scholarly journals Comparative Biomechanical Study Between Minimally Invasive Popliteus and LCL Reconstruction Versus LaPrade Technique

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0009
Author(s):  
Bancha Chernchujit ◽  
Arrisna Artha ◽  
Panin Anilabol
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Popliteofibular Ligament ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: Many aspects of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee have been extensively studied within the past 20 years. Quantitative anatomic and biomechanical studies have demonstrated the importance of the 3 static stabilizers of the lateral side of the knee: the fibular collateral ligament, the popliteus tendon, and the popliteofibular ligament. There are various methods of reconstruction. However, currently, there is no consensus on the preferred reconstruction technique for treating patients with chronic PLC injuries. We have developed a new reconstructive technique for PLC based on tibiofibular-based technique, similar to LaPrade, and this technique is less invasive than the previous techniques. Hypothesis: There is no difference between minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction and LaPrade’s method in restoring the posterolateral stability of knees Methods: Six paired fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were assessed in the intact state and then dissected to simulate a grade III posterolateral knee injury. By using a “Blocked randomization”, each paired knee was randomized into 2 groups (1) reconstruction via LaPrade’s method, (2) minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction. Biomechanical testing using varus stress radiographs was performed to compare knee stability between 2 groups. Results: This study included six paired knees, three males and three females. The mean age of the cadaver was 70.8 years (range 57-85 years). No difference was found in the demographic data (sex distribution, lateral opening gap of intact knee and side-to-side difference of lateral opening gap of sectioned knee) between the 2 groups. The side-to-side difference in lateral joint opening on the varus stress radiographs significantly improved after PLC reconstruction in both groups (p <0.001, p <0.001), However, there were no differences between the 2 groups in side-to-side difference of lateral opening gap after reconstruction (Mean difference=-0.05 (95%CI, -0.46 to 0.36); p- value=0.039). Conclusion: Biomechanically, minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction is equivalent to LaPrade’s technique in restoring the stability of knees in case of grade III PLC injury. Additionally, this technique is less invasive than all traditional open technique of PLC reconstruction. The minimally invasive popliteus and LCL reconstruction technique may be a treatment option for grade III PLC injury. Keywords: posterolateral corner; ligament reconstruction; popliteus tendon; lateral collateral ligament; popliteofibular ligament; knee biomechanics; minimally invasive surgery

scholarly journals Outcome of the treatment of chronic isolated and combined posterolateral corner knee injuries with 2- to 6-year follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2_suppl2) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0007
Author(s):  
Gökay Görmeli ◽  
Cemile Ayşe Görmeli ◽  
Nurzat Elmalı ◽  
Mustafa Karakaplan ◽  
Kadir Ertem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Anatomical Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Varus Stress

Introduction: Injuries of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee are rare. They are difficult to diagnose and can cause severe disability. This study presents the 20- to 70-month clinical and radiological outcomes of the anatomical reconstruction technique of LaPrade et al. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients with chronic PLC injuries underwent anatomical PLC reconstruction. The anatomical locations of the popliteus tendon, fibular collateral ligament, and popliteofibular ligament were reconstructed using a 2-graft technique. The patients were evaluated subjectively with the Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee scores and objectively with the IKDC objective scores; additionally, varus stress radiographs were taken to evaluate knee stability. Results: Significant (p\0.05) improvements were observed in the postoperative Lysholm, IKDC-s, and Tegner scores compared with preoperatively. The IKDC objective subscores (lateral joint opening at 20_______________of knee extension, external rotation at 30_______________and 90_______________, and the reverse pivot-shift test) had improved significantly at the time of the final 40.9 ± 13.7-month follow-up.Lateralcompartment opening on the varus stress radiographs had decreased significantly in the postoperative period. However, there was still a significant difference compared with the uninjured knee. There was no significant improvement in the IKDC-s, Lysholm, or Tegner scores between the nine patients with isolated PLC injuries and twelve with multiligament injuries. Conclusions: Significant improvement in the objective knee stability scores and clinical outcomes with anatomical reconstruction showed that this technique can be used to treat patients with chronic PLC injured knees. However, longer-term multicentre studies and studies with larger groups comparing multiple techniques are required to determine the best treatment method for PLC injuries.

scholarly journals Fibular Collateral Ligament: Varus Stress Radiographic Analysis Using 3 Different Clinical Techniques

