scholarly journals Effect of Elective Induction of Labor on Pregnancy Outcome in Low-Risk Pregnant Women At or Beyond Later Than Term

Author(s):  
Qinjian Zhang ◽  
Siwen Chen ◽  
Xia Xu ◽  
Huale Zhang ◽  
Jianying Yan

Abstract Background Singleton low-risk pregnant women without obstetric or medical complications,can expect to terminate pregnancy by selective induced labor until 41 weeks later.But recent researches showed it is reasonable to offer elective induction of labor to low-risk nulliparous women 39 weeks 0 days of gestation, and this recommend need further research be conducted to measure the impact of this practice.The fundamental question is whether this operation will increase the additional risk of mother and fetus. Objective To investigate the effect of induced labor on maternal and fetal pregnancy outcome.Methods The method of this study is a retrospective case-control study.In this study, a total of 4386 pregnant women with singleton low-risk who underwent regular prenatal examination and successful vaginal delivery at or more than 41 weeks 0 days of gestation in Fujian Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. Review the clinical data,according to the mode of labor initiation, they were divided into induced labor group (2007 cases) and spontaneous onset of labor group (2361 cases). Further stratified analysis was carried out according to age and parity. Two-sample independent t-test and χ 2 test were used to analyze the differences of clinical characteristics such as maternal age and parity between the two groups. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the effect of induced labor on pregnancy outcome.Results The total duration of labor in the induced labor group was significantly longer than that in the spontaneous onset of labor group[ (9.37±5.37)vs (8.82±5.13)h,P<0.001],associated with more postpartum blood loss[ (219.18±188.32)vs (199.95±124.69)mL,P=0.01], and the incidence of severe postpartum hemorrhage(sPPH) was significantly higher[0.8%(16/2007) vs 0.33% (8/2361),P =0.041];increase but no significant difference in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage(PPH) [3.8 %(77/2007) vs 2.8% (66/2361),P =0.054].However,operative vaginal birth was more common in the induced labor group[3.8 %(77/2007) vs 2.8% (66/2361),P =0.054].Compared with spontaneous onset of labor,NICU admissions were higher with induction[3.8 %(77/2007) vs 2.8% (66/2361),P =0.054];but not significantly increase the risk of the third degree amniotic fluid contamination,placental abruption,birth weight and its distribution, sex of newborn, incidence of neonatal brain injury, incidence of neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage, perinatal death, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal septicemia, neonatal pneumonia and Apgar ≤ 7 at birth (P>0.05). After adjusting for age, the operation of induced labor in nulliparous is more likely to occur PPH[2.74 %(55/2007) vs 1.65 %(39/2361);RR=1.557;95%CI:1.039~2.332,P<0.05].Conclusion Selective induction of labor increases the complications of mother and child.Low-risk pregnant women should try to avoid induction without medical indications.

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. S21-S22
Author(s):  
Rachel G. Sinkey ◽  
Christina T. Blanchard ◽  
Jeff M. Szychowski ◽  
Elizabeth Ausbeck ◽  
Akila Subramaniam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 94-113
Author(s):  
Louise Marie Roth

This chapter analyzes changes over time in early-term births. Labor induction rates have risen over time and many experts speculate that at least half of inductions are elective. Popular accounts suggest that pregnant women are driving this by requesting inductions. Healthcare providers are also part of the story because they can refuse women’s requests, but hospitals and OB/GYN practices benefit enormously from scheduling births even though they pose medical risks. Analyses of early-term births in low-risk pregnancies reveal that providers are more likely to take unnecessary risks in states with tort reforms that limit their liability risk. This effect was strongest during the period before 2009, when the strength of professional recommendations against early elective induction had eroded.


2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaia Po’ ◽  
Emily A. Oliver ◽  
Uma M. Reddy ◽  
Robert M. Silver ◽  
Vincenzo Berghella

Author(s):  
Perveena Fareed ◽  
Suzaira Bashir ◽  
Sameer Ahmed Lone

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the rates of caesarean section and neonatal outcome in patients with elective induction of labor compared to patients with spontaneous onset of labor.Methods: Authors studied 200 patients with 100 in elective induction group and 100 in spontaneous onset laboring group. Two groups were compared with respect to demographic profile, basic examination, ultrasound findings, P/A, P/V findings, duration of labor, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome.Results: Various parameters like age residence, per abdominal findings were comparable in two groups. Labor was not prolonged in study group compared to control group. Rate of caesarean section remained high in induction group (21%) in comparison to spontaneous laboring group (4%). Rate of instrumental deliveries did not differ significantly between the groups. 5 min Apgar score did not vary significantly; however, the NICU admission was higher in induction group compared to spontaneous laboring group. Duration of hospital stay was longer in study group.Conclusions: Elective induction of labor has higher rates of caesarean deliveries. NICU admission was also longer in induction group.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e0192757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaori Takahata ◽  
Shigeko Horiuchi ◽  
Yuriko Tadokoro ◽  
Takuya Shuo ◽  
Erika Sawano ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document