scholarly journals Addressing the quality of paediatric primary care: Health worker and caregiver perspectives from a process evaluation of PACK Child, a health systems intervention in South Africa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Leigh Curran ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
Eric Bateman ◽  
Ruth Cornick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract Background: The WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) has resulted in progress in addressing infant and child mortality. However, unmet needs of children continue to present a burden upon primary healthcare services. The capacity of services and quality of care offered require greater support to address these needs by extending and integrating curative and preventive care for the child with a long-term health condition and the child older than 5, not prioritised in IMCI. In response to these needs, the PACK Child intervention was developed and piloted in October 2017- February 2019 in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. We report health worker and caregiver perspectives of the existing paediatric primary care context as well as the extent to which PACK Child functions to address perceived problems within the current local healthcare system. Methods: This process evaluation involved 52 individual interviews with caregivers, 10 focus group discussions with health workers, 3 individual interviews with trainers, and 31 training observations. Interviews and focus groups explored participants’ experiences of paediatric primary care, perspectives of the PACK Child intervention, and tensions with implementation in each context. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse verbatim interview and discussion transcripts.Results: Perspectives of caregivers and health workers suggest an institutionalised focus of paediatric primary care to treating children’s symptoms as acute episodic conditions. Health workers’ reports imply that this focus is perpetuated by interactions between contextual features such as, IMCI policy, documentation-driven consultations, overcrowded clinics and verticalised care. Whilst these contextual conditions constrained health workers’ ability to translate skills developed within PACK Child training into practice, the intervention initiated expanded care of children 0-13 years and those with long-term health conditions, enhanced professional competence, improved teamwork and referrals, streamlined triaging, and facilitated probing for psychosocial risk.ConclusionPACK Child appears to be catalysing paediatric primary care to address the broader needs of children, including long-term health conditions and the identification of psychosocial problems. However, to maximise this requires primary care to re-orientate from risk minimisation on the day of attendance towards a view of the child beyond the day of presentation at clinics.

scholarly journals Addressing the quality of paediatric primary care: Health worker and caregiver perspectives from a process evaluation of PACK Child, a health systems intervention in South Africa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Leigh Curran ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
Eric Bateman ◽  
Ruth Cornick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract Background: The WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) has resulted in progress in addressing infant and child mortality. However, unmet needs of children continue to present a burden upon primary healthcare services. The capacity of services and quality of care offered require greater support to address these needs by extending and integrating curative and preventive care for the child with a long-term health condition and the child older than 5, not prioritised in IMCI. In response to these needs, the PACK Child intervention was developed and piloted in 2017-2019 in the Western Cape Province of South Africa,. We report health worker and caregiver perspectives of the existing paediatric primary care context as well as the extent to which PACK Child functions to address perceived problems within the current local healthcare system. Methods: This process evaluation involved 52 individual interviews with caregivers, 10 focus group discussions with health workers, 3 individual interviews with trainers, and 31 training observations. Interviews and focus groups explored participants’ experiences of paediatric primary care, perspectives of the PACK Child intervention, and tensions with implementation in each context. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse verbatim interview and discussion transcripts.Results: Perspectives of caregivers and health workers suggest an institutionalised focus of paediatric primary care to treating children’s symptoms as acute episodic conditions. Health workers’ reports imply that this focus is perpetuated by interactions between contextual features such as, IMCI policy, documentation-driven consultations, overcrowded clinics and verticalised care. Whilst these contextual conditions constrained health workers’ ability to translate skills developed within PACK Child training into practice, the intervention initiated expanded care of children 0-13 years and those with long-term health conditions, enhanced professional competence, improved teamwork and referrals, streamlined triaging, and facilitated probing for psychosocial risk.Conclusion: PACK Child appears to be catalysing paediatric primary care to address the broader needs of children, including long-term health conditions and the identification of psychosocial problems. However, to maximise this requires primary care to re-orientate from risk minimisation on the day of attendance towards a view of the child beyond the day of presentation at clinics.

scholarly journals Addressing the quality of paediatric primary care: health worker and caregiver perspectives from a process evaluation of PACK child, a health systems intervention in South Africa

