scholarly journals Endoscopic ultrasonography guided transgastric trans-portal system fine needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic head and uncinate process malignancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. 719-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Wang ◽  
Shu Huang ◽  
Rong Pei ◽  
Jie Lin ◽  
Xiujiang Yang
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Uncinate Process ◽  
Portal System ◽  
Fine Needle

Endoscopic Ultrasonography

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Ryou ◽  
Nitkin Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Biliary Drainage ◽  
Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Celiac Plexus ◽  
Fine Needle

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a versatile tool that can be used to perform a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract. The proximity of the echoendoscope to the pancreas, liver, and other thoracic and abdominal organs allows detailed examination or minimally invasive intervention that would not be feasible by surgical or percutaneous approaches. EUS is available with radial or linear scanning arrays and is capable of guiding fine-needle aspiration to acquire tissue for cytologic analysis. This review covers the role of EUS in chronic pancreatitis; pancreatic cysts; submucosal tumors; suspected choledocholithiasis; fecal incontinence; staging of malignancy in esophageal, pancreatic, gastric, and rectal cancer; celiac plexus block/neurolysis; fiducial placement; pseudocyst drainage and cystogastrostomy/cystoduodenostomy; endoscopic necrosectomy; and biliary drainage. Figures show peripancreatic cysts, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, common bile duct stone, esophageal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic head mass causing biliary obstruction and invading portal confluence, fine-needle aspiration of a pancreatic head mass, rectal adenocarcinoma, abdominal aorta with celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery, celiac plexus neurolysis, necrosectomy, and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Tables list the Rosemont criteria for chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cystic lesions.   Key words: bile duct stone, biliary drainage, echoendoscope, endoscopic ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration, pancreatic cyst   This review contains 12 highly rendered figures, 2 tables, and 62 references.

Endoscopic Ultrasonography

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Ryou ◽  
Nitkin Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Biliary Drainage ◽  
Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Celiac Plexus ◽  
Fine Needle

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a versatile tool that can be used to perform a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract. The proximity of the echoendoscope to the pancreas, liver, and other thoracic and abdominal organs allows detailed examination or minimally invasive intervention that would not be feasible by surgical or percutaneous approaches. EUS is available with radial or linear scanning arrays and is capable of guiding fine-needle aspiration to acquire tissue for cytologic analysis. This review covers the role of EUS in chronic pancreatitis; pancreatic cysts; submucosal tumors; suspected choledocholithiasis; fecal incontinence; staging of malignancy in esophageal, pancreatic, gastric, and rectal cancer; celiac plexus block/neurolysis; fiducial placement; pseudocyst drainage and cystogastrostomy/cystoduodenostomy; endoscopic necrosectomy; and biliary drainage. Figures show peripancreatic cysts, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, common bile duct stone, esophageal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic head mass causing biliary obstruction and invading portal confluence, fine-needle aspiration of a pancreatic head mass, rectal adenocarcinoma, abdominal aorta with celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery, celiac plexus neurolysis, necrosectomy, and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Tables list the Rosemont criteria for chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cystic lesions.  This review contains 12 highly rendered figures, 2 tables, and 62 references. Key words: bile duct stone, biliary drainage, echoendoscope, endoscopic ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration, pancreatic cyst  

Endoscopic Ultrasonography

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Ryou ◽  
Nitkin Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Biliary Drainage ◽  
Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Celiac Plexus ◽  
Fine Needle

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is a versatile tool that can be used to perform a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract. The proximity of the echoendoscope to the pancreas, liver, and other thoracic and abdominal organs allows detailed examination or minimally invasive intervention that would not be feasible by surgical or percutaneous approaches. EUS is available with radial or linear scanning arrays and is capable of guiding fine-needle aspiration to acquire tissue for cytologic analysis. This review covers the role of EUS in chronic pancreatitis; pancreatic cysts; submucosal tumors; suspected choledocholithiasis; fecal incontinence; staging of malignancy in esophageal, pancreatic, gastric, and rectal cancer; celiac plexus block/neurolysis; fiducial placement; pseudocyst drainage and cystogastrostomy/cystoduodenostomy; endoscopic necrosectomy; and biliary drainage. Figures show peripancreatic cysts, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, common bile duct stone, esophageal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic head mass causing biliary obstruction and invading portal confluence, fine-needle aspiration of a pancreatic head mass, rectal adenocarcinoma, abdominal aorta with celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery, celiac plexus neurolysis, necrosectomy, and EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Tables list the Rosemont criteria for chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cystic lesions.   Key words: bile duct stone, biliary drainage, echoendoscope, endoscopic ultrasonography, fine-needle aspiration, pancreatic cyst   This review contains 12 highly rendered figures, 2 tables, and 62 references.

