scholarly journals Testing for fecal gluten immunogenic peptides: a useful tool to evaluate compliance with gluten-free diet by celiacs

Author(s):  
Brunetta Porcelli
2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S163
Author(s):  
Emilia Sugai ◽  
Ana Costa ◽  
Ma. de la Paz Temprano ◽  
Sonia I. Niveloni ◽  
Edgardo Smecuol ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-523
Author(s):  
Radim Vyhnánek ◽  
Ziad Khaznadar ◽  
Roman Vyhnánek ◽  
Milan Paulík

Objectives and study: To compare the values of gluten-related immunogenic peptides (GIP) in stool and anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies (anti-tTG IgA) in blood in children newly diagnosed with coeliac disease (CD). Methods: All children (2–15 y) newly diagnosed with CD between May 2018 and May 2020 at our clinic who complied with the inclusion criteria were invited to join the prospective study. During workup for CD, a stool sample to measure GIP was taken together with a blood sample to measure anti-tTG IgA. All newly diagnosed children were invited 4 months later for a check-up. Children and their caregivers were asked about known non-compliance with the gluten-free diet (GFD), a blood sample was taken to measure the anti-tTG IgA, and a stool sample was collected to measure GIP. Blood was evaluated for anti-tTG IgA by ELISA, and the stool was tested by quantitative Sandwich ELISA designed to detect and quantify GIP using the G12 antibody. Values of GIP and anti-tTG IgA were compared in terms of their relation to the upper limit of normal (ULN) of the particular method. Results: 29 children (18 girls) were enrolled in the study. The values of GIP in stool at the time of diagnosis were above the ULN (0.15 µg/g) in all children. Average 4.21, median 3.29, standard deviation (SD) 3.7. After the four months, all but three (89.7%) had values of GIP in the reference range. Average 0.29, median 0.12, SD 0.73. Similarly, anti-tTG IgA values were above the ULN (9.9 U/mL) at the time of diagnosis in all children. Average 164, median 195, SD 49. Although the anti-tTG IgA levels were lower at check-up in all but one child, only 10 (34.5%) showed values within the normal range, with an average of 27.9, median 12.0, and SD 38.9. All children declared strict adherence to GFD. Discussion: Using the GIP concentration in stool, adherence to GFD in our cohort of children is very good, better than that described in literature. Conclusion: Measuring GIP in stool could prove a more sensitive indicator of adherence to GFD in the early months after the diagnosis of CD when anti-tTG IgA are still elevated above the ULN due to their well-described gradual decrease after GFD initiation.


Author(s):  
Gry Irene Skodje ◽  
Frida van Megen ◽  
Marianne Stendahl ◽  
Christine Henriksen ◽  
Knut Erik Aslaksen Lundin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
María Roca ◽  
Ester Donat ◽  
Etna Masip ◽  
Paula Crespo-Escobar ◽  
Antonio José Cañada-Martínez ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
María de Lourdes Moreno ◽  
Ángel Cebolla ◽  
Alba Muñoz-Suano ◽  
Carolina Carrillo-Carrion ◽  
Isabel Comino ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 2274
Author(s):  
Herbert Wieser ◽  
Ángela Ruiz-Carnicer ◽  
Verónica Segura ◽  
Isabel Comino ◽  
Carolina Sousa

Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic gluten-responsive immune mediated enteropathy and is treated with a gluten-free diet (GFD). However, a strict diet for life is not easy due to the ubiquitous nature of gluten. This review aims at examining available evidence on the degree of adherence to a GFD, the methods to assess it, and the barriers to its implementation. The methods for monitoring the adherence to a GFD are comprised of a dietary questionnaire, celiac serology, or clinical symptoms; however, none of these methods generate either a direct or an accurate measure of dietary adherence. A promising advancement is the development of tests that measure gluten immunogenic peptides in stools and urine. Causes of adherence/non-adherence to a GFD are numerous and multifactorial. Inadvertent dietary non-adherence is more frequent than intentional non-adherence. Cross-contamination of gluten-free products with gluten is a major cause of inadvertent non-adherence, while the limited availability, high costs, and poor quality of certified gluten-free products are responsible for intentionally breaking a GFD. Therefore, several studies in the last decade have indicated that many patients with CD who follow a GFD still have difficulty controlling their diet and, therefore, regularly consume enough gluten to trigger symptoms and damage the small intestine.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. e00411
Author(s):  
Chiara Monachesi ◽  
Anil K. Verma ◽  
Giulia N. Catassi ◽  
Elisa Franceschini ◽  
Simona Gatti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document