scholarly journals Transcatheter arterial embolization for delayed recurrent intrathoracic bleeding caused by anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-lin LI ◽  
Jie-wei HU ◽  
Hai-ning ZHOU
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Embolization ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Arterial Embolization ◽  
Transcatheter Embolization ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Initial Surgery ◽  
Mediastinal Infection ◽  
Mckeown Esophagectomy

Abstract Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Its development into delayed recurrent intrathoracic bleeding is very rare and may lead to fatal consequences.Case presentation: We report a case of 67-year-old female who developed intrapleural infection, mediastinal infection and delayed recurrent intrathoracic bleeding as a complication of AL following minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy. The triple antibiotics of imipenem and cilastatin sodium, vancomycin, and fluconazole were used for anti-infection treatment. Transcatheter embolization of subclavian artery branch vessel avoided re-bleeding. As a result, the patient recovered well and was discharged 58 days after initial surgery.Conclusion: Delayed recurrent intrathoracic bleeding owing to AL is a rare and life-threatening complication after MIE. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) can provide a minimally invasive and effective method to control delayed recurrent intrathoracic bleeding after esophagectomy.

scholarly journals European consensus on essential steps of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown Esophagectomy through Delphi methodology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yassin Eddahchouri ◽  
◽  
Frans van Workum ◽  
Frits J. H. van den Wildenberg ◽  
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Round Table ◽  
Round Table Discussion ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Delphi Methodology ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
European Consensus ◽  
Mckeown Esophagectomy

Abstract Background Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex and technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To master MIE, training in essential steps is crucial. Yet, no consensus on essential steps of MIE is available. The aim of this study was to achieve expert consensus on essential steps in Ivor Lewis and McKeown MIE through Delphi methodology. Methods Based on expert opinion and peer-reviewed literature, essential steps were defined for Ivor Lewis (IL) and McKeown (McK) MIE. In a round table discussion, experts finalized the lists of steps and an online Delphi questionnaire was sent to an international expert panel (7 European countries) of minimally invasive upper GI surgeons. Based on replies and comments, steps were adjusted and rephrased and sent in iterative fashion until consensus was achieved. Results Two Delphi rounds were conducted and response rates were 74% (23 out of 31 experts) for the first and 81% (27 out of 33 experts) for the second round. Consensus was achieved on 106 essential steps for both the IL and McK approach. Cronbach’s alpha in the first round was 0.78 (IL) and 0.78 (McK) and in the second round 0.92 (IL) and 0.88 (McK). Conclusions Consensus among European experts was achieved on essential surgical steps for both Ivor Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.

PS01.159: THE IMPROVED POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY OUTCOMES FROM MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Xiaobin Zhang ◽  
Zhigang Li
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Recurrent Nerve ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Open Esophagectomy

Abstract Background The minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been developed in the past three decades. In our institution, the MIE was first introduced in 2012, and the proportion of MIE was used for over 70% in 2016–2017. This study aimed to compare the postoperative recovery outcomes between MIE and open esophagectomy in different period. Methods A total of 725 patients were enrolled in this study including 248 patients who underwent open esophagectomy within 2012–2013 and 477 patients who underwent MIE within 2016–2017. All patients received McKeown esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. And the perioperative complications were recorded according to the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) complication definitions. Results There was no statistically difference between OPEN and MIE groups with regard to preoperative characters except for age (60.8 ± 7.2 vs. 62.7 ± 7.7, P < 0.001) and body mass index (22.4 ± 3.0 vs. 23.1 ± 3.0, P = 0.002). One (0.2%) patient in the MIE group died within 90 days from anastomotic leakage, compared to 6 (2.4%) patients in the OPEN group (P = 0.004). The length of hospital stay was shorter in the MIE group (11 range 6–131 days, vs. 15 range 9–164 days, P < 0.001). The MIE group was in favor of lower complications (32.3% vs. 46.4%, P < 0.001). Pneumonia was the most common complications in both groups (12.6% in MIE vs. 27.4% in OPEN, P < 0.001). 15 (3.1%) patients in the MIE group experienced atrial arrhythmias compared with 30 (12.1%) in the OPEN group (P < 0.001). Lower anastomotic leakage was noted in the MIE group (11.5% vs. 25.4%, P < 0.001), as well as the wound infection (0.2% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.001), than in the OPEN group. The recurrent nerve injury was higher in the MIE group (11.7% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.024) but with more lymph nodes dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (3.8 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 2.0, P < 0.001). Conclusion The MIE was associated with better postoperative recovery outcomes and lower mortality. MIE technique should be considered as the mainstay surgical treatment for esophageal cancer in the current and future period. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

