Copper Isotopic Perspectives on Supergene Processes: Implications for the Global Cu Cycle

Elements ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Mathur ◽  
Matthew S. Fantle
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Jirásek ◽  
Zdeněk Dolníček ◽  
Dalibor Matýsek ◽  
Tomáš Urubek

AbstractBarite is a relatively uncommon phase in vein and amygdule mineralizations hosted by igneous rocks of the teschenite association in the Silesian Unit (Western Carpathians). In macroscopically observable sizes, it has been reported from 10 sites situated only in the Czech part of the Silesian Unit. Microscopic barite produced by the hydrothermal alteration of rock matrix and also by the supergene processes is more abundant. We examined four samples of barite by mineralogical and geochemical methods. Electron microprobe analyses proved pure barites with up to 0.038 apfu Sr and without remarkable internal zonation. Fluid inclusion and sulphur isotope data suggests that multiple sources of fluid components have been involved during barite crystallization. Barite contains primary and secondary aqueous all-liquid (L) or less frequent two-phase (L+V) aqueous fluid inclusions with variable salinity (0.4-2.9 wt. % NaCl eq.) and homogenization temperatures between 77 and 152 °C. The higher-salinity fluid endmember was probably Cretaceous seawater and the lower-salinity one was probably diagenetic water derived from surrounding flysch sediments during compaction and thermal alteration of clay minerals. The δ34S values of barite samples range between -1.0 ‰ and +16.4 ‰ CDT suggesting participation of two sources of sulphate, one with a near-zero δ34S values probably derived from wall rocks and another with high δ34S values being most probably sulphate from the Cretaceous seawater. All results underline the role of externally derived fluids during post-magmatic alteration of bodies of rock of the teschenite association.



2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mir Ali Asghar Mokhtari ◽  
Hossein Kouhestani ◽  
Kazem Gholizadeh

Abstract The Qozlou Fe skarn deposit is located at the Abhar–Mahneshan belt of the Central Iranian Zone. It is associated with Upper Eocene porphyritic granite that intruded into the Upper Cretaceous impure carbonaceous rocks. The Qozlou granite has high-K calc-alkaline affinity and is classified as subduction-related metaluminous I-type granitoids. Skarn aureole in the Qozlou is composed of endoskarn and exoskarn zones, with the exoskarn zone being the main skarn and mineralized zone. It includes garnet skarn, garnet-pyroxene skarn, pyroxene skarn, epidote skarn, and pyroxene-bearing marble sub-zones. The Qozlou Fe deposit is 300 m long and 5–30 m wide. Magnetite is the main ore mineral associated to pyrite, chalcopyrite, and pyrrhotite. Garnet, clinopyroxene, actinolite, epidote, calcite, and quartz occur as gangue minerals. Covellite, hematite, and goethite were formed during the supergene processes. The ore and gangue minerals have massive, banded, disseminated, brecciated, vein–veinlets, replacement, and relict textures. EPMA data indicate that garnets have andradite–grossularite compositions (Ad39.97–100–Gr0–49.62) and clinopyroxenes have diopsidic composition (En29.43–42.5–Fs14.31–20.99–Wo43.08–50.17). Based on mineralogical and textural criteria, skarnification processes in the Qozlou skarn can be categorized into three discrete stages: (1) isochemical (metamorphic–bimetasomatic), (2) metasomatic prograde, and (3) metasomatic retrograde. Anhydrous calc-silicate minerals (garnet and clinopyroxene) were formed during the prograde metasomatic stage, while ore minerals and hydrous calc-silicate minerals were formed during the retrograde ore-forming sub-stage. Temperature and ƒO2 conditions range between 430 and 550 °C and 10−26 and 10−23, respectively, for the metasomatic prograde stage. The retrograde metasomatizing fluids had likely ƒS2 = 10−6.5 and temperatures < 430 °C at the beginning of the ore-forming sub-stage.





2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (7) ◽  
pp. 1577-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Kamenov ◽  
E. B. Melchiorre ◽  
F. N. Ricker ◽  
E. DeWitt


1983 ◽  
Vol 78 (7) ◽  
pp. 1379-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Sangameshwar ◽  
H. L. Barnes


2016 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 546-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.N. Páez ◽  
R. Ruiz ◽  
D.M. Guido ◽  
F.J. Ríos ◽  
I. Subias ◽  
...  


2007 ◽  
Vol 413 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-205
Author(s):  
O. B. Dudkin ◽  
S. S. Sandimirov


Author(s):  
Ryan Mathur ◽  
Spencer Titley ◽  
Fernando Barra ◽  
Susan Brantley ◽  
Marc Wilson ◽  
...  


1923 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-93
Author(s):  
Edson Sunderland Bastin
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document