scholarly journals Arthroscopic Popliteus sling Reconstruction using the ‘Popliteus portal’ : An effective way to restore the Posterolateral corner stability A Case Series and Surgical Technique

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abey Thomas Babu ◽  
Santosh Sahanand ◽  
David Rajan
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Anatomic Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament

Abstract Background: Posterolateral corner injuries can result in persistent varus and rotary instability. Many open/ arthroscopic procedures of reconstruction/ repair have been reported, but there is a paucity of literature on clinical outcomes. We follow an all arthroscopic reconstruction technique of the popliteus sling with the use of the ‘popliteus portal’ in cases of isolated popliteus injuries (intact fibular collateral ligament). Methodds: Prospective case study of 12 patients undergoing Arthroscopic Popliteus sling reconstruction with or without associated cruciate ligament reconstruction was peformed. We report our surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Results: All our patients had good to excellent knee function at final follow up (IKDC and Tegner Scores). We did not encounter any major complications intra or post – operatively. Conclusions: In cases of Popliteus tendon injury without fibular collateral ligament injury, an ‘all – arthroscopic’ Popliteus sling reconstruction is an effective and reproducible technique of restoring posterolateral stability of the knee. The advantages of our procedure are – an ‘all – arthroscopic Technique’, avoiding damage to the meniscotibial ligaments and a more ‘anatomic’ reconstruction of the popliteus sling. Keywords: Knee, Posterolateral corner injury, popliteus, Arthroscopy, Reconstruction

Biomechanical Analysis of an Isolated Fibular (Lateral) Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Using an Autogenous Semitendinosus Graft

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 1521-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin R. Coobs ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade ◽  
Chad J. Griffith ◽  
Bradley J. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Anatomic Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament ◽  
Normal Stability ◽  
Semitendinosus Graft

Background The fibular collateral ligament is the primary stabilizer to varus instability of the knee. Untreated fibular collateral ligament injuries can lead to residual knee instability and can increase the risk of concurrent cruciate ligament reconstruction graft failures. Anatomic reconstructions of the fibular collateral ligament have not been biomechanically validated. Purpose To describe an anatomic fibular collateral ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus graft and to test the hypothesis that using this reconstruction technique to treat an isolated fibular collateral ligament injury will restore the knee to near normal stability. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Ten nonpaired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were biomechanically subjected to a 10 N·m varus moment and 5 N·m external and internal rotation torques at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. Testing was performed with an intact and sectioned fibular collateral ligament, and also after an anatomic reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament with an autogenous semitendinosus graft. Motion changes were assessed with a 6 degree of freedom electromagnetic motion analysis system. Results After sectioning, we found significant increases in varus rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, external rotation at 60° and 90°, and internal rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. After reconstruction, there were significant decreases in motion in varus rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°, external rotation at 60° and 90°, and internal rotation at 0°, 15°, and 30° of knee flexion. In addition, we observed a full recovery of knee stability in varus rotation at 0°, 60°, and 90°, external rotation at 60° and 90°, and internal rotation at 0° and 30° of knee flexion. Conclusion An anatomic fibular collateral ligament reconstruction restores varus, external, and internal rotation to near normal stability in a knee with an isolated fibular collateral ligament injury. Clinical Significance An anatomic reconstruction of the fibular collateral ligament with an autogenous semitendinosus graft is a viable option to treat nonrepairable acute or chronic fibular collateral ligament tears in patients with varus instability.

scholarly journals Comparative Biomechanical Study Between Minimally Invasive Popliteus and LCL Reconstruction Versus LaPrade Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0009
Author(s):  
Bancha Chernchujit ◽  
Arrisna Artha ◽  
Panin Anilabol
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Popliteofibular Ligament ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: Many aspects of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee have been extensively studied within the past 20 years. Quantitative anatomic and biomechanical studies have demonstrated the importance of the 3 static stabilizers of the lateral side of the knee: the fibular collateral ligament, the popliteus tendon, and the popliteofibular ligament. There are various methods of reconstruction. However, currently, there is no consensus on the preferred reconstruction technique for treating patients with chronic PLC injuries. We have developed a new reconstructive technique for PLC based on tibiofibular-based technique, similar to LaPrade, and this technique is less invasive than the previous techniques. Hypothesis: There is no difference between minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction and LaPrade’s method in restoring the posterolateral stability of knees Methods: Six paired fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were assessed in the intact state and then dissected to simulate a grade III posterolateral knee injury. By using a “Blocked randomization”, each paired knee was randomized into 2 groups (1) reconstruction via LaPrade’s method, (2) minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction. Biomechanical testing using varus stress radiographs was performed to compare knee stability between 2 groups. Results: This study included six paired knees, three males and three females. The mean age of the cadaver was 70.8 years (range 57-85 years). No difference was found in the demographic data (sex distribution, lateral opening gap of intact knee and side-to-side difference of lateral opening gap of sectioned knee) between the 2 groups. The side-to-side difference in lateral joint opening on the varus stress radiographs significantly improved after PLC reconstruction in both groups (p <0.001, p <0.001), However, there were no differences between the 2 groups in side-to-side difference of lateral opening gap after reconstruction (Mean difference=-0.05 (95%CI, -0.46 to 0.36); p- value=0.039). Conclusion: Biomechanically, minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction is equivalent to LaPrade’s technique in restoring the stability of knees in case of grade III PLC injury. Additionally, this technique is less invasive than all traditional open technique of PLC reconstruction. The minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction technique may be a treatment option for grade III PLC injury. Keywords: posterolateral corner; ligament reconstruction; popliteus tendon; lateral collateral ligament; popliteofibular ligament; knee biomechanics; minimally invasive surgery