RA04.07: A NOVEL TECHNIQUE FOR CERVICAL GASTROESOPHAGEAL ANASTOMOSIS DURING MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
Yuequan Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Gastric Tube ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Cervical Anastomosis ◽  
Anastomotic Technique ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Postoperative Leakage

Abstract Background Anastomotic leakage, fibrous stricture and gastroesophageal reflux are three major complications of gastroesophageal anastomosis, particularly in cervical anastomosis. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel cervical anastomosis technique (NA) by comparing it to the traditional side-to-side anastomosis (SS), and the end-to-side anastomosis using a circular stapler (CS) in terms of postoperative leakage, stricture and reflux. Methods A total of 390 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent a minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis (192 with NA, 34 with SS and 164 with CS) in our institute from January 2013 and May 2016. The new anastomotic technique was improved from a type of side-to-side anastomosis technique which was reported by Collard et al. The difference of our new technique is that the part of the anastomotic stump was pushed into the tubular stomach. It let the end part of esophagus was embedded in the gastric tube while the end portion of the stomach was also reversed into the gastric tube (figure 1, 2, 3). The major postoperative complications including postoperative leakage, stricture and reflux were compared using three armed controlled study. Results With regard to the incidence of anastomotic leakage and reflux, the patients who underwent Jiang's anastomosis had a significantly lower rate than those in the SS group and CS group (Leaks: 1.0% vs. 8.8% and 8.5%, P = 0.025, 0.001; Reflux: 5.7% vs. 23.5% and 18.3%, P = 0.003, 0.001). The incidence of dysphagia was 10.4% with an occurrence rate of 1.5% for anastomotic strictures in the NA group. It was significant lower than that in the CS group (41.5% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.05) but not significantly different from that in SS group (11.8% vs. 2.9%). Conclusion The novel anastomotic technique remarkably reduced the incidence of gastroesophageal-anastomotic leakage, stricture and reflux and was a safe and effective technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography in Preventing Anastomotic Leakage After McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rao-Jun Luo ◽  
Zi-Yi Zhu ◽  
Zheng-Fu He ◽  
Yong Xu ◽  
Yun-Zheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Indocyanine Green ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Fluorescence Angiography ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Vascular Perfusion ◽  
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Patient Demographics

BackgroundIndocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography (FA) was introduced to provide real-time intraoperative evaluation of the vascular perfusion of the gastric conduit during esophagectomy. However, its efficacy has not yet been proven. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of ICG-FA in the reduction of the rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) in McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).MethodsFrom June 2017 to December 2019, patients aged between 18 and 80 years with esophageal carcinoma were enrolled in the study and each patient underwent McKeown MIE. Patients were divided into two groups, those with or without ICG-FA. The patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups. The primary outcome was the rate of AL.ResultsA total of 192 patients were included: 86 in the ICG-FA group and 106 in the non-ICG-FA group. Overall, 12 patients (6.3%) had AL; the rate of AL was 10.4% in the non-ICG-FA group, which was significantly higher than the 1.2% in the ICG-FA group.ConclusionsICG-FA has the potential to reduce the rate of AL in McKeown MIE.