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711877017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Kane ◽  
Mark E. Cinque ◽  
Gilbert Moatshe ◽  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Nicholas N. DePhillipo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Lateral Compartment ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: Fibular collateral ligament (FCL) tears are challenging to diagnose. Left untreated, FCL tears lead to residual ligament instability and increased joint loading on the medial compartment of the knee. Additionally, when a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is performed, increased forces on reconstruction grafts occur, which may lead to premature graft failure. Stress radiographs constitute a reliable and validated technique for the objective assessment of a complete grade III FCL tear. Purpose: To evaluate side-to-side difference (SSD) values of lateral compartment gapping on varus stress radiographs in patients with a grade III injury to the FCL. Additionally, to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of 3 different measurement techniques that used various radiographic reference points. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Inclusion criteria were patients who sustained an FCL with or without a concomitant ACL injury and underwent a combined FCL + ACL reconstruction between 2010 and 2016. Patients were excluded if they had a complete posterolateral corner injury, open physes, intra-articular fracture, meniscal root tear, other ligament injury, or prior surgery on either knee. All FCL tears were diagnosed with a clinical varus stress examination at 0° and 20° of knee flexion and varus stress radiographs at 20° of knee flexion measured in 3 different locations. The SSD for lateral compartment gapping was obtained from the varus stress radiographs and then statistically compared for interrater and intrarater reliability. Results: A total of 98 consecutive patients (50 males, 48 females; 13 isolated FCL injuries, 85 combined ACL + FCL injuries) with mean age 33.6 years (range, 18-69 years) were included. Measurement techniques 1, 2, and 3 had mean ± SD lateral compartment SSDs of 2.4 ± 0.20 mm, 2.2 ± 0.20 mm, and 2.0 ± 0.03 mm, respectively (no significant differences). Interrater reliabilities for the 3 measuring techniques were 0.83, 0.86, and 0.91, respectively, while intrarater reliabilities were 0.99, 0.77, and 0.99, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a lower SSD value of 2.2 mm to be consistent with a grade III FCL tear on clinician-applied varus stress radiographs in the clinical setting. Although all SSD measurement locations had excellent reliability, the method using the midpoint of the lateral tibial plateau was found to be the most reproducible.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Popliteus sling Reconstruction using the ‘Popliteus portal’ : An effective way to restore the Posterolateral corner stability A Case Series and Surgical Technique

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abey Thomas Babu ◽  
Santosh Sahanand ◽  
David Rajan
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Anatomic Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Fibular Collateral Ligament

Abstract Background: Posterolateral corner injuries can result in persistent varus and rotary instability. Many open/ arthroscopic procedures of reconstruction/ repair have been reported, but there is a paucity of literature on clinical outcomes. We follow an all arthroscopic reconstruction technique of the popliteus sling with the use of the ‘popliteus portal’ in cases of isolated popliteus injuries (intact fibular collateral ligament). Methodds: Prospective case study of 12 patients undergoing Arthroscopic Popliteus sling reconstruction with or without associated cruciate ligament reconstruction was peformed. We report our surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Results: All our patients had good to excellent knee function at final follow up (IKDC and Tegner Scores). We did not encounter any major complications intra or post – operatively. Conclusions: In cases of Popliteus tendon injury without fibular collateral ligament injury, an ‘all – arthroscopic’ Popliteus sling reconstruction is an effective and reproducible technique of restoring posterolateral stability of the knee. The advantages of our procedure are – an ‘all – arthroscopic Technique’, avoiding damage to the meniscotibial ligaments and a more ‘anatomic’ reconstruction of the popliteus sling. Keywords: Knee, Posterolateral corner injury, popliteus, Arthroscopy, Reconstruction

How Well Do Anatomical Reconstructions of the Posterolateral Corner Restore Varus Stability to the Posterior Cruciate Ligament—Reconstructed Knee?

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1117-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith L. Markolf ◽  
Benjamin R. Graves ◽  
Susan M. Sigward ◽  
Steven R. Jackson ◽  
David R. McAllister
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Tibial Rotation ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Popliteofibular Ligament ◽  
Grade 3