scholarly journals Is Allograft Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow a Viable Option for Nonelite Athletes? Outcomes at a Mean of 8 Years

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712095914
Author(s):  
Justin C. Kennon ◽  
Erick M. Marigi ◽  
Chad E. Songy ◽  
Chris Bernard ◽  
Shawn W. O’Driscoll ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽  
Ulnar Neuropathy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
The Mean

Background: The rate of elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injury and surgery continues to rise steadily. While authors have failed to reach a consensus on the optimal graft or anchor configuration for MUCL reconstruction, the vast majority of the literature is focused on the young, elite athlete population utilizing autograft. These studies may not be as applicable for the “weekend warrior” type of patient or for young kids playing on high school leagues or recreationally without the intent or aspiration to participate at an elite level. Purpose: To investigate the clinical outcomes and complication rates of MUCL reconstruction utilizing only allograft sources in nonelite athletes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patient records were retrospectively analyzed for individuals who underwent allograft MUCL reconstruction at a single institution between 2000 and 2016. A total of 25 patients met inclusion criteria as laborers or nonelite (not collegiate or professional) athletes with a minimum of 2 years of postoperative follow-up. A review of the medical records for the included patients was performed to determine survivorship free of reoperation, complications, and clinical outcomes with use of the Summary Outcome Determination (SOD) and Timmerman-Andrews scores. Statistical analysis included a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare continuous variables between groups with an alpha level set at .05 for significance. Subgroup analysis included comparing outcome scores based on the allograft type used. Results: Twenty-five patients met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean time to follow-up was 91 months (range, 25-195 months), and the mean age at the time of surgery was 25 years (range, 12-65 years). There were no revision operations for recurrent instability. The mean SOD score was 9 (range, 5-10) at the most recent follow-up, and the Timmerman-Andrews scores averaged 97 (range, 80-100). Three patients underwent subsequent surgical procedures for ulnar neuropathy (n = 2) and contracture (n = 1), and 1 patient underwent surgical intervention for combined ulnar neuropathy and contracture. Conclusion: Allograft MUCL reconstruction in nonelite athletes demonstrates comparable functional scores with many previously reported autograft outcomes in elite athletes. These results may be informative for elbow surgeons who wish to avoid autograft morbidity in common laborers and nonelite athletes with MUCL incompetency.

scholarly journals Revision ACL Reconstruction in Adolescent Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596712095333
Author(s):  
Caitlin M. Rugg ◽  
Austin A. Pitcher ◽  
Christina Allen ◽  
Nirav K. Pandya
Keyword(s):  
Graft Failure ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Anatomic Reconstruction ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Adult Type ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
Graft Diameter

Background: High failure rates have been documented after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients, and revision surgery is indicated due to high activity levels of children and adolescents. Purpose: To define trends in revision ACLR in patients who underwent initial ACLR at younger than 18 years. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: An electronic medical record was used to retrospectively identify revision ACLR procedures performed by 2 surgeons between the years 2010 and 2016 in patients younger than 18 years at initial reconstruction. Descriptive information, intraoperative findings, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation data were recorded from initial and revision surgeries. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: A total of 32 patients (17 girls, 15 boys) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 15.8 years at initial reconstruction. For initial reconstructions, 15 patients underwent transphyseal procedures, 3 patients underwent adult-type procedures using an anatomic reconstruction technique that did not take into account the physis, and 2 patients underwent partial intraepiphyseal procedures. Graft types included hamstring autograft (n = 17), allograft (n = 5), hybrid (n = 4), and bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft (BTB; n = 3). Average primary reconstruction graft diameter was 8.0 mm (girls, 7.72 mm; boys, 8.36 mm; P = .045). After initial reconstruction, 10 patients had postoperative protocol noncompliance, and 8 patients reported delayed recovery. Mean time to retear was 565 days (range, 25-1539 days). At revision, BTB autograft was used in 50% (n = 16), followed by hamstring autograph (31.3%; n = 10) and allograft (12.5%; n = 4); mean graft diameter was 9.05 mm. Chondral surgery was more common during revision (25% for revision vs 0% for index; P = .031). There were 4 patients who required staged reconstruction with bone grafting. At mean final follow-up of 29.5 months (SD, 22.2 months), there were 3 graft failures (9.4%) and 5 contralateral ACL ruptures (15.6%). Conclusion: Most patients with ACL graft failure were adequately treated with a single revision. Conversion from a soft tissue graft to a BTB autograft was the most common procedure. Infrequently, patients required staged reconstructions. Providers should have a high index of suspicion for associated intra-articular injuries resulting from graft failure in adolescent patients.