O102 FINDING FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SAFE IMPLEMENTATION OF IVOR LEWIS TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Linda Claassen ◽  
Frans van Workum ◽  
Maroeska M Rovers ◽  
Gerjon Hannink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Efficient Learning

Abstract Aim To define factors associated with more efficient learning after implementation of Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE). Background and Methods It is unknown which factors are associated with more efficient learning after implementation of Ivor Lewis TMIE. Prospectively collected data of 15 European expert centers are retrospectively analyzed. Consecutive patients undergoing Ivor Lewis TMIE are included. The primary outcome is anastomotic leakage and the secondary outcome is textbook outcome (TBO). The pre-defined level of acceptance for anastomotic leakage is set at 8% with a 5% margin. Trends in outcome parameters are plotted using weighted moving average to define when the pre-defined level of acceptance is reached. Outcome trends are compared between groups of hospitals for the following factors: hospital volume, surgeon experience, overall TMIE experience, expert clinic visit, Ivor Lewis TMIE course followed and Ivor Lewis TMIE proctor supervision during implementation. Results This study included 1718 patients. Hospitals with a volume >50 cases per year reached the pre-defined level of acceptance for anastomotic leakage at case 114, hospitals with a volume <50 cases did not reach the pre-defined level of acceptance. Hospitals with surgeon experience >10 years and <10 years reached the pre-defined level of acceptance at case 112 and 135, respectively. Hospitals with overall TMIE experience >50 cases and <50 cases reached the pre-defined level of acceptance at case 45 and 112, respectively. Visiting an expert clinic, followed a TMIE course, or implementation under a proctor’s supervision did not contribute to reaching the level of acceptance earlier. Conclusion Learning curves are shorter and the level of acceptance is reached earlier if Ivor Lewis TMIE is implemented in a high-volume hospital, if the procedure is implemented in a hospital with a surgeon with >10 years of experience, or if the surgeon has experience in other types of TMIE of >50 cases. These findings can inform surgeons and can contribute to formulate evidence-based training programs.

The Comparisons of Three Stapler Placement Methods for Intrathoracic Mechanistic Circular Stapling in Ivor Lewis Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Zi xiang Wu ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Sai Bo Pan ◽  
Lian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Esophageal Reconstruction ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Anastomotic Complications ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Objectives: To analyze the impact of the reversal penetrating technique (RPT) for intrathoracic gastroesophageal mechanical anastomosis on the development of anastomotic complications in Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (ILMIE) and further identify the risk factors for the development of anastomotic leakage and stricture.Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using clinical data of 316 patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) who underwent ILMIE from January 2012 to December 2019. The participants were divided into three groups of RPT, transoral Orvil technique (TOT), or purse-string technique (PST) according to the different stapler placenent methods for intrathoracic mechanistic circular stapling. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate the association of risk factors with anastomotic leakage and stricture.Results: There were 154 patients with RPT, 78 with TOT and 84 with PST intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling in ILMIE. There was no differences in intraoperative anastomosis related conditions inclouding conversion of open operations, ways of esophageal reconstruction, lymph nodes harvested between the three groups. Whereas, The mean total operative time, and gastroesophageal anastomosis time in the RPT group were significantly shorter than those in other groups (both p<0.05). The rates of anastomotic leakage and stricture showed no statistical differences between three groups, respectively (Leakage: p=0.941; Stricture: p=0.942). Multivariate analysis revealed that the PRT method of the anvil placement does not increase the probability of anastomotic leakage (PRT: reference; TOT: odds ratio(OR) 2.845, P=0.255; PST: OR 2.234, p=0.242) and stricture (PRT: reference; TOT: OR 1.976, P=0.556; PST: OR 1.872, p=0.284).Conclusions: The PRT method of the anvil placement for intrathoracic gastroesophageal circular stapling does not increase the risk of anastomotic complications in ILMIE, but had significantly shorter surgical time and anastomosis time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document