scholarly journals Piloting a Self-Reported Symptom Assessment Tool in Three Outpatient Oncology Palliative Care Clinics

Author(s):  
Mallikaben Bhanubhai Patel ◽  
Ashley Leak Bryant ◽  
Deborah K Mayer ◽  
Gary Winzelberg

Abstract Background: Palliative care outpatient clinics should assess patients’ symptoms and quality of life prior to visits to guide care and response to treatments. We describe the implementation of a quality improvement initiative to increase symptom and quality of life screening in the outpatient oncology palliative care (OOPC) clinics of one National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Method: Our quality improvement project structure was based on the RE-AIM framework. Guided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach, we focused on assessing effective implementation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r ) and one Quality of Life (QoL) question at each OOPC visit. At the end of each 3-week PDSA cycle, barriers and facilitators were recognized and addressed. The implementation’s effectiveness was determined by percentage of adherence using the following formula: [(number of ESAS-r +1 QoL forms completed per clinic/Number of OOPC completed patient appointments per clinic) x 100].Results: A total of 372 patient appointments were completed during the four PDSA cycles, with overall 59% adherence. The first PDSA cycle compliance was 69%, 58% in the second, 52% in the third, and 65% at the last PDSA cycle. The primary barrier was staff turnover.Conclusion: We were able to implement the ESAS-r + 1 QoL form in a complex clinical outpatient setting. We identified barriers for sustainability, including staff turnover. We addressed these barriers by providing robust instructions that outlined an overview of the clinic workflow and education for all staff members involved in the implementation process. Based on our experience, we suggest integrating this form into the electronic medical record to monitor patient outcomes in the outpatient oncology clinics.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mallikaben Bhanubhai Patel ◽  
Ashley Leak Bryant ◽  
Deborah K Mayer ◽  
Gary Winzelberg

Abstract Background: Palliative care outpatient clinics should assess patients’ symptoms and quality of life prior to visits to guide care and response to treatments. We describe the implementation of a quality improvement initiative to increase symptom and quality of life screening in the outpatient oncology palliative care (OOPC) clinics of one National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Method: Our quality improvement project structure was based on the RE-AIM framework. Guided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach, we focused on assessing effective implementation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r ) and one Quality of Life (QoL) question at each OOPC visit. At the end of each 3-week PDSA cycle, barriers and facilitators were recognized and addressed. The implementation’s effectiveness was determined by percentage of adherence using the following formula: [(number of ESAS-r +1 QoL forms completed per clinic/Number of OOPC completed patient appointments per clinic) x 100].Results: A total of 372 patient appointments were completed during the four PDSA cycles, with overall 59% adherence. The first PDSA cycle compliance was 69%, 58% in the second, 52% in the third, and 65% at the last PDSA cycle. The primary barrier was staff turnover.Conclusion: We were able to implement the ESAS-r + 1 QoL form in a complex clinical outpatient setting. We identified barriers for sustainability, including staff turnover. We addressed these barriers by providing robust instructions that outlined an overview of the clinic workflow and education for all staff members involved in the implementation process. Based on our experience, we suggest integrating this form into the electronic medical record to monitor patient outcomes in the outpatient oncology clinics.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Arif Kamal ◽  
Amy Pickar Abernethy ◽  
Janet Bull ◽  
Jonathan Nicolla ◽  
Joseph Kelly ◽  
...  

102 Background: Supportive care is under-addressed in oncology and an important area for quality improvement. Regular, directed feedback is an important component of effective quality management. What type of feedback yields the highest conformance to supportive care measures? Methods: Within the Carolinas Palliative Care Consortium, we conducted a series of three PDSA cycles, each one month-long, to evaluate various types of clinician-directed feedback on conformance to two supportive care measures. We collected data using a web-based, mobile health platform called QDACT-PC (Quality Data Collection Tool for Palliative Care). Every four weeks, feedback to clinicians on performance was changed in a stepwise fashion, from “no feedback” to “personal feedback” to “comparative feedback” (personal conformance compared to the rest of the Consortium). We monitored weekly changes to conformance to two quality measures: documentation of timely management of constipation and dyspnea. To meet the measures, symptoms with intensity of >3/10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale required documentation of intervention within 24 hours. Conformance rates were calculated and compared to a historical baseline. Results: 23 providers participated in this quality improvement project, which spanned 465 patient encounters across 104 unique patients. Baseline data generated from 3/2008-10/2011 demonstrated baseline conformance to the dyspnea and constipation measures at 6% (27/457) and 4% (14/398), respectively. After addition of an electronic, prospective quality monitoring system alone (QDACT-PC), conformance increased to 93% (42/45) and 92% (23/25), respectively. With personalized, weekly feedback, these rates increased to 94% for dyspnea and 100% for constipation. Feedback comparing personal performance to the average of the rest of the Consortium further increased this to 100% for both. Conclusions: Regular, weekly feedback on performance increases conformance to supportive care quality measures. Adding comparative feedback versus other peers solidifies this effect. Duration of the effect is being evaluated.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 642-643
Author(s):  
Karen Blackstone ◽  
Anissa Rahman ◽  
Margaret Gloria ◽  
Elizabeth Cobbs