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Curran ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
Eric Bateman ◽  
Ruth Cornick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract Background The WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) has resulted in progress in addressing infant and child mortality. However, unmet needs of children continue to present a burden upon primary healthcare services. The capacity of services and quality of care offered require greater support to address these needs by extending and integrating curative and preventive care for the child with a long-term health condition and the child older than 5, not prioritised in IMCI. In response to these needs, the PACK Child intervention was developed and piloted in October 2017–February 2019 in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. We report health worker and caregiver perspectives of the existing paediatric primary care context as well as the extent to which PACK Child functions to address perceived problems within the current local healthcare system. Methods This process evaluation involved 52 individual interviews with caregivers, 10 focus group discussions with health workers, 3 individual interviews with trainers, and 31 training observations. Interviews and focus groups explored participants’ experiences of paediatric primary care, perspectives of the PACK Child intervention, and tensions with implementation in each context. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse verbatim interview and discussion transcripts. Results Perspectives of caregivers and health workers suggest an institutionalised focus of paediatric primary care to treating children’s symptoms as acute episodic conditions. Health workers’ reports imply that this focus is perpetuated by interactions between contextual features such as, IMCI policy, documentation-driven consultations, overcrowded clinics and verticalised care. Whilst these contextual conditions constrained health workers’ ability to translate skills developed within PACK Child training into practice, the intervention initiated expanded care of children 0–13 years and those with long-term health conditions, enhanced professional competence, improved teamwork and referrals, streamlined triaging, and facilitated probing for psychosocial risk. Conclusion PACK Child appears to be catalysing paediatric primary care to address the broader needs of children, including long-term health conditions and the identification of psychosocial problems. However, to maximise this requires primary care to re-orientate from risk minimisation on the day of attendance towards a view of the child beyond the day of presentation at clinics.

scholarly journals Addressing the quality of paediatric primary care: Health worker and caregiver perspectives of PACK Child, a health systems intervention in South Africa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Leigh Curran ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
Eric Bateman ◽  
Ruth Cornick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Integrated Management ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract Background: The WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) has resulted in progress in addressing infant and child mortality. However, unmet needs of children continue to present a burden upon primary healthcare services. The capacity of services and quality of care offered require greater support to address these needs by extending and integrating curative and preventive care for the child with a long-term health condition and the child older than 5, not prioritised in IMCI. In response to these needs, the PACK Child intervention was developed, to expand the scope of integrated management and training programmes for paediatric primary care. We report health worker and caregiver perspectives of the existing paediatric primary care context as well as the extent to which PACK Child functions to address perceived problems within the current local healthcare system. Methods: This process evaluation involved 52 individual interviews with caregivers, 10 focus group discussions with health workers, 3 individual interviews with trainers, and 31 training observations. Interviews and focus groups explored participants’ experiences of paediatric primary care, perspectives of the PACK Child intervention, and tensions with implementation in each context. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse verbatim interview and discussion transcripts.Results: Perspectives of caregivers and health workers suggest an institutionalised focus of paediatric primary care to treating children’s symptoms as acute episodic conditions. Health workers’ reports imply that this focus is perpetuated by interactions between contextual features such as, IMCI policy, documentation-driven consultations, overcrowded clinics and verticalised care. Whilst these contextual conditions constrained health workers’ ability to translate skills developed within PACK Child training into practice, the intervention initiated expanded care of children 0-13 years and those with long-term health conditions, enhanced professional competence, improved teamwork and referrals, streamlined triaging, and facilitated probing for psychosocial risk.ConclusionPACK Child appears to be catalysing paediatric primary care to address the broader needs of children, including long-term health conditions and the identification of psychosocial problems. However, to maximise this requires primary care to re-orientate from risk minimisation on the day of attendance towards a view of the child beyond the day of presentation at clinics.

scholarly journals Strengthening the quality of paediatric primary care: A process evaluation of a complex health systems intervention in South Africa

