusion. The application of MDP-containing primer resulted in increased bond strength between Y-TZP ceramics and MDP-containing self-adhesive resin cements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document