Aquichan ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Leonel dos Santos Silva ◽  
Bruna Eloise Lenhani ◽  
Dabna Hellen Tomim ◽  
Paulo Ricardo Bittencourt Guimarães ◽  
Luciana Puchalski Kalinke

Objective: To assess the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer in palliative therapy and in palliative care. Materials and Methods: Quantitative, observational, cross-sectional, and analytic study conducted in a teaching hospital in Paraná, Brazil, from January to June 2018, with 126 patients: 107 in palliative therapy; 19 in exclusive palliative care. The questionnaires for data collection were: Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 15-Palliative, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care 14, and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. The Spearman non-parametric coefficient test was used for the analysis. Results: The overall quality of life in palliative therapy and in palliative care was, respectively, 71.54/59.65; when correlating the total score of quality of life of the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 15-Palliative with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care 14 (p = 0.001), and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (p = 0.001), significant difference of better quality of life was observed in the palliative therapy. Conclusion: Patients in palliative therapy have good overall quality of life, while the palliative care group reports regular quality of life. The symptoms were milder in the palliative therapy and more intense and with greater significance in palliative care; hence, knowing the compromise of quality of life will help professionals in planning interventions with transdisciplinary approach for patients and for their families.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8524-8524 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. El Osta ◽  
F. S. Braiteh ◽  
S. Reddy ◽  
H. El Osta ◽  
E. Bruera

8524 Background: There is limited information about the characteristics and outcomes of inpatient palliative care consults in cancer centers. Two mobile teams (MT) each with a physician, fellow, and a nurse, provide consultation to hospitalized patients (pts) with complex symptoms. Methods: We analyzed the pts characteristics and outcomes during a two-month period. The charts were reviewed for demographics, cancer data, reason for consultation, symptoms, interventions, and outcomes. Results: Sixty-one pts were analyzed. Pain was the main reason for a consult request in 46 pts (75%), delirium in 10 (16%), anxiety in 4 (7%) and constipation in 5 (8 %). Some pts had more than one reason. 56(92%) pts had metastatic disease, diagnosis for ≤1 year in 26 (42%) and ≤2 years in 44 (72%) (Median =17 months). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), 0–10, is summarized in the table. We uncovered new issues at consultation, such as 20 pts (38%) screened positive for alcoholism with CAGE questionnaire and the 34 pts (56%) had clinical delirium. Features of opioids toxicity such as constipation (N=43;70%), confusion (N=35;57%) (Mean MMSE = 23 ± 5), hallucinations (N=21;34%), myoclonus (N=16;26%) and miosis (N=18;29%) were frequently identified. The MT interventions included imaging studies (23%), enema (43%), laxatives (49%), neuroleptics (54%), metoclopramide (39%), corticosteroids (25%). Half (N=30;50%) of the pts had opioid rotation and/or had counseling (N=27;46%). One out of two pts (N=30;49%) required transfer to the palliative care unit. Conclusions: Most pts had previously undiagnosed opioid toxicity, delirium, and other symptoms. Opioid toxicity occurred secondary to rapid opioid escalation, possibly linked to chemical coping, and psychosocial distress. The outcome of these pts improved by opioid rotation, adding laxatives, metoclopramide, neuroleptics, and steroids. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Kate Schueller ◽  
Joseph D. Rotella

