scholarly journals Development and Field-testing of a Reading Strategy Questionnaire

JLTA Journal ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (0) ◽  
pp. 100-118
Author(s):  
Kiyomi Yoshizawa
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1257-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya Kucheria ◽  
McKay Moore Sohlberg ◽  
Jason Prideaux ◽  
Stephen Fickas

PurposeAn important predictor of postsecondary academic success is an individual's reading comprehension skills. Postsecondary readers apply a wide range of behavioral strategies to process text for learning purposes. Currently, no tools exist to detect a reader's use of strategies. The primary aim of this study was to develop Read, Understand, Learn, & Excel, an automated tool designed to detect reading strategy use and explore its accuracy in detecting strategies when students read digital, expository text.MethodAn iterative design was used to develop the computer algorithm for detecting 9 reading strategies. Twelve undergraduate students read 2 expository texts that were equated for length and complexity. A human observer documented the strategies employed by each reader, whereas the computer used digital sequences to detect the same strategies. Data were then coded and analyzed to determine agreement between the 2 sources of strategy detection (i.e., the computer and the observer).ResultsAgreement between the computer- and human-coded strategies was 75% or higher for 6 out of the 9 strategies. Only 3 out of the 9 strategies–previewing content, evaluating amount of remaining text, and periodic review and/or iterative summarizing–had less than 60% agreement.ConclusionRead, Understand, Learn, & Excel provides proof of concept that a reader's approach to engaging with academic text can be objectively and automatically captured. Clinical implications and suggestions to improve the sensitivity of the code are discussed.Supplemental Materialhttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8204786


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Kancler ◽  
Christopher C. Curtis ◽  
Darryl S. Stimson ◽  
Johnnie Jernigan

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor H. Appel ◽  
Carol Murray Quintana ◽  
Richard W. Cole ◽  
Mark D. Shermis ◽  
Paul D. Grubb ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Megan M. Campbell ◽  
Rebeca Robles ◽  
Denise L. Vieira ◽  
Brigitte Khoury ◽  
Saria Daouk ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Standish ◽  
E Leis ◽  
N Schmitz ◽  
J Credico ◽  
S Erickson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Suresh Chand Verma ◽  
Yoshiki Nakachi ◽  
Yoshihiko Wazawa ◽  
Yoko Kosaka ◽  
Takenori Kobayashi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Pepó

Plant regeneration via tissue culture is becoming increasingly more common in monocots such as maize (Zea mays L.). Pollen (gametophytic) selection for resistance to aflatoxin in maize can greatly facilitate recurrent selection and the screening of germplasm for resistance at much less cost and in a shorter time than field testing. In vivo and in vitro techniques have been integrated in maize breeding programmes to obtain desirable agronomic attributes, enhance the genes responsible for them and speed up the breeding process. The efficiency of anther and tissue cultures in maize and wheat has reached the stage where they can be used in breeding programmes to some extent and many new cultivars produced by genetic manipulation have now reached the market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document