Background With grade 3 posterolateral injuries of the knee, reconstructions of the lateral collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, and popliteofibular ligament are commonly performed in conjunction with a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to restore knee stability. Hypothesis A lateral collateral ligament reconstruction, alone or with a popliteus tendon or popliteofibular ligament reconstruction, will produce normal varus rotation patterns and restore posterior cruciate ligament graft forces to normal levels in response to an applied varus moment. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Forces in the native posterior cruciate ligament were recorded for 15 intact knees during passive extension from 120° to 0° with an applied 5 N·m varus moment. The posterior cruciate ligament was removed and reconstructed with a single bundle inlay graft tensioned to restore intact knee laxity at 90°. Posterior cruciate ligament graft force, varus rotation, and tibial rotation were recorded before and after a grade 3 posterolateral corner injury. Testing was repeated with lateral collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament plus popliteus tendon, and lateral collateral ligament plus popliteofibular ligament graft reconstructions; all grafts were tensioned to 30 N at 30° with the tibia locked in neutral rotation. Results All 3 posterolateral graft combinations rotated the tibia into slight valgus as the knee was taken through a passive range of motion. During the varus test, popliteus tendon and popliteofibular ligament reconstructions internally rotated the tibia from 1.5° (0° flexion) to approximately 12° (45° flexion). With an applied varus moment, mean varus rotations with a lateral collateral ligament graft were significantly less than those with the intact lateral collateral ligament beyond 0° flexion; mean decreases ranged from 0.8° (at 5° flexion) to 5.6° (at 120° flexion). Addition of a popliteus tendon or popliteofibular ligament graft further reduced varus rotation (compared with a lateral collateral ligament graft) beyond 25° of flexion; both grafts had equal effects. A lateral collateral ligament reconstruction alone restored posterior cruciate ligament graft forces to normal levels between 0° and 100° of flexion; lateral collateral ligament plus popliteus tendon and lateral collateral ligament plus popliteofibular ligament reconstructions reduced posterior cruciate ligament graft forces to below-normal levels—beyond 95° and 85° of flexion, respectively. Conclusions With a grade 3 posterolateral corner injury, popliteus tendon or popliteofibular ligament reconstructions are commonly performed to limit external tibial rotation; we found that they also limited varus rotation. With the graft tensioning protocols used in this study, all posterolateral graft combinations tested overconstrained varus rotation. Further studies with posterolateral reconstructions are required to better restore normal kinematics and provide more optimum load sharing between the PCL graft and posterolateral grafts. Clinical Relevance A lower level of posterolateral graft tension, perhaps applied at a different flexion angle, may be indicated to better restore normal varus stability. The clinical implications of overconstraining varus rotation are unknown.

scholarly journals Biomechanics and physical examination of the posteromedial and posterolateral knee: state of the art

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 378-388
Author(s):  
Steven T Swinford ◽  
Robert LaPrade ◽  
Lars Engebretsen ◽  
Moises Cohen ◽  
Marc Safran
Keyword(s):  
Physical Examination ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Popliteofibular Ligament ◽  
Valgus Stress ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Posterior Translation ◽  
Dial Test

The posteromedial and posterolateral corner structures contribute significantly to knee stability. The posterior oblique ligament is a primary restraint to internal rotation and a secondary restraint to valgus. The superficial fibres of the medial collateral ligament are the primary valgus restraint and also provide secondary internal and external rotation stability. The deep fibres of the medial collateral provide additional restraint to internal and external rotation as well as valgus. The posteromedial capsule provides a secondary restraint to valgus and posterior translation. The lateral (fibular) collateral ligament is the primary varus stabiliser. The popliteus tendon complex is a primary restraint to external rotation. The popliteofibular ligament is a secondary restraint to external rotation and varus. Many physical examination manoeuvres have been described to assess these structures. Manoeuvres assessing the posterolateral structures include the varus stress test, dial test, the posterolateral drawer, the external rotation recurvatum test, heel height test and the reverse pivot shift. Examination manoeuvres that assess the posteromedial structures include the valgus stress test, dial test, anterolateral drawer test and anteromedial drawer test. Proper application of physical examination manoeuvres in conjunction with other diagnostic modalities will allow providers to develop appropriate treatment plans.

scholarly journals Kinematics of the posterolateral corner of the knee: A human cadaveric cutting study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967117S0013
Author(s):  
Tobias Drenck ◽  
Christoph Domnick ◽  
Mirco Herbort ◽  
Michael Raschke ◽  
Karl-Heinz Frosch
Keyword(s):  
Knee Flexion ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Posterolateral Corner ◽  
Clinical Diagnostics ◽  
Popliteus Tendon ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Intact State ◽  
Posterior Tibial ◽  
Intact Knee

