Cognitive Style Dan Creative Quality  Mahasiswa Tadris Biologi IAIN Jember

Cognitive style adalah cara seseorang dalam mengolah suatu informasi. Sedangkan individu yang kreatif adalah individu yang dapat memecahkan keseluruhan permasalahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis cognitive style dan creative quality mahasiswa Tadris Biologi IAIN Jember Angkatan 2015. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) untuk mengukur Cognitive style dan Adjective Check List (ACL) untuk creative quality. Subjek penelitian ini yaitu sebanyak 33 mahasiswa dengan 31 perempuan dan 2 laki-laki. Hasil menunjukkan mahasiswa mengadopsi gaya berpikir intuitif dan memiliki tingkat kreativitas sebesar 1,24 yang menunjukkan kecenderung kearah individu yang kreatif.

Download Full-text

EXPRESS: Fooling System 1 in the field of perception: Failure to Intuitively Detect Attribute Substitution in the Flushtration Count Illusion

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology ◽

10.1177/17470218211069381 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 174702182110693

Author(s):

Cyril Thomas ◽

Marion Botella ◽

André Didierjean

Keyword(s):

Human Brain ◽

Cognitive Style ◽

Cognitive Reflection Test ◽

Substitution Error ◽

Perceptual Illusion ◽

Cognitive Reflection ◽

Ball Problem ◽

Perceptual Attribute ◽

System 1 ◽

The Relationship

To facilitate our interactions with the surroundings, the human brain sometimes reshapes the situations that it faces in order to simplify them. This phenomenon has been widely studied in the context of reasoning, especially through the attribute substitution error. It has however been given much less attention in the field of perception. Recent research on the bat-and-ball problem suggests that reasoners are able to intuitively detect attribute substitution errors. Using a perceptual illusion drawn from the field of magic, we investigate the extent to which a perceptual form of attribute substitution depends on executive resources and can be detected. We also investigate the relationship between susceptibility to attribute substitution error in the flushtration count illusion and in a French adaptation of the bat-and ball problem. Finally, we investigate the link between the intuitive cognitive style (assessed by the Cognitive Reflection Test) and the susceptibility to the flushtration count illusion. Our results suggest that participants do not detect perceptual attribute substitution error, that this phenomenon could be independent of the executive resources allocated to the task, and could rest on mechanisms distinct from those that produce errors in reasoning. We discuss differences between these two phenomena, and factors that may explain them.

Download Full-text

Cognitive reflection and the coronavirus conspiracy beliefs

10.31234/osf.io/p9wxj ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Hashem Sadeghiyeh ◽

Iman Khan Ahmadi ◽

Parvaneh Farhadbeigi ◽

Negar Karimi

Keyword(s):

Cognitive Style ◽

Wild Animals ◽

Cognitive Reflection Test ◽

Cognitive Reflection ◽

Reverse Pattern ◽

Conspiracy Beliefs

The COVID-19 pandemic reminded us of how quickly conspiracy ideas can spread and how dire their consequences could be. One important question is what traits would predict susceptibility to conspiracy beliefs. Previous research pointed to one of those traits: reflective versus intuitive cognitive style. Here we examined how cognitive style correlates with founded and unfounded beliefs about the origin of COVID-19. A sample of 173 Iranians rated the likelihood of different beliefs about the origin of the new coronavirus and answered the original Cognitive Reflection Test (Frederick, 2005). In line with previous research, the reflective responses were negatively correlated with conspiratory beliefs and positively correlated with the founded statement (that the virus was spread from wild animals by chance). The reverse pattern was found for the intuitive responses. The results accrue more evidence in support of a relationship between reflective-analytic style of thinking and the tendency to reject conspiracy beliefs.

Download Full-text

Cognitive Reflection Effects on Time Discounting

Journal of Individual Differences ◽

10.1027/1614-0001/a000254 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 39 (2) ◽

pp. 99-106 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michał Białek ◽

Przemysław Sawicki

Keyword(s):

Individual Differences ◽

Individual Difference ◽

Delay Discounting ◽

Reference Point ◽

Reference Points ◽

Cognitive Reflection Test ◽

Process Information ◽

Time Discounting ◽

Cognitive Reflection ◽

The Way

Abstract. In this work, we investigated individual differences in cognitive reflection effects on delay discounting – a preference for smaller sooner over larger later payoff. People are claimed to prefer more these alternatives they considered first – so-called reference point – over the alternatives they considered later. Cognitive reflection affects the way individuals process information, with less reflective individuals relying predominantly on the first information they consider, thus, being more susceptible to reference points as compared to more reflective individuals. In Experiment 1, we confirmed that individuals who scored high on the Cognitive Reflection Test discount less strongly than less reflective individuals, but we also show that such individuals are less susceptible to imposed reference points. Experiment 2 replicated these findings additionally providing evidence that cognitive reflection predicts discounting strength and (in)dependency to reference points over and above individual difference in numeracy.

Download Full-text