Long-Term Survival of the Acetabular Component After Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cement in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslam Chougle
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Taylor ◽  
Chris Frampton ◽  
Alastair G. Rothwell

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110043
Author(s):  
Antonios A Koutalos ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theofilos Karachalios

Purpose: The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies. Results: 46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. S38-S44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric M. Greber ◽  
Christopher E. Pelt ◽  
Jeremy M. Gililland ◽  
Mike B. Anderson ◽  
Jill A. Erickson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document