scholarly journals Does hydroxyapatite coating of uncemented cups improve long-term survival? An analysis of 28,605 primary total hip arthroplasty procedures from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA)

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1980-1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Lazarinis ◽  
K.T. Mäkelä ◽  
A. Eskelinen ◽  
L. Havelin ◽  
G. Hallan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hydroxyapatite Coating ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Arthroplasty Register ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Long-Term Survival of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Implants From Different Manufacturers

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Taylor ◽  
Chris Frampton ◽  
Alastair G. Rothwell
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Total Hip

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110043
Author(s):  
Antonios A Koutalos ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theofilos Karachalios
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Purpose: The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies. Results: 46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document