scholarly journals Acupuncture therapy for stable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihan Chen ◽  
Yitong Wang ◽  
Bing Xue ◽  
Caijiao Liu ◽  
Sijing Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is a common cardiovascular disease, which brings health burden to society. Acupuncture therapy is effective in improving SAP as adjunctive therapy, nevertheless, there were controversies on the effect of acupuncture on disease-affected meridian (DAM), sham acupoints and nonaffected meridian (NAM). This study evaluated the effect of acupuncture on DAM as adjunctive therapy, and the difference in acupuncture on DAM, sham acupoints, and nonaffected meridian NAM. Methods Thirteen online databases were searched from inception to December 2, 2019. Risk of bias and quality of evidence for outcomes were respectively assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and the GRADE approach. RevMan 5.3 was adopted to conduct meta-analysis. Results Thirteen RCTs including 1026 participants were included in this study. Acupuncture therapy could be effective in the improvement of angina severity, ECG results, 6-MWT, SAQ results (physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, disease perception), anxiety, HRV (LF, LF/HF), ET, CRP, and reduction of nitroglycerin intake. Acupuncture on DAM could be more beneficial than acupuncture on sham acupoints in aspects of angina severity, 6-MWT, SAQ results (angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, disease perception). Compared to acupuncture in NAM, acupuncture on DAM could be more effective in SAQ results (angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction). Moreover, acupuncture on DAM did not increase the risk of dropout and adverse effect. Conclusions Acupuncture on DAM could effectively improving SAP, and it could be more effective compared with acupuncture on sham acupoints or NAM. However, these conclusions were limited by low-quality of most of included studies. Registration Open Science Framework registration (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/F9DTW).

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Kalvelage ◽  
Christian Stoppe ◽  
Nikolaus Marx ◽  
Gernot Marx ◽  
Carina Benstoem

2012 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 365-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Werdan ◽  
Henning Ebelt ◽  
Sebastian Nuding ◽  
Florian Höpfner ◽  
Guido Hack ◽  
...  

Cardiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Danchin ◽  
Mario Marzilli ◽  
Alexander Parkhomenko ◽  
Jorge P. Ribeiro

Nutrition ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantin Militaru ◽  
Ionut Donoiu ◽  
Alina Craciun ◽  
Iulia Daria Scorei ◽  
Anca Mihaela Bulearca ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 927-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menco G. Niemeyer ◽  
Huub A.J. Kleinjans ◽  
Rob De Ree ◽  
Aeilko H. Zwinderman ◽  
Ton J.M. Cleophas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoying Gao ◽  
Siu-wai Leung ◽  
Yongliang Jia

Abstract Background: The efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) for angina pectoris has never been well investigated for lacking quality assessment of evidence. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive and rigorous network meta-analysis and assess the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations and Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to compare the efficacy of all TCMIs in treating angina pectoris.Methods: Following the protocol (reference: CRD42018117720), randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared one TCMI with another TCMI or conventional treatments on anginal outcome measures (i.e. symptomatic improvement, electrocardiography improvement, symptomatic recovery, and electrocardiography recovery) were included. The risk of bias among included RCTs was assessed with the revised Cochrane’s risk of bias tool 2. Frequentist statistical analyses including subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression and publication bias analysis were performed. The certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach.Results: Totally, 475 RCTs including all 24 TCMIs were identified, while the quality of all but two included RCTs was poor. According to the network meta-analysis, Honghua (Safflower) injection were preferable both in improving symptoms and electrocardiography. However, significant inconsistency showed the intransitivity among indirect comparisons, results in network meta-analysis seemed thus not trustworthy. The quality of evidence was assessed as low or very low.Conclusions: The low-quality evidence reduced the confidence in the efficacious results. Current evidence hardly supports the beneficial effects of TCMIs in treating angina pectoris.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document