Aims and Objectives: The posterolateral corner of the knee consists of different structures, which contribute to instability when damaged after injury or within surgery. Knowing the kinematic influences may help to improve clinical diagnostics and surgical techniques. The purpose was to determine static stabilizing effects of the posterolateral corner by dissecting stepwise all fibers and ligaments (the arcuat complex, AC) connected with the popliteus tendon (PLT) and the influence on lateral stability in the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) intact-state. Materials ans Methods: Kinematics were examined in 13 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees using a robotic/UFS testing system with an optical tracking system. The knee kinematics were determined for 134 N anterior/posterior loads, 10 Nm valgus/varus loads and 5 Nm internal/external rotational loads in 0°, 20°, 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion. The posterolateral corner structures were consecutively dissected: The I.) intact knee joint, II.) with dissected posterior cruciate ligament, III.) meniscofibular/-tibial fibers, IV.) popliteofibular ligament, V.) popliteotibial fascicle (last structure of static AC), VI.) PLT and VII.) LCL. Results: The external rotation angle increased significantly by 2.6° to 7.9° (P<.05) in 0° to 90° of knee flexion and posterior tibial translation increased by 2.9 mm to 5.9 mm in 20° to 90° of knee flexion (P<.05) after cutting the AC/PLT structures (with intact LCL) in contrast to the PCL deficient knee. Differences between dissected static AC and dissected PLT were only found in 60° and 90° external rotation tests (by 2.1° and 3.1°; P<.05). In the other 28 kinematic tests, no significant differences between PLT and AC were found. Cutting the AC/PLT complex did not further decrease varus, valgus or anterior tibial stability in any flexion angle in comparison to the PCL dissected state. Conclusion: The arcuat complex is an important static stabilizer for external rotatory and posterior tibial loads of the knee, even in the lateral collateral ligament intact-state. After dissecting the major parts of the arcuat complex, the static stabilizing function of the popliteus tendon is lost. The arcuat complex has no varus-stabilizing function in the LCL-intact knee. The anatomy and function of these structures for external-rotational and posterior-translational stabilization should be considered for clinical diagnostics and when performing surgery in the posterolateral corner.

Partial Controlled Early Postoperative Weightbearing Versus Nonweightbearing After Reconstruction of the Fibular (Lateral) Collateral Ligament: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Equivalence Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 2355-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. LaPrade ◽  
Nicholas N. DePhillipo ◽  
Tyler R. Cram ◽  
Mark E. Cinque ◽  
Mitchell I. Kennedy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lateral Collateral Ligament ◽  
Collateral Ligament ◽  
Stress Radiographs ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Statistical Equivalence ◽  
Varus Stress ◽  
Subjective Outcomes

Background: While early weightbearing protocols have been advocated after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, early weightbearing after fibular (lateral) collateral ligament reconstruction has not been well defined. Purpose: (1) To determine if early partial controlled weightbearing after fibular collateral ligament (FCL) reconstruction resulted in an objective difference in laxity on varus stress radiographs at postoperative 6 months as compared with nonweightbearing, and (2) to determine if there was a difference in pain, edema, range of motion, and subjective patient-reported outcomes between these groups at 3 time points. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled from January 2014 to April 2017. Patients who underwent isolated FCL reconstruction or combined ACL and FCL reconstructions were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to either a control group (nonweightbearing for 6 weeks) or a treatment group (partial controlled weightbearing at 40% body weight with crutches for 6 weeks). Patient-related data, including knee pain, edema, and range of motion, were collected for all patients at postoperative day 1, 6 weeks, and 6 months. Subjective outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The primary objective endpoint was varus stability, evaluated by bilateral varus stress radiographs obtained preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, with 6-month follow-up obtained for 36 (92%). There was a significant improvement between the preoperative side-to-side difference (SSD) (2.4 ± 1.0) and postoperative SSD (0.2 ± 1.0) for lateral compartment laxity on varus stress radiographs among all patients ( P < .001). Clinical and statistical equivalence was found between groups in terms of SSD on varus stress radiographs ( P < .001). The SSD in knee edema was significantly lower in the partial early weightbearing group (beta = −0.6 cm, P = .001), but there were no significant group differences in knee pain, flexion, or extension. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in subjective outcome scores between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative conditions ( P < .001 for every score measured). Conclusion: Clinical and statistical equivalence was found at postoperative 6 months between the early partial weightbearing and nonweightbearing groups among patients undergoing either an isolated FCL reconstruction or a combined ACL and FCL reconstruction. There were no significant differences observed between the groups regarding knee stability, pain, swelling, range of motion, or subjective outcomes. Given these findings, the authors recommend early partial weightbearing after isolated FCL reconstruction or combined ACL and FCL reconstruction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document