Use of Dynamic Data for Estimating Average Reservoir Pressure, OGIP, and Optimum Well Spacing in Shale Gas Reservoirs

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Orozco ◽  
R. Aguilera
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (08) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 201694, “Interwell Fracturing Interference Evaluation of Multiwell Pads in Shale Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study in WY Basin,” by Youwei He, SPE, Jianchun Guo, SPE, and Yong Tang, Southwest Petroleum University, et al., prepared for the 2020 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, originally scheduled to be held in Denver, Colorado, 5–7 October. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The paper aims to determine the mechanisms of fracturing interference for multiwell pads in shale gas reservoirs and evaluate the effect of interwell fracturing interference on production. Field data of 56 shale gas wells in the WY Basin are applied to calculate the ratio of affected wells to newly fractured wells and understand its influence on gas production. The main controlling factors of fracturing interference are determined, and the interwell fracturing interacting types are presented. Production recovery potential for affected wells is analyzed, and suggestions for mitigating fracturing interference are proposed. Interwell Fracturing Interference Evaluation The WY shale play is in the southwest region of the Sichuan Basin, where shale gas reserves in the Wufeng-Longmaxi formation are estimated to be the highest in China. The reservoir has produced hydrocarbons since 2016. Infill well drilling and massive hydraulic fracturing operations have been applied in the basin. Each well pad usually is composed of six to eight multifractured horizontal wells (MFHWs). Well spacing within one pad, or the distance between adjacent well pads, is so small that fracture interference can occur easily between infill wells and parent wells. Fig. 1 shows the number of wells affected by in-fill well fracturing from 2016 to 2019 in the basin. As the number of newly drilled wells increased between 2017 and 2019, the number of wells affected by hydraulic fracturing has greatly increased. The number of wells experiencing fracturing interaction has reached 65 in the last 4 years at the time of writing.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Qiwei Li ◽  
Rui Yong ◽  
Jianfa Wu ◽  
Cheng Chang ◽  
Chuxi Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Optimum well spacing is an essential element for the economic development of shale gas reservoirs. We present an integrated assisted history matching (AHM) and embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) workflow for well spacing optimization by considering multiple uncertainty realizations and economic analysis. This workflow is applied in shale gas reservoirs of the Sichuan Basin in China. Firstly, we applied the AHM to calibrate ten matrix and fracture uncertain parameters using a real shale-gas well, including matrix permeability, matrix porosity, three relative permeability parameters, fracture height, fracture half-length, fracture width, fracture conductivity, and fracture water saturation. There are 71 history matching solutions obtained to quantify their posterior distributions. Integrating these uncertainty realizations with five well spacing scenarios, which are 517 ft, 620 ft, 775 ft, 1030 ft, and 1550 ft, we generated 355 cases to perform production simulations using the EDFM method coupled with a reservoir simulator. Then, P10, P50, and P90 values of gas estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) for different well spacing scenarios were determined. Additionally, the degradation of EUR with and without well interference was analyzed. Next, we calculated the NPVs of all simulation cases and trained the K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) proxy, which describes the relationship between the NPV and all uncertain matrix and fracture parameters and varying well spacing. After that, the KNN proxy was used to maximize the NPV under the current operation cost and natural gas price. Finally, the maximum NPV of 3 million USD with well spacing of 766 ft was determined.


Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3965
Author(s):  
Cheng Chang ◽  
Chuxi Liu ◽  
Yongming Li ◽  
Xiaoping Li ◽  
Wei Yu ◽  
...  

In order to account for big uncertainties such as well interferences, hydraulic and natural fractures’ properties and matrix properties in shale gas reservoirs, it is paramount to develop a robust and efficient approach for well spacing optimization. In this study, a novel well spacing optimization workflow is proposed and applied to a real shale gas reservoir with two-phase flow, incorporating the systematic analysis of uncertainty reservoir and fracture parameters. One hundred combinations of these uncertainties, considering their interactions, were gathered from assisted history matching solutions, which were calibrated by the actual field production history from the well in the Sichuan Basin. These combinations were used as direct input to the well spacing optimization workflow, and five “wells per section” spacing scenarios were considered, with spacing ranging from 157 m (517 ft) to 472 m (1550 ft). An embedded discrete fracture model was used to efficiently model both hydraulic fractures and complex natural fractures non-intrusively, along with a commercial compositional reservoir simulator. Economic analysis after production simulation was then carried out, by collecting cumulative gas and water production after 20 years. The net present value (NPV) distributions of the different well spacing scenarios were calculated and presented as box-plots with a NPV ranging from 15 to 35 million dollars. It was found that the well spacing that maximizes the project NPV for this study is 236 m (775 ft), with the project NPV ranging from 15 to 35 million dollars and a 50th percentile (P50) value of 25.9 million dollars. In addition, spacings of 189 m (620 ft) and 315 m (1033 ft) can also produce substantial project profits, but are relatively less satisfactory than the 236 m (775 ft) case when comparing the P25, P50 and P75 values. The results obtained from this study provide key insights into the field pilot design of well spacing in shale gas reservoirs with complex natural fractures.


Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Qiwei Li ◽  
Jianfa Wu ◽  
Cheng Chang ◽  
Hongzhi Yang ◽  
Chuxi Liu ◽  
...  

An appropriate well spacing plan is critical for the economic development of shale gas reservoirs. The biggest challenge for well spacing optimization is interpreting the subsurface uncertainties associated with hydraulic and natural fractures. Another challenge is the existence of complex natural fractures. This work applied an integrated well spacing optimization workflow in shale gas reservoirs of the Sichuan Basin in China with both hydraulic and natural fractures. The workflow consists of five components: data preparation, reservoir simulation, estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) analysis, economic calculation, and well spacing optimization. Firstly, the multiple realizations of thirteen uncertain parameters of matrix and fractures, including matrix permeability and porosity, three relative permeability parameters, hydraulic fracture height, half-length, width, conductivity, water saturation, and natural fracture number, length, and conductivity, were captured by the assisted history matching (AHM). The fractures were modeled by the embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) accurately and efficiently. Then, 84 AHM solutions combining with five well spacing scenarios from 517 ft to 1550 ft would generate 420 simulation cases. After reservoir simulation of these 420 cases, we forecasted the long-term gas production for each well spacing scenario. Gas EUR degradation and well interference would imply the critical well spacing. The net present value (NPV) for all scenarios would be calculated and trained by K -nearest neighbors (KNN) proxy to better understand the relationship between well spacing and NPV. In this study, the optimum well spacing was determined as 793 ft, corresponding with a maximum NPV of 18 million USD, with the contribution of hydraulic fractures and natural fractures.


Author(s):  
Jingyuan Chen ◽  
Yunsheng Wei ◽  
Junlei Wang ◽  
Wei Yu ◽  
Yadong Qi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Roger Yuan ◽  
Fa Dwan ◽  
Navpreet Singh ◽  
Liang Jin ◽  
Danny Soo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document