Fibular Collateral Ligament/ Posterolateral Corner Injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell I. Kennedy ◽  
Andrew Bernhardson ◽  
Gilbert Moatshe ◽  
Patrick S. Buckley ◽  
Lars Engebretsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament ◽  
Posterolateral Corner Injury

Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Using the Anatomical Two-Tailed Graft Technique: Clinical Outcomes in the Multiligament Injured Knee

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1031-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarret Woodmass ◽  
Thomas Sanders ◽  
Nick Johnson ◽  
Isabella Wu ◽  
Aaron Krych ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Rotational Instability ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Full Extension ◽  
Injured Knee

AbstractInjury to the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee can lead to both varus and rotational instability. Multiple PLC reconstruction techniques have been described, including one-tailed graft (fibula-based constructs) or two-tailed graft (combined fibula- and tibia-based constructs). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of anatomical two-tailed graft reconstruction of the PLC in the setting of multiligament knee injuries (MKLIs) with grade III varus instability. Patients were identified through a prospective MLKI database between 2004 and 2013. Patients who received fibular collateral ligament and PLC reconstructions using a two-tailed graft and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Patients were assessed for clinical laxity grade, range of motion, and functional outcomes using Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. Twenty patients (16 male, 4 female) with a mean age of 30.7 (range: 16–52) and a mean follow-up of 52.2 months (range: 24–93 months) were included. Knee dislocation (KD) grades included: 4 KD-1, 10 KD 3-L, 5 KD-4, and 1 KD-5. No patients had isolated PLC injuries. Mean IKDC and Lysholm score were 73.1 ± 25.8 and 78 ± 26, respectively. Mean range of motion was –1.1 to 122.8. In full extension, two patients (10%) had grade 1 laxity to varus stress. In 30 degrees of knee flexion, five (25%) patients had grade 1 laxity, and two (10%) had grade 2 laxity. Anatomical two-tailed PLC reconstruction can reliably restore varus stability when performed on patients with MLKIs and type C posterolateral instability with hyperextension external rotation recurvatum deformity. Satisfactory functional outcome scores were achieved in the majority of patients. This study supports the use of an anatomical two-tailed PLC reconstruction in the multiligament injured knee. The level of evidence is IV, case series.

scholarly journals Outcome of the treatment of chronic isolated and combined posterolateral corner knee injuries with 2- to 6-year follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0007
Author(s):  
Gökay Görmeli ◽  
Cemile Ayşe Görmeli ◽  
Nurzat Elmalı ◽  
Mustafa Karakaplan ◽  
Kadir Ertem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Anatomical Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Varus Stress

Introduction: Injuries of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee are rare. They are difficult to diagnose and can cause severe disability. This study presents the 20- to 70-month clinical and radiological outcomes of the anatomical reconstruction technique of LaPrade et al. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients with chronic PLC injuries underwent anatomical PLC reconstruction. The anatomical locations of the popliteus tendon, fibular collateral ligament, and popliteofibular ligament were reconstructed using a 2-graft technique. The patients were evaluated subjectively with the Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee scores and objectively with the IKDC objective scores; additionally, varus stress radiographs were taken to evaluate knee stability. Results: Significant (p\0.05) improvements were observed in the postoperative Lysholm, IKDC-s, and Tegner scores compared with preoperatively. The IKDC objective subscores (lateral joint opening at 20_______________of knee extension, external rotation at 30_______________and 90_______________, and the reverse pivot-shift test) had improved significantly at the time of the final 40.9 ± 13.7-month follow-up.Lateralcompartment opening on the varus stress radiographs had decreased significantly in the postoperative period. However, there was still a significant difference compared with the uninjured knee. There was no significant improvement in the IKDC-s, Lysholm, or Tegner scores between the nine patients with isolated PLC injuries and twelve with multiligament injuries. Conclusions: Significant improvement in the objective knee stability scores and clinical outcomes with anatomical reconstruction showed that this technique can be used to treat patients with chronic PLC injured knees. However, longer-term multicentre studies and studies with larger groups comparing multiple techniques are required to determine the best treatment method for PLC injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document