scholarly journals Incidence and Predictors of Sever Adverse Drug Reactions Among Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy at Debre Markos Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Getiye Dejenu Kibret ◽  
Tadesse Awoke Ayele ◽  
Adino Tesfahun

Abstract Background: Due to its nature of chronicity and the trend of using more drugs for patients with HIV, antiretroviral toxicity becomes a major challenge of HIV management. Evidences revealed that magnitude of experiencing at least one form of drug toxicity in different setting have been reached up to 90% among patients on antiretroviral therapy. The main aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and predictors of severe adverse drug reactions among People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) at Debre Markos Referral Hospital. Methods: Retrospective follow up study with survival analysis was carried out among people living with Human Immunodeficiency virus. Mean survival time of the cohort was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. To model the relationship between explanatory variables and the time to adverse drug reaction, Cox-proportional hazard regression model was fitted. Results: Out of the total 485 participants 67 (13.81%; 95% C.I: 10.7%, 16.8%) had experienced sever adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The incidence rate of severe adverse drug reaction development was 3 per 100-person years. Patients residing out of the catchment area to the facility were 73% at higher risk to develop ADR at any time, compared to those living within the catchment area (AHR=1.73; 95% C.I: 1.04, 2.86). The risk of ADRs among patients with baseline WHO clinical stage of III and IV was 2.59 times higher at any time compared to those with WHO stages I and II (95% C.I: 1.54, 4.36). Conclusion: The incidence of adverse drug reactions was relatively lower than reported in different parts of Ethiopia and other African countries. However, the overall burden in the 10 years period was still high. Health professionals working in the ART clinic need to give special attention for patients coming from outside of catchment areas, commercial sex workers and drivers and patients on advanced WHO clinical stages to prevent ADR development among these groups.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Getiye Dejenu Kibret ◽  
Tadesse Awoke Ayele ◽  
Adino Tesfahun

Abstract Background Due to its nature of chronicity and the trend of using more drugs for patients with HIV, antiretroviral toxicity becomes a major challenge of HIV management. Evidences revealed that magnitude of experiencing at least one form of drug toxicity in different setting have been reached up to 90% among patients on antiretroviral therapy. Objective The main aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and predictors of severe adverse drug reactions among People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) at Debre Markos Referral Hospital. Methods Retrospective follow up study with survival analysis was carried out among people living with Human Immunodeficiency virus. Mean survival time of the cohort was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. To model the relationship between explanatory variables and the time to adverse drug reaction, Cox-proportional hazard regression model was fitted. Results Out of the total 485 participants 67 (13.81%; 95% C.I: 10.7%, 16.8%) had experienced sever adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The incidence rate of severe adverse drug reaction development was 3 per 100-person years. Patients residing out of the catchment area to the facility were 73% at higher risk to develop ADR at any time, compared to those living within the catchment area (AHR=1.73; 95% C.I: 1.04, 2.86). The risk of ADRs among patients with baseline WHO clinical stage of III and IV was 2.59 times higher at any time compared to those with WHO stages I and II (95% C.I: 1.54, 4.36). Conclusion The incidence of adverse drug reactions was relatively lower than reported in different parts of Ethiopia and other African countries. However, the overall burden in the 10 years period was still high. Health professionals working in the ART clinic need to give special attention for patients coming from outside of catchment areas, commercial sex workers and drivers and patients on advanced WHO clinical stages to prevent ADR development among these groups.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Getiye Dejenu Kibret ◽  
Tadesse Awoke Ayele ◽  
Adino Tesfahun

Abstract Background Due to its nature of chronicity and the trend of using more drugs for patients with HIV, antiretroviral toxicity becomes a major challenge of HIV management. Evidences revealed that magnitude of experiencing at least one form of drug toxicity in different setting have been reached up to 90% among patients on antiretroviral therapy. Objective The main aim of this study was to estimate the incidence and predictors of severe adverse drug reactions among People Living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) at Debre Markos Referral Hospital. Methods Retrospective follow up study with survival analysis was carried out among people living with Human Immunodeficiency virus. Mean survival time of the cohort was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. To model the relationship between explanatory variables and the time to adverse drug reaction, Cox-proportional hazard regression model was fitted. Results Out of the total 485 participants 67 (13.81%; 95% C.I: 10.7%, 16.8%) had experienced sever adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The incidence rate of severe adverse drug reaction development was 3 per 100-person years. Patients residing out of the catchment area to the facility were 73% at higher risk to develop ADR at any time, compared to those living within the catchment area (AHR=1.73; 95% C.I: 1.04, 2.86). The risk of ADRs among patients with baseline WHO clinical stage of III and IV was 2.59 times higher at any time compared to those with WHO stages I and II (95% C.I: 1.54, 4.36). Conclusion The incidence of adverse drug reactions was relatively lower than reported in different parts of Ethiopia and other African countries. However, the overall burden in the 10 years period was still high. Health professionals working in the ART clinic need to give special attention for patients coming from outside of catchment areas, commercial sex workers and drivers and patients on advanced WHO clinical stages to prevent ADR development among these groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 596-603
Author(s):  
Deependra Prasad Sarraf ◽  
Gajendra Prasad Rauniar ◽  
Roshan Chhetri ◽  
Shyam Prasad Kafle ◽  
Suchana Marahatta ◽  
...  

Background: Antiretroviral drugs are lifeline for patients living with HIV. Adverse drug reactions can compromise the compliance to antiretroviral therapy. The objectives of the study were to estimate the prevalence of adverse drug reactions and to assess its risk factors in patients living with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy.Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted among 496 patients living with HIV at B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences for a period of one year. Adverse drug reactions were evaluated based upon clinical history, clinical examination and investigations. Results: Majority of patients were of 31-45 year age group (58.1%) and on first-line antiretroviral therapy regimen (94.3%). Total of 240 adverse drug reactions were documented. Prevalence of adverse drug reaction was 34.7%. Skin rash, anemia and nausea and vomiting were the three most common adverse drug reactions. The adverse drug reactions were more common in patients having non-communicable diseases, chronic co-infections, taking more than 3 non-HIV drugs, second and third-line antiretroviral regimen and it was statistically significant (P-value < 0.05). Conclusions: Prevalence of adverse drug reaction was high in the patients living with HIV. Age, gender, co-infections, non-communicable diseases, taking more than three non-HIV drugs and second and third-line antiretroviral regimen were identified as possible risk factor for occurrence of adverse drug reactions and their prior identification is important to optimize the best suited antiretroviral regimen.Keywords: Adverse drug reactions; antiretroviral therapy; pharmacovigilance


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document