scholarly journals Using the Medical Research Council Framework for the development of a communication partner training intervention for people with primary progressive aphasia (PPA): Better Conversations with PPA

Author(s):  
Anna Volkmer ◽  
Aimee Spector ◽  
Kate Swinburn ◽  
Jason D. Warren ◽  
Suzanne Beeke

Abstract Background: Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a language-led dementia resulting in a gradual dissolution of language. PPA has a significant psychosocial impact on both the person and their families. Speech and language therapy (SLT) is one of the only available management options, and communication partner training (CPT) interventions offer a practical approach to identify strategies to support conversation. The aim of this study was to define and refine a manual and an online training resource for speech and language therapists to deliver CPT to people with PPA and their communication partners (CPs) called Better Conversations with PPA (BCPPA). Methods: The BCPPA manual and training program were developed using the Medical Research Council framework for developing complex interventions. The six-stage development process included 1. Review of existing literature, 2. Consultation and co-production 3. Development of an initial draft 4. Review by a group of speech and language therapists, using consensus methods 5. Two focus groups to gather opinions of people with PPA and their families 6. Refinement.Results: The BCPPA manual and training program comprises seven modules, and four CPT intervention sessions. Eight important components of CPT were identified in the consensus work undertaken with speech and language therapists, including use of video feedback to focus on strengths as well as areas of conversation breakdown. Three themes arose from the focus groups with people with PPA and their families 1) Timing of intervention, 2) speech and language therapists’ understanding of types of dementia, and 3) Knowing what helps. Refinements to the manual included additional practice activities and useful strategies for the future. Conclusions: Using the MRC framework to develop an intervention that is underpinned by a theoretical rationale based on a review of the literature, increases the likelihood of behaviour change. Co-development of the manual and training materials ensures the intervention will meet the needs of people with PPA and their CPs. Gathering further data from speech and language therapists and people living with PPA and their families to refine the manual and the training materials enhances the feasibility of delivering this in preparation for a phase II NHS-based randomised controlled pilot-feasibility study, currently underway.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Volkmer ◽  
Aimee Spector ◽  
Kate Swinburn ◽  
Jason D. Warren ◽  
Suzanne Beeke

Abstract Background Primary progressive aphasia is a language-led dementia resulting in a gradual dissolution of language. Primary progressive aphasia has a significant psychosocial impact on both the person and their families. Speech and language therapy is one of the only available management options, and communication partner training interventions offer a practical approach to identify strategies to support conversation. The aim of this study was to define and refine a manual and an online training resource for speech and language therapists to deliver communication partner training to people with primary progressive aphasia and their communication partners called Better Conversations with primary progressive aphasia. Methods The Better Conversations with primary progressive aphasia manual and training program were developed using the Medical Research Council framework for developing complex interventions. The six-stage development process included 1. Exploratory review of existing literature including principles of applied Conversation Analysis, behaviour change theory and frameworks for chronic disease self-management, 2. Consultation and co-production over 12 meetings with the project steering group comprising representatives from key stakeholder groups, 3. Development of an initial draft, 4. Survey feedback followed by a consensus meeting using the Nominal Group Techniques with a group of speech and language therapists, 5. Two focus groups to gather opinions from people with PPA and their families were recorded, transcribed and Thematic Analysis used to examine the data, 6. Refinement. Results Co-production of the Better Conversations with primary progressive aphasia resulted in seven online training modules, and a manual describing four communication partner training intervention sessions with accompanying handouts. Eight important components of communication partner training were identified in the aggregation process of the Nominal Group Technique undertaken with 36 speech and language therapists, including use of video feedback to focus on strengths as well as areas of conversation breakdown. Analysis of the focus groups held with six people with primary progressive aphasia and seven family members identified three themes 1) Timing of intervention, 2) Speech and language therapists’ understanding of types of dementia, and 3) Knowing what helps. These data informed refinements to the manual including additional practice activities and useful strategies for the future. Conclusions Using the Medical Research Council framework to develop an intervention that is underpinned by a theoretical rationale of how communication partner training causes change allows for the key intervention components to be strengthened. Co-production of the manual and training materials ensures the intervention will meet the needs of people with primary progressive aphasia and their communication partners. Gathering further data from speech and language therapists and people living with primary progressive aphasia and their families to refine the manual and the training materials enhances the feasibility of delivering this in preparation for a phase II NHS-based randomised controlled pilot-feasibility study, currently underway.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily C Pickering ◽  
Bec Hanley ◽  
Philip Bell ◽  
Jacqui Gath ◽  
Patrick Hanlon ◽  
...  

Clinical Trials Units are encouraged to integrate Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) into all aspects of trial design, delivery, oversight and dissemination. This research explored the induction and training of PPI Contributors joining trial oversight committees. It was used to create an induction pack for new PPI Contributors at the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London’s (MRC CTU at UCL). We have made this resource available to all researchers and in this we report describe the methodology behind its production.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivete Alonso Bredda Saad ◽  
Mariana De Moraes ◽  
Vinicius Minatel ◽  
Bruna Alonso Saad

A avaliação da dispneia tem sido feita por meio de instrumentos como escala de Borg modificada, a escala de cores e a escala do Medical Research Council modificada (mMRC). O objetivo deste estudo foi correlacionar a frequência respiratória com a sensação de dispneia, através das escalas citadas, correlacioná-las entre si e verificar se o grau de alfabetização influenciou na resposta do paciente sobre a sensação de dispneia. Para avaliar o esforço físico utilizou-se o teste de caminhada de seis minutos. Este foi um estudo prospectivo, transversal e analítico-descritivo composto por 124 voluntários com diagnóstico de doença pulmonar. Para comparar as variáveis categóricas entre os grupos foram utilizados os testes Qui-Quadrado e exato de Fisher. Para comparar as variáveis contínuas foi utilizado o teste Kruskal-Wallis e para análise de correlação foi utilizado o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman. A idade média foi de 55,9 (± 13,08 anos), 14% eram analfabetos. Nos tempos de análise houve correlação positiva entre as escalas mMRC e Borg, r = 0,43, r = 0,61 e r = 0,55. Entre as escalas mMRC e Cores, observou-se correlação negativa. Concluiu-se que a frequência respiratória correlacionou-se com as três escalas. O grau de alfabetização não modificou a resposta do paciente em relação à sensação de dispneia.Palavras-chave: dispneia, fisioterapia, avaliação.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document