Pre-operative Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography in a Large Series

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Elisabetta Nardi ◽  
Nico Pagano ◽  
Claudio Ricci ◽  
Mariano Sica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Large Series ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Fine Needle

Background & Aims: Diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) is frequently challenging. We describe a large series of patients with p-NETs in whom both pre-operative Computed Tomography (CT) and Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) were performed. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected sporadic p-NET cases. All patients underwent both standard multidetector CT study and EUS with fine-needle aspiration (FNA). The final histological diagnosis was achieved on a post-surgical specimen. Chromogranin A (CgA) levels were measured. Results: A total of 80 patients (mean age: 58 ± 14.2 years; males: 42) were enrolled. The diameter of functioning was significantly lower than that of non-functioning p-NETs (11.2 ± 8.5 mm vs 19.8 ± 12.2 mm; P = 0.0004). The CgA levels were more frequently elevated in non-functioning than functioning pNET patients (71.4% vs 46.9%; P = 0.049). Overall, the CT study detected the lesion in 51 (63.7%) cases, being negative in 26 (68.4%) patients with a tumor ≤10 mm, and in a further 3 (15%) cases with a tumor diameter ≤20 mm. CT overlooked the pancreatic lesion more frequently in patients with functioning than non-functioning p-NETs (46.5% vs 24.3%; P = 0.002). EUS allowed a more precise pre-operative tumor measurement, with an overall incorrect dimension in only 9 (11.2%) patients. Of note, the EUS-guided FNA suspected the neuroendocrine nature of tumor in all cases. Conclusions: Data of this large case series would suggest that the EUS should be included in the diagnostic work-up in all patients with a suspected p-NET, even when the CT study was negative for a primary lesion in the pancreas.– . Abbrevations: CgA: chromogranin A; EUS: Endoscopic Ultrasonography; FNA: fine-needle aspiration; p-NETs: pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

scholarly journals Improvement of the Diagnosis of Isoattenuating Pancreatic Carcinomas by Defining their Characteristics on Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography and Endosonography with Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA)

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 776
Author(s):  
Robert Psar ◽  
Ondrej Urban ◽  
Marie Cerna ◽  
Tomas Rohan ◽  
Martin Hill
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Secondary Signs

(1) Background. The aim was to define typical features of isoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas on computed tomography (CT) and endosonography and determine the yield of fine-needle aspiration endosonography (EUS-FNA) in their diagnosis. (2) Methods. One hundred and seventy-three patients with pancreatic carcinomas underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT followed by EUS-FNA at the time of diagnosis. Secondary signs on CT, size and location on EUS, and the yield of EUS-FNA in isoattenuating and hypoattenuating pancreatic cancer, were evaluated. (3) Results. Isoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas occurred in 12.1% of patients. Secondary signs of isoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas on CT were present in 95.2% cases and included dilatation of the pancreatic duct and/or the common bile duct (85.7%), interruption of the pancreatic duct (76.2%), abnormal pancreatic contour (33.3%), and atrophy of the distal parenchyma (9.5%) Compared to hypoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas, isoattenuating carcinomas were more often localized in the pancreatic head (100% vs. 59.2%; p < 0.001). In ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis, the optimal cut-off value for the size of isoattenuating carcinomas on EUS was ≤ 25 mm (AUC = 0.898). The sensitivity of EUS-FNA in confirmation of isoattenuating and hypoattenuating pancreatic cancer were 90.5% and 92.8% (p = 0.886). (4) Conclusions. Isoattenuating pancreatic head carcinoma can be revealed by indirect signs on CT and confirmed with high sensitivity by EUS-FNA.

Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Kidney Masses

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (7) ◽  
pp. 1282-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Law ◽  
Sara Wobker ◽  
Ian S. Grimm ◽  
Todd H. Baron
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document