The Validity of Central Venous to Arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference to Predict Adequate Fluid Management during Living Donor Liver Transplantation. A prospective observational study.
Abstract Background: to assess the validity of Central and Pulmonary CO2 gaps to predict and guide fluid management during liver transplantation. Methods: Intraoperative fluid management was guided by pulse pressure variations (PPV). PPV of ≥15% triggered fluid resuscitation with 250 ml albumin 5% boluses to restoret PPV to <15%. Simultaneous blood sampling from central venous and pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) were clolected to calculate central and pulmonary CO2 gap. Patients were considered Fluid Responsive (FRS) if fluid boluses restored PPV to <15% and Fluid non-Responsive (FnRS) if not. CO and lactate and their correlation to CO2 gaps were also recorded. Results: The discriminative ability of Central and Pulmonary CO2 gaps between the two statuses (FRS and FnRS) was poor. AUC of ROC were 0.698 and 0.570 respectively. The Central CO2 gap was significantly higher in FRS than FnRS (P=0.016), with no difference in Pulmonary CO2 gap between both statuses. conclusion: Central and the Pulmonary CO2 gaps cannot be used alone as valid tools to predict fluid responsiveness and guide fluid management during liver transplantation. CO2 gaps do not correlate well with the changes in PPV or CO Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03123172. Registered on 31-march-2017