scholarly journals Improving classification of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve with neural monitoring: a research appraisal and narrative review

Gland Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 2847-2860
Author(s):  
Yishen Zhao ◽  
Zihan Zhao ◽  
Daqi Zhang ◽  
Yujia Han ◽  
Gianlorenzo Dionigi ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 161-177
Author(s):  
Viktor Y. Malyuga ◽  
Aleksandr A. Kuprin

Background. The external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve innervates a cricothyroid muscle, which provides tension in vocal cords and formation of high-frequency sounds. When the nerve is damaged during surgery, patients may notice hoarseness, inability to utter high pitched sounds, “rapid fatigue” of the voice, and dysphagia. According to literature, paresis of an external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve reaches up to 58% after thyroid surgery. Aim: to identify permanent landmarks and topographic variations of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve. Materials and methods. The study is based on the autopsy material (21 complexes organs of the neck) and on identification of variations of 40 external branches of the superior laryngeal nerve. We identified two permanent landmarks that are located at the minimum distance from nerve and we made metrical calculations relative to them: oblique line of thyroid cartilage and tendinous arch of the inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle. Results. The piercing point of the nerve is always located at the inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle without protruding beyond the oblique line of thyroid cartilage superiorly and tendinous arch of the inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle anteriorly. The nerve had the parallel direction in 92.8% of cases (angel less than 30 degrees) relative to the oblique line and in 85.7% cases it was in close proximity to this line (at distance up to 4 mm). The proposed topographic classification of the location of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve is based on localization of the piercing point of the nerve relative to the length of the oblique line of thyroid cartilage and the risk of nerve damage. In 14.2% of cases, the piercing point was in the front third of the line (type I), and in 50% it was in the middle third of this line (type II). These variations of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve was in close proximity to the upper pole of the thyroid gland, which could have lead to its damage during surgery. In type III and IV (35.8%) – the piercing point in the muscle was located as far as possible from the upper pole of the thyroid gland and the greater part of the nerve was covered with the fibers of inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle. Conclusion. We identified the main orienteers for the search and proposed anatomical classification of the location of the external branch on the superior laryngeal nerve.


2013 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S1-S14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Barczyński ◽  
Gregory W. Randolph ◽  
Claudio R. Cernea ◽  
Henning Dralle ◽  
Gianlorenzo Dionigi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paolo Del Rio ◽  
Elena Bonati ◽  
Tommaso Loderer ◽  
Matteo Rossini ◽  
Federico Cozzani

AbstractThe external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) provides motor function to the cricothyroid muscle (CTM). EBSLN damage produces changes in voice quality and projection. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in thyroid surgery aims to optimize EBSLN control during dissection. We prospectively collected the data of 88 consecutive patients who underwent total thyroidectomy with IONM from July 2019 to December 2019. IONM was offered in the intermittent mode of application. We routinely searched for the EBSLN electromyographic (EMG) signal before (S1) and after (S2) dissection of the superior vascular peduncle. In the absence of the EMG signal, we observed the CTM twitch. We identified 141 (80%) S1 EMG signals, while we recorded the CTM twitch in 15 cases (8.5%). In 20 (11.3%) cases, we were unable to identify the EMG signal. Analysing the S2 results, we found loss of EBSLN signal in 11/141 cases (7.8%) identified with IONM in pre-dissection stimulation. Among the 20 cases without pre-dissection identification (we had not identified the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve or the muscle twitch), in the post-dissection evaluation, we confirmed the loss of signal in 17 of 20 cases, equal to 85% (p < 0.001). Our data clearly show that intraoperative stimulation and recognition of EBSLN, performed before any dissection manoeuvre to the superior vascular thyroid pole, leads to a much higher rate of nerve conservation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-136
Author(s):  
Tulika Dubey ◽  
Brihaspati Sigdel ◽  
Rajendra Nepali ◽  
Neeraj KC

Background: Preservation of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) during thyroidectomy is important because its injury may lead to frequent occurrence of vocal fatigue and the inability to perform phonation. The objective of the study was to identify and classify the nerve as per Cernea's classification using operating microscope during thyroidectomy Method: Between January 2017 to December 2019, we evaluated 50 patients for the position of external branch of superior laryngeal nerve, who underwent microscopic thyroid surgeries in the department of ENT- head and neck surgery at Gandaki Medical College. Results: In our study, we dissected a total 59 superior poles of thyroid from 50 patients and identified the nerve in all the cases. Of the total superior poles, 36 (61.01%) had type IIa EBSLN among which 24 was on the right side and 12 on the left followed by 19 (32.20%) patients with type IIb EBSLN among which 8 on right and 11 on left side. There were only 4 poles (6.77%) of type I with 3 on the right and 1 on the left side. Conclusion: The EBSLN can be very efficaciously identified during a microscope assisted thyroidectomy. Cernea type 2a and 2b EBSLNs are in position to be at high risk of injury during ligation of the superior vascular pedicle, which can be avoided by prompt identification through a microscope and a meticulous extra capsular dissection technique.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 2521-2529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Wang ◽  
Huilan Cai ◽  
Deguang Kong ◽  
Qiuxia Cui ◽  
Dan Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document