scholarly journals “There Are Still a Lot of Things that I Need”: A Qualitative Study Exploring Opportunities to Improve the Health Services of First Nations People with Arthritis seen at an On-reserve Outreach Rheumatology Clinic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adalberto Loyola-Sanchez ◽  
Ingris Pelaez-Ballestas ◽  
Lynden Crowshoe ◽  
Diane Lacaille ◽  
Rita Henderson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Arthritis is a highly prevalent disease and leading cause of disability in the Indigenous population. A novel model of care consisting of a rheumatology outreach clinic in an on-reserve primary healthcare center has provided service to an Indigenous community in Southern Alberta since 2010. Despite quality assessments suggesting this model of care improves accessibility and is effective in meeting treatment targets, substantial improvements in patient-reported outcomes have not been realized. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore the experiences of Indigenous persons with arthritis and healthcare providers involved in this model of care to inform the development of health service improvements that enhance patient outcomes.Methods This was a narrative-based qualitative study involving a purposeful sample of 32 individuals involved in the Indigenous rheumatology model of care. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted to elicit experiences with the existing model of care and to encourage reflections on opportunities to improve it. A two-stage analysis was conducted. The first stage aimed to produce a narrative synthesis of sensitizing concepts through a dialogical method comparing people with arthritis and health providers’ narratives. The second stage involved a collective effort to crystalize these sensitizing concepts in specific recommendations to improve the quality of the current model of care. Triangulation, through participant checking and discussion among researchers, was used to increase the validity of the final recommendations.Results Ten Indigenous people with arthritis lived experience, 14 health providers and 8 administrative staff were interviewed. One main overarching theme was identified, which reflected the need to provide services that improve people’s functioning. Further, the following specific recommendations were identified: 1) enhancing patient-provider communication, 2) improving the continuity of the healthcare service, 3) increasing community awareness about the presence and negative impact of arthritis, and 4) increasing peer connections and support among people living with arthritis.Conclusions Improving the quality of the current Indigenous rheumatology model of care requires implementing strategies that improve functioning, patient-provider communication, continuity of care, community awareness and peer support. A community facilitator in a role of a patient navigator could facilitate the implementation of these strategies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adalberto Loyola-Sanchez ◽  
Ingris Pelaez-Ballestas ◽  
Lynden Crowshoe ◽  
Diane Lacaille ◽  
Rita Henderson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Arthritis is a highly prevalent disease and leading cause of disability in the Indigenous population. A novel model of care consisting of a rheumatology outreach clinic in an on-reserve primary healthcare center has provided service to an Indigenous community in Southern Alberta since 2010. Despite quality assessments suggesting this model of care improves accessibility and is effective in meeting treatment targets, substantial improvements in patient-reported outcomes have not been realized. Therefore, the objective of this study was to explore the experiences of Indigenous persons with arthritis and healthcare providers involved in this model of care to inform the development of health service improvements that enhance patient outcomes. Methods This was a narrative-based qualitative study involving a purposeful sample of 32 individuals involved in the Indigenous rheumatology model of care. In-depth interviews were conducted to elicit experiences with the existing model of care and to encourage reflections on opportunities to improve it. A two-stage analysis was conducted. The first stage aimed to produce a narrative synthesis of concepts through a dialogical method comparing people with arthritis and health providers’ narratives. The second stage involved a collective effort to synthesize concepts and propose specific recommendations to improve the quality of the current model of care. Triangulation, through participant checking and discussion among researchers, was used to increase the validity of the final recommendations. Results Ten Indigenous people with arthritis lived experience, 14 health providers and 8 administrative staff were interviewed. One main overarching theme was identified, which reflected the need to provide services that improve people’s physical and mental functioning. Further, the following specific recommendations were identified: 1) enhancing patient-provider communication, 2) improving the continuity of the healthcare service, 3) increasing community awareness about the presence and negative impact of arthritis, and 4) increasing peer connections and support among people living with arthritis. Conclusions Improving the quality of the current Indigenous rheumatology model of care requires implementing strategies that improve functioning, patient-provider communication, continuity of care, community awareness and peer support. A community-based provider who supports people while navigating health services could facilitate the implementation of these strategies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. e1914017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Beidelschies ◽  
Marilyn Alejandro-Rodriguez ◽  
Xinge Ji ◽  
Brittany Lapin ◽  
Patrick Hanaway ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e964-e973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neetu Chawla ◽  
Danielle Blanch-Hartigan ◽  
Katherine S. Virgo ◽  
Donatus U. Ekwueme ◽  
Xuesong Han ◽  
...  

Purpose: Although patient-provider communication is an essential component of health care delivery, little is known about the quality of these discussions among patients with cancer. Methods: Data are from the 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Experiences with Cancer survey among 1,202 adult cancer survivors. We evaluated discussions with any provider after a cancer diagnosis about: (1) follow-up care; (2) late or long-term treatment effects; (3) lifestyle recommendations, such as diet, exercise, and quitting smoking; and (4) emotional or social needs. Using a response scale ranging from “did not discuss” to “discussed in detail,” a summary score was constructed to define communication quality as high, medium, or low. Patient factors associated with the quality of provider discussions were examined using multivariable polytomous logistic regression analyses. Results: At the time of the survey, approximately one half of the patients (46%) were either within 1 year (24.1%) or between 1 and 5 years (22.0%) of treatment. More than one third of cancer survivors reported that they did not receive detailed communication about follow-up care, and more than one half reported that they did not receive detailed communication regarding late or long-term effects, lifestyle recommendations, or emotional and social needs. Only 24% reported high-quality communication for all four elements, indicating that the vast majority experienced suboptimal communication. In multivariable analysis, survivors reporting a high communication quality with providers included those who were within 1 year of treatment, between the ages of 18 and 64 years, non-Hispanic black or other ethnicity, and married. Conclusion: Study findings demonstrate gaps in the communication quality experienced by cancer survivors in the United States and help identify survivors for targeted interventions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily A. Hurley ◽  
Steven A. Harvey ◽  
Peter J. Winch ◽  
Mariam Keita ◽  
Debra L. Roter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1052-1061
Author(s):  
Lee Squitieri ◽  
Elena Tsangaris ◽  
Anne F. Klassen ◽  
Emiel L. W. G. Haren ◽  
Lotte Poulsen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document