scholarly journals Patterns of Distant Metastases in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer –– A Population-Based Study

Author(s):  
Yang Gao ◽  
Kang Gu ◽  
Chuanzhen Bian ◽  
Ping Yan ◽  
Yunian Zhao

Abstract Background Currently, the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients remained poor mainly due to resistance, recurrence, metastasis and severe side effects. The study provided systematic insights into the patterns of TNBC distant metastases (DM), as well as investigating the related elements for the prognosis prediction of TNBC patients on the basis of on large sample. Methods We screened eligible patients with triple-negative breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. Besides, we analyzed differences in baseline characteristics among patients with diverse modes of metastasis. Meanwhile, we calculated proportional mortality ratio (PMR) and the expression of proportional trends in different patients. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was employed to investigate the survival outcomes. Finally, the predictive and prognostic factors of DM were identified. Results In this study, we included 24,822 TNBC patients, including 1,026 DM patients and 23,796 non-DM patients. At the time of initial diagnosis, 4.1% of patients had DM, and 36.9% had multiple metastases. According to the study, the most common sites of metastasis in DM patients were bone (251 cases) and lung (244 cases), while the least common organ of metastasis was brain (37 cases). Age, tumor grade, T, N and marital status were deemed as risk elements of DM. T stage, insurance status, marital status, surgery treatment, chemotherapy, number of metastatic sites and metastatic sites also effect the diagnosis of DM significantly. Conclusion Our study showed that the most common site of metastasis in TNBC patients with DM was bone and the least common site was brain. Different modes of metastasis have different survival and prognostic characteristics. Thus, our research may have important implications for the clinical practice of TNBC patients in the future.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (20) ◽  
pp. 7548-7557
Author(s):  
Christine Brezden‐Masley ◽  
Kelly E. Fathers ◽  
Megan E. Coombes ◽  
Behin Pourmirza ◽  
Cloris Xue ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12073-e12073
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiang Guan ◽  
Huan Li ◽  
Yajuan Chen ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Lin Tang ◽  
...  

e12073 Background: For T1-2N0M0 breast cancer after surgery and axillary staging, the current NCCN guideline recommends radiation therapy (RT) after lumpectomy but not total mastectomy unless there is a positive or less than 1 mm negative margin. This recommendation is regardless of hormonal status. Triple-negative breast cancer is a generally considered more aggressive compared with hormone positive breast cancer. We sought to investigate whether there is a survival benefit of RT in T1-2N0M0 TNBC. Methods: A Population-based retrospective analysis was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients included in the analysis were divided into three groups according to surgery modality and RT: breast conservation therapy (BCT, i.e., lumpectomy + RT), mastectomy alone, and mastectomy + RT. The survival endpoints were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 22473 female with T1-2N0M0 TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were included, with 13395 (60%) T1 and 9078 (40%) T2 cases. Surgery, RT and chemotherapy was done in 21674 (96%), 9633 (43%) and 14651 (65%) patients, respectively. Patients who underwent RT were older ( > 50 years, 78% vs 72%, P< 0.001), had fewer T2 (35% vs 44%, P< 0.001) tumor, and had more chemotherapy utilization (72% vs 60%, P< 0.001). 8807 patients had BCT; 8329 had mastectomy alone and 635 had mastectomy + RT. The 5-year BCSS rate was 94.3% for BCT, 93.3% for mastectomy alone ( P= 0.009 vs BCT), and 83.7% for mastectomy + RT ( P< 0.001 vs BCT and P< 0.001 vs mastectomy alone), respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 88.6% for BCT, 83.0 % for mastectomy alone ( P< 0.001 vs BCT), and 79.6% for mastectomy + RT ( P< 0.001 vs BCT and P= 0.190 vs mastectomy alone), respectively. Conclusions: In patients with T1-2N0M0 TNBC, BCT was associated with superior BCSS and OS compared to mastectomy with or without RT. After mastectomy, there was no evidence of survival benefit of RT, with worse BCSS and similar OS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document