Interdisciplinary palliative care teams can improve quality of life by addressing the needs and experience of the whole person with chronic kidney disease, including physical, psychological, social, spiritual, cultural, end-of-life, ethical, and practical concerns. Nephrology teams can develop the essential skills to provide primary palliative care for uncomplicated problems, but consultation with a specialty palliative care team is warranted for more severe, complex, or refractory problems. Although specialty palliative care can be delivered in any care setting, it may be a scarce resource outside of a hospital or hospice. Nephrology teams should identify all the specialty palliative care resources available in their community and consider engaging palliative care experts not only in patient care but also in advisory, educational, and quality improvement activities.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003090
Author(s):  
Andre Cipta ◽  
Bethany Turner ◽  
Eric C Haupt ◽  
Henry Werch ◽  
Lynn Reinke ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to use a spiritual screening question to quantify the prevalence of spiritual distress (SD) in a large cohort of seriously ill patients at admission to home-based palliative care (HBPC) and to examine the associations between SD with symptom burden, quality of life and hospital-based utilisation up to 6 months after admission to HBPC.MethodsData for this cohort study (n=658) were drawn from a pragmatic comparative-effectiveness trial testing two models of HBPC. At admission to HBPC, SD was measured using a global question (0–10-point scale: none=0; mild=1–4; moderate-to-severe=5+); symptoms and quality of life were measured with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and PROMIS-10. Hospital utilisation was captured using electronic records and claims. Median regression and proportional hazard competing risk models assessed the association between SD with symptoms and quality of life, and hospital utilisation, respectively.ResultsNearly half of the patients/proxies reported some level of SD. Increasing SD was significantly associated with higher symptom burden (increase of 7–14 points on ESAS) and worse mental well-being (decrease of 2.7 to 4.6 points on PROMIS-10-mental) in adjusted models. Compared with patients/proxies who reported no SD, those with at least some level of SD were not at increased risk for hospital-based utilisation over a median follow-up period of 2 months.ConclusionWhile SD is cross-sectionally associated with worse symptoms and mental well-being, it did not predict downstream hospital-based utilisation. Our results highlight the importance of assessing for and managing SD in patients with serious illness.


Author(s):  
Marvin Omar Delgado Guay

Patients with advanced disease experience severe physical and psychological symptoms which are often underdiagnosed and often addressed only when severe and debilitating. Recent studies have shown that routine assessment of symptoms is significantly associated with improvement of quality of life and extending survival. The optimal delivery of quality palliative care involves improving quality of life by impeccable assessment of physical and psychosocial symptoms. Routine screening of symptoms using validated tools often results in thorough assessment of the significant symptoms and prompt and optimal management of symptom distress. This chapter reviews the key aspects involved in screening and assessment of symptoms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 227-227
Author(s):  
Gabriel Lopez ◽  
Carol A Eddy ◽  
Wenli Liu ◽  
Yisheng Li ◽  
Minxing Chen ◽  
...  

227 Background: Exercise has shown benefits for cancer prevention and contributes to improved treatment-related outcomes. We reviewed characteristics of cancer patients referred for physical therapist-led exercise counseling at a comprehensive cancer center and its effects on self-reported symptoms and quality of life. Methods: Patients presenting for outpatient exercise counseling from February 2016 to May 2017 completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS; 0-10 scale, 10 most severe) pre/post-encounter and PROMIS10 global health assessment pre-encounter. ESAS individual items and subscales of Physical Distress (PHS), Psychological Distress (PSS), and Global Distress (GDS) were analyzed. We used paired t-tests to compare: (1) ESAS symptoms before and after each encounter and (2) ESAS and PROMIS10 scores at baseline and first follow-up. Results: Of 350 participants, most were female (77.7%), white (66.3%), and had breast (43%) cancer; 31% had at least one follow-up visit with the physical therapist. Symptom scores at baseline (frequency; mean) included poor sleep (68.2%; 3.5), poor well-being (67.4%; 3.2), and fatigue (64.7%; 3.1). Examination of pre- to post-exercise counseling outcomes revealed statistically, and clinically significant improvement in GDS (-3.32, SD 6.52, p<0.001). On follow-up, statistically and clinically significant improvements were observed for ESAS measures of fatigue (-1.22, p=0.01), GDS (-4.81, p=0.01), and PHS (-3.1, p=0.03) and PROMIS10 global health, mental health, and physical health scores (all p’s<0.05). Conclusions: Patients presenting for exercise counseling had a low to moderate symptom burden and experienced significant improvement in global distress after one encounter. Longitudinal evaluation revealed improvement in global health and fatigue. Additional research is needed to learn more about patient selection and timing of exercise counseling interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document