scholarly journals Comparison of End-to-Side Hand-Sewn and Side-to-Side Stapled Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Patients with Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Transhiatal Esophagectomy: An Iranian Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Ziaeddin Rasihashemi ◽  
Ali Ramouz ◽  
Samad Beheshtirouy ◽  
Hassan Amini
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Anastomosis Group ◽  
Transhiatal Esophagectomy ◽  
Stapled Anastomosis ◽  
Esophagogastric Anastomosis ◽  
Thoracic Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis

Abstract Background: Controversies in terms of efficacy and postoperative advantages surround stapled esophagogastric anastomosis compared with the hand-sewn technique as a treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn end-to-side esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for the aforementioned patients.Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved examining the medical records of 433 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from March 2010 to March 2016. All the patients were operated using end-to-side hand-sewn esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. 409 of the patients received a year’s worth of follow-up evaluations. All the cases were revisited in two weeks as well as in four, eight, and 12 months after surgery. The patients were assessed in terms of postoperative outcomes, including reflux symptoms, anastomotic leakage and stricture, and the need for anastomotic dilatation.Results: Hand-sewn anastomosis was carried out in 271 (62.5%) patients, whereas stapled anastomosis was performed in 162 (37.4%) patients. The mean operative times were 214.46±84.33 min and 250.55±43.31 min for the stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis groups, respectively (P = 0.028). The two groups showed no significant differences with respect to stays in intensive care units and hospitals. Postoperatively, 38 (14.67%) cases of anastomotic leakage were detected in the hand-sewn anastomosis group, with incidence being significantly higher than that in the stapled anastomosis group (8 cases or 5.33%; P = 0.002). Anastomotic stricture occurred less frequently in the patients who underwent stapled anastomosis (P = 0.004). Within the one-year follow-up period, the patients treated via hand-sewn anastomosis more frequently required anastomotic dilatation (P = 0.02).Conclusion: Side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis may reduce operation times and decrease the rates of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and anastomotic dilatation in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Comparison of End-to-Side Hand-Sewn and Side-to-Side Stapled Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Patients with Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Transhiatal Esophagectomy: An Iranian Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Ziaeddin Rasihashemi ◽  
Ali Ramouz ◽  
Samad Beheshtirouy ◽  
Hassan Amini
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Anastomosis Group ◽  
Transhiatal Esophagectomy ◽  
Stapled Anastomosis ◽  
Esophagogastric Anastomosis ◽  
Thoracic Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis

Abstract Background: Controversies in terms of efficacy and postoperative advantages surround stapled esophagogastric anastomosis compared with the hand-sewn technique as a treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn end-to-side esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for the aforementioned patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved examining the medical records of 433 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from March 2010 to March 2016. All the patients were operated using end-to-side hand-sewn esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. 409 of the patients received a year’s worth of follow-up evaluations. All the cases were revisited in two weeks as well as in four, eight, and 12 months after surgery. The patients were assessed in terms of postoperative outcomes, including reflux symptoms, anastomotic leakage and stricture, and the need for anastomotic dilatation. Results: Hand-sewn anastomosis was carried out in 271 (62.5%) patients, whereas stapled anastomosis was performed in 162 (37.4%) patients. The mean operative times were 214.46±84.33 min and 250.55±43.31 min for the stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis groups, respectively (P = 0.028). The two groups showed no significant differences with respect to stays in intensive care units and hospitals. Postoperatively, 38 (14.67%) cases of anastomotic leakage were detected in the hand-sewn anastomosis group, with incidence being significantly higher than that in the stapled anastomosis group (8 cases or 5.33%; P = 0.002). Anastomotic stricture occurred less frequently in the patients who underwent stapled anastomosis (P = 0.004). Within the one-year follow-up period, the patients treated via hand-sewn anastomosis more frequently required anastomotic dilatation (P = 0.02). Conclusion: Side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis may reduce operation times and decrease the rates of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and anastomotic dilatation in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Comparison of End-to-Side Hand-Sewn and Side-to-Side Stapled Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Patients with Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Transhiatal Esophagectomy: An Iranian Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Ziaeddin Rasihashemi ◽  
Ali Ramouz ◽  
Samad Beheshtirouy ◽  
Hassan Amini
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Anastomosis Group ◽  
Transhiatal Esophagectomy ◽  
Stapled Anastomosis ◽  
Esophagogastric Anastomosis ◽  
Thoracic Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis

Abstract Background: Controversies in terms of efficacy and postoperative advantages surround stapled esophagogastric anastomosis compared with the hand-sewn technique as a treatment for patients with esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn end-to-side esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for the aforementioned patients.Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved examining the medical records of 433 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from March 2010 to March 2016. All the patients were operated using end-to-side hand-sewn esophago-gastrostomy and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. 409 of the patients received a year’s worth of follow-up evaluations. All the cases were revisited in two weeks as well as in four, eight, and 12 months after surgery. The patients were assessed in terms of postoperative outcomes, including reflux symptoms, anastomotic leakage and stricture, and the need for anastomotic dilatation.Results: Hand-sewn anastomosis was carried out in 271 (62.5%) patients, whereas stapled anastomosis was performed in 162 (37.4%) patients. The mean operative times were 214.46±84.33 min and 250.55±43.31 min for the stapled and hand-sewn anastomosis groups, respectively (P = 0.028). The two groups showed no significant differences with respect to stays in intensive care units and hospitals. Postoperatively, 38 (14.67%) cases of anastomotic leakage were detected in the hand-sewn anastomosis group, with incidence being significantly higher than that in the stapled anastomosis group (8 cases or 5.33%; P = 0.002). Anastomotic stricture occurred less frequently in the patients who underwent stapled anastomosis (P = 0.004). Within the one-year follow-up period, the patients treated via hand-sewn anastomosis more frequently required anastomotic dilatation (P = 0.02).Conclusion: Side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis may reduce operation times and decrease the rates of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and anastomotic dilatation in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Comparison of Hand-sewn and Modified Mechanical Anastomosis in Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Transhiatal Esophagectomy: An Iranian Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Ziaeddin Rasihashemi ◽  
Ali Ramouz ◽  
Samad Beheshtirouy ◽  
Hassan Amini
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Anastomosis Group ◽  
Transhiatal Esophagectomy ◽  
Mechanical Anastomosis

Abstract Background: There are controversies over the efficacy of mechanical stapler when compared with the hand-sewn (HS) technique in patients who underwent esophagogastric anastomosis in terms of efficacy and post-operative advantages. The purpose of the present study is to compare the clinical outcomes of manual and a modified mechanical stapled (MMS) anastomosis (double stapled technique) during esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 409 patient’s medical records who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between March 2010 and March 2016. All patients were operated using HS technique or MMS technique. All cases were visited in two weeks, four, eight and twelve months after surgery and were evaluated in terms of postoperative complications including anastomotic leakage, regurgitation, anastomotic stricture, dysphagia and need for anastomotic dilatation.Results: 259 (63.3%) patients were operated using HS technique and 150 patients (36.7%) were operated by MMS technique. The mean operative time was 211.45± 82.25 min for the MMS anastomosis group, whereas for the manual group it was 251.42±52.81 min, respectively (P = 0.023). Postoperatively, 38 (14.67%) anastomotic leakage were detected in the HS group compared to 8 (5.33%) the MMS group (P= 0.002). The results showed lesser anastomotic stricture in patients who underwent MMS anastomosis (P= 0.004). However, during the one-year follow-up period, patients with HS anastomosis required more anastomotic dilatation (P= 0.021).Conclusions: Using a MMS anastomosis may reduce operation time and lead to lower rates of anastomotic leak, decrease anastomotic stricture and anastomotic dilatation.

PS01.199: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CIRCULAR STAPLING VERSUS TRIANGULATING STAPLING ESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Masahiro Katsuda ◽  
Keiji Hayata ◽  
Mikihito Nakamori ◽  
Masaki Nakamura ◽  
Toshiyasu Ojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Esophagogastric Anastomosis ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis

Abstract Background Several studies have reported that the triangulating stapling method decreases the incidence of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy, but no randomized, controlled trial has confirmed the efficacy of the triangulating stapling method for cervical esophagogastrostomy. We compared triangulating stapling and circular stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis regarding the decrease in anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Methods Between August 2010 and April 2014, 100 patients enrolled in this randomized, controlled trial at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital were allocated randomly to either the circular stapling group (n = 49) or the triangulating stapling group (n = 51). The primary end point was the incidence of anastomotic stricture within 12 months postoperatively. This randomized, controlled trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000004848). Results There were no differences between the circular stapling and triangulating stapling groups in terms of clinical data. The amount of time required for esophagogastric anastomosis was slightly greater for the triangulating stapling group (22 minutes) than for the circular stapling group (18 minutes) (P = .028). Anastomotic stricture occurred in 8 patients (17%) in the circular stapling group and 9 patients (19%) in the triangulating stapling group (P = .935). The rate of anastomotic leakage was 11% for the circular stapling group and 2% for the triangulating stapling group (P = .073). Conclusion This RCT compared 2 techniques of cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. This study is the first to compare these 2 methods in a randomized, controlled fashion.This study could not show that the triangulating stapling method was superior to the circular stapling method for cervical esophagogastrostomy to reduce anastomotic stricture. The triangulating stapling method, however, might have the potential to decrease the rate of anastomotic leakage; a large-scale RCT will be required to assess this question. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Wide Gastric Conduit Increases the Risk of Benign Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-627
Author(s):  
Dong-shan Zhu ◽  
Jian-wei Cao ◽  
Ming-fei Geng ◽  
Xiao-yu Huang ◽  
Chong-ming Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Cervical Anastomosis ◽  
Wide Group

Background To identify the association between the width of the gastric conduit and the benign anastomotic stricture (BAS) after esophagectomy with end-to-side cervical anastomosis for esophageal cancer. Methods Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy between July 2013 and July 2014 were included in this study. The gastric conduit was used for reconstruction in all patients and end-to-side cervical anastomosis were performed using a circular stapler. The patients were divided into a narrow group (3-5 cm) and a wide group (>5 cm) based on the gastric conduit width. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to analyze the possible factors (patients’ age, gender, preoperative comorbidities, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, gastric conduit width, anastomotic leakage) that could affect the incidence of BAS. Results Two-hundred and one patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period was 29 months (17-58 months). Seven cases (3.5%) showed anastomotic leakage in the postoperative period and 38 patients (18.9%) developed BAS; all within the first year of follow-up. In univariate analysis, the width of the gastric conduit was the only risk factor for the development of BAS (odds ratio [OR] = 3.36, P = .005). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the wide group was an independent significant risk factor for the development of BAS developing compared with the narrow group (OR = 2.84, P = .02). Conclusions A wide gastric conduit width (>5 cm) is an independent risk factor for the development of BAS after esophagectomy and stapled cervical end-to-side anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

PS01.155: ANALYSIS ON THE INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTOR OF READMISSION AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Seong Yong Park ◽  
Dae Joon Kim ◽  
Jee Won Suh ◽  
Go Eun Byun
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Anastomotic Stricture ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Vocal Cord Palsy ◽  
Jejunostomy Tube ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Secondary Hospital ◽  
Wound Problem

Abstract Background Esophageal complications consensus group (ECCG) recommended that readmissions to primary or secondary hospital within 30 days of discharge after esophagectomy can be an important quality outcome indicator for esophagectomy. This retrospective study was performed to investigate the frequencies and risk factors for readmission after esophagectomy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 291 patients who received the esophagectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy for curative aim from January 2006 to June 2017. Results The mean age was 63.02 ± 8.02 years and male patients were 264 (90.7%). Thirty-nine (13.4%) patients readmit within 30 days after discharge. The mean readmission day after discharge was 14.76 ± 8.84. The common causes of readmission were anastomotic stricture requiring the ballooning (12, 30.7%), wound problem (7, 17.9%), pneumonia (6, 15.4%), and poor oral intake (4, 10.2%). Other causes of readmission were delayed gastric emptying (3), jejunostomy tube problem (2), ileus (2), pain (1), pneumothorax (1) and pleural effusion (1). On multivariate analysis, anastomotic leakage (odd ratio = 2.872, P = 0.022) were related to readmission, whereas age, pathologic stage, vocal cord palsy and neoadjuvant therapy were not related to readmission. In 30 patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage, the frequency of readmission due to wound problem (13.3% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.003) and anastomotic stricture (13.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.034) were significantly higher. Conclusion The incidence of readmission within 30 days after discharge was 13.4% and postoperative anastomotic leakage was related to the readmission, and it might be related to the wound problem and anastomotic stricture. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document