Is Cell Regeneration and Infiltration a Double Edged Sword for Porcine Aortic Valve Deterioration: A Large Cohort of Histopathological Analysis
Abstract Background Bioprostheses are the commonest prostheses used for valve replacement in the western world. The major flaw of bioprostheses is the occurrence of structural valve deterioration (SVD). The objective of this study was to assess in a large cohort of patients the pathologic features of porcine aortic valve (PAV) SVD based on histomorphological and immunopathological features.Methods and materials 109 cases of resected PAV were observed grossly and histopathologically. The type and amount of infiltrated cells were evaluated in the different type of bioprosthetic SVD by immunohistochemical staining . Results The most common cause of SVD was calcification, leaflet dehiscence and tear (23.9%,19.3% and 18.3%, respectively). Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that vimentin positive cells aggregated around the calcified area in calcified PAV. Macrophages infiltrated in the calcified, lacerated and dehiscence PAV. However, MMP-1 expression was mainly found in the lacerated PAV. The VIM(+)/SMA(-) and VIM(+)/CD31(-) cells were found in PAV. The endothelia rate of dehiscence leaflets were higher than that of calcified and lacerated leaflets. A large amount of CD31 positive cells aggregated in the spongy layer in the lacerated and dehiscence PAV. Conclusions Cell regeneration and infiltration is a double edged sword for the PAV deterioration. Valve interstitial cells (VIC) have essential role in PAV calcification. Macrophages infiltration maybe involve in the different type of SVD, but only MMP-1expression involves in leaflets laceration. VIM(+)/CD31(-) valve endothelial cells (VECs) protect the PAV against the formation of calcified and lacerated lesions. The existence of untransformed VECs maybe one of pathologic substrate of PAV tear and dehiscence, although they can prevent VICs activation and subsequent valve fibrosis and calcification.