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Leigh Curran ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Ruth Vania Cornick ◽  
Sandra Picken ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Integrated Management ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract BACKGROUND: Innovative strategies like WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) have resulted in progress in addressing infant and child mortality. However, the needs of children continue to present a burden upon primary healthcare services. The capacity of services and quality of care offered require greater support to address these needs and extend integrated curative and preventive care, specifically, for the well child, the child with a long-term health condition and the child older than 5 years, not included in IMCI. In response to these needs, the PACK Child intervention was developed, based on a similar successful approach in adults, that expands the scope and reach of integrated management and training programmes for paediatric primary care. We report findings from the process evaluation of the integration of PACK Child intervention within the existing primary health care system. METHODS: A mixed methods process evaluation was completed in ten primary health care facilities in the Western Cape province in South Africa, where clinicians were trained to integrate PACK Child into routine practice. Qualitative data included interviews with managers, clinicians, caregivers and policymakers; observations of training, consultations and clinic flow. Quantitative data included training logs and clinicians’ questionnaires. RESULTS: Impact of PACK Child on clinical practice: Longer consultations, improved clinical knowledge and practice, better teamwork, strengthening of appropriate referrals and inclusion of psychosocial risk screening. Implementation fidelity of PACK Child was hindered by over-reliance on documentation and embedded checklist approach to consultations limited to acute episodic illnesses. PACK Child increased caregiver participation during consultations. CONCLUSIONS: The PACK Child intervention has strengthened primary care for children despite institutionalised care provided by a limited number of clinicians focusing on acute illness with little participation of the caregiver. With refinement of the programme, there is potential for PACK Child to strengthen paediatric care in low-resource settings.

scholarly journals Addressing the quality and scope of paediatric primary care in South Africa: Evaluating contextual impacts of the introduction of the Practical Approach to Care Kit for children (PACK Child)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Robyn Curran ◽  
Ruth Cornick ◽  
Sandy Picken ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Health Systems Strengthening ◽  
Psychosocial Issues ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Contextual Features ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract Background: Despite significant reductions in mortality, preventable and treatable conditions remain leading causes of death and illness in children in South Africa. The PACK Child intervention, comprising clinical decision support tool (guide), training strategy and health systems strengthening components, was developed to expand on WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness programme, extending care of children under 5 years to those aged 0-13 years, those with chronic conditions needing regular follow-up, integration of curative and preventive measures and routine care of the well child. In 2017-2018, PACK Child was piloted in 10 primary healthcare facilities in the Western Cape Province. Here we report findings from an investigation into the contextual features of South African primary care that shaped how clinicians delivered the PACK Child intervention within clinical consultations.Methods: Process evaluation using linguistic ethnographic methodology which provides analytical tools for investigating human behaviour, and the shifting meaning of talk and text within context. Methods included semi-structured interviews, focus groups, ethnographic observation, audio-recorded consultations and documentary analysis. Analysis focused on how mapped contextual features structured clinician-caregiver interactions. Results: Primary healthcare facilities demonstrated an institutionalised orientation to minimising risk upheld by provincial documentation, providing curative episodic care to children presenting with acute symptoms, and preventive care including immunisations, feeding and growth monitoring, all in children 5 years or younger. Children with chronic illnesses such as asthma rarely receive routine care. These contextual features constrained the ability of clinicians to use the PACK Child guide to facilitate diagnosis of long-term conditions, elicit and manage psychosocial issues, and navigate use of the guide alongside provincial documentation. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence that PACK Child is catalysing a transition to an approach that strikes a balance between assessing and minimising risk on the day of acute presentation and a larger remit of care for children over time. However, optimising success of the intervention requires reviewing priorities for paediatric care which will facilitate enhanced skills, knowledge and deployment of clinical staff to better address acute illnesses and long-term health conditions of children of all ages, as well as complex psychosocial issues surrounding the child.

scholarly journals Development of a tool for assessing quality of comprehensive care provided by community health workers in a community-based care programme in South Africa

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e030677
Author(s):  
Frances Griffiths ◽  
Olukemi Babalola ◽  
Celia Brown ◽  
Julia de Kadt ◽  
Hlologelo Malatji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Health Worker ◽  
Community Health Workers ◽  
Community Health Worker ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Comprehensive Care ◽  
Household Visit

ObjectiveTo develop a tool for use by non-clinical fieldworkers for assessing the quality of care delivered by community health workers providing comprehensive care in households in low- and middle-income countries.DesignWe determined the content of the tool using multiple sources of information, including interactions with district managers, national training manuals and an exploratory study that included observations of 70 community health workers undertaking 518 household visits collected as part of a wider study. We also reviewed relevant literature, selecting relevant domains and quality markers. To refine the tool and manual we worked with the fieldworkers who had undertaken the observations. We constructed two scores summarising key aspects of care: (1) delivering messages and actions during household visit, and (2) communicating with the household; we also collected contextual data. The fieldworkers used the tool with community health workers in a different area to test feasibility.SettingSouth Africa, where community health workers have been brought into the public health system to address the shortage of healthcare workers and limited access to healthcare. It was embedded in an intervention study to improve quality of community health worker supervision.Primary and secondary outcomesOur primary outcome was the completion of a tool and user manual.ResultsThe tool consists of four sections, completed at different stages during community health worker household visits: before setting out, at entry to a household, during the household visit and after leaving the household. Following tool refinement, we found no problems on field-testing the tool.ConclusionsWe have developed a tool for assessing quality of care delivered by community health workers at home visits, often an unobserved part of their role. The tool was developed for evaluating an intervention but could also be used to support training and management of community health workers.

scholarly journals Evaluating the performance of South African primary care: a cross-sectional descriptive survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Graham Bresick ◽  
Klaus B. Von Pressentin ◽  
Robert Mash
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
South African ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Assessment ◽  
First Contact

Introduction: In 2018 governments reaffirmed their commitment to implementing primary health care (PHC) in the Astana Declaration. South Africa has introduced a number of health reforms to strengthen PHC and enable universal health coverage (UHC). UHC requires access to quality primary care and progress needs to be measured. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of South African primary care using the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT).Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey used data derived from a previous analytical observational study. Data from 413 patients, 136 health workers and 55 managers were analysed from 30 community health centres across four provinces of South Africa. Scores were obtained for 10 key domains and an overall primary care score. Scores were compared in terms of respondents, provinces and monthly headcount.Results: Patients rated first contact accessibility, ongoing care and community orientation as the poorest performing elements ( 50% scoring as ‘acceptable to good’); first contact utilisation, informational coordination and family-centredness as weaker elements ( 66% scoring as ‘acceptable to good’); and comprehensiveness, coordination, cultural competency and availability of the PHC team as stronger aspects of primary care (≥ 66% or more scoring as ‘acceptable or good’). Managers and providers were generally much more positive about the performance of PHC.Conclusion: Gaps exist between PHC users’ experience of care and what PHC staff believe they provide. Priorities to strengthen South African primary care include improving access, informational and relational continuity of care, and ensuring the implementation of community-orientated primary care. The PCAT is a useful tool to measure quality of primary care and progress with UHC.

scholarly journals Addressing the quality and scope of paediatric primary care in South Africa: Evaluating contextual impacts of the introduction of the Practical Approach to Care Kit for children (PACK Child)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Robyn Curran ◽  
Ruth Cornick ◽  
Sandy Picken ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Health Systems Strengthening ◽  
Psychosocial Issues ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Contextual Features ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract Background: Despite significant reductions in mortality, preventable and treatable conditions remain leading causes of death and illness in children in South Africa. The PACK Child intervention, comprising clinical decision support tool (guide), training strategy and health systems strengthening components, was developed to expand on WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness programme, extending care of children under 5 years to those aged 0-13 years, those with chronic conditions needing regular follow-up, integration of curative and preventive measures and routine care of the well child. In 2017-2018, PACK Child was piloted in 10 primary healthcare facilities in the Western Cape Province. Here we report findings from an investigation into the contextual features of South African primary care that shaped how clinicians delivered the PACK Child intervention within clinical consultations. Methods: Process evaluation using linguistic ethnographic methodology which provides analytical tools for investigating human behaviour, and the shifting meaning of talk and text within context. Methods included semi-structured interviews, focus groups, ethnographic observation, audio-recorded consultations and documentary analysis. Analysis focused on how mapped contextual features structured clinician-caregiver interactions. Results: Primary healthcare facilities demonstrated an institutionalised orientation to minimising risk upheld by provincial documentation, providing curative episodic care to children presenting with acute symptoms, and preventive care including immunisations, feeding and growth monitoring, all in children 5 years or younger. Children with chronic illnesses such as asthma rarely receive routine care. These contextual features constrained the ability of clinicians to use the PACK Child guide to facilitate diagnosis of long-term conditions, elicit and manage psychosocial issues, and navigate use of the guide alongside provincial documentation. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence that PACK Child is catalysing a transition to an approach that strikes a balance between assessing and minimising risk on the day of acute presentation and a larger remit of care for children over time. However, optimising success of the intervention requires reviewing priorities for paediatric care which will facilitate enhanced skills, knowledge and deployment of clinical staff to better address acute illnesses and long-term health conditions of children of all ages, as well as complex psychosocial issues surrounding the child.

scholarly journals Strengthening the quality and scope of paediatric primary care in South Africa: Evaluating contextual impacts of the introduction of the Practical Approach to Care Kit for children (PACK Child)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Robyn Curran ◽  
Ruth Cornick ◽  
Sandy Picken ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Health Systems Strengthening ◽  
Psychosocial Issues ◽  
Risk Minimisation ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Contextual Features ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract Background: Despite significant reductions in mortality, preventable and treatable conditions remain leading causes of death and illness in children aged under five in South Africa. The PACK Child intervention, comprising a clinical decision support tool (guide), training strategy and health systems strengthening components, was developed to expand on WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness programme, and in 2017-2018 was piloted in 10 primary healthcare facilities in the Western Cape Province. Here we report findings from an investigation into the contextual features of South African primary care that shaped how clinicians delivered the PACK Child intervention within clinical consultations. Methods: Process evaluation using semi-structured interviews, focus groups, observation, audio-recorded consultations and documentary analysis. Linguistic ethnographic analysis of relationship between primary care contextual features and clinician-caregiver interactions.Results: Primary healthcare facilities demonstrated dominance of a risk minimisation approach upheld by provincial documentation, providing curative episodic care to children presenting with acute symptoms, and preventive care including immunisations, feeding and growth monitoring, all in children 5 years or younger. Children with chronic illnesses such as asthma rarely received routine care. These contextual features constrained the ability of clinicians to use the PACK Child intervention to facilitate diagnosis of long-term conditions, elicit and manage psychosocial issues, and navigate use of the guide alongside provincial documentation. Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence that PACK Child is catalysing a transition to an approach that strikes a balance between risk minimisation on the day of an acute presentation and a larger remit of care for the child over time. However, to optimise success of the intervention requires reviewing priorities for paediatric care which will facilitate enhanced skills, knowledge and deployment of clinical staff to better address acute illnesses and long-term health conditions of children of all ages, as well as complex psychosocial issues surrounding the child.

scholarly journals Strengthening the quality of paediatric primary care: A process evaluation of a complex health systems intervention in South Africa

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Leigh Curran ◽  
Jamie Murdoch ◽  
Ruth Vania Cornick ◽  
Sandra Picken ◽  
Max Bachmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Integrated Management ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Paediatric Primary Care ◽  
Child Intervention

Abstract BACKGROUND: Innovative strategies like WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) have resulted in progress in addressing infant and child mortality. However, the needs of children continue to present a burden upon primary healthcare services. The capacity of services and quality of care offered require greater support to address these needs and extend integrated curative and preventive care, specifically, for the well child, the child with a long-term health condition and the child older than 5 years, not included in IMCI. In response to these needs, the PACK Child intervention was developed, based on a similar successful approach in adults, that expands the scope and reach of integrated management and training programmes for paediatric primary care. We report findings from the process evaluation of the integration of PACK Child intervention within the existing primary health care system. METHODS: A mixed methods process evaluation was completed in ten primary health care facilities in the Western Cape province in South Africa, where clinicians were trained to integrate PACK Child into routine practice. Qualitative data included transcribed interviews with managers, clinicians, caregivers and policymakers; audio-recordings and observational fieldnotes of training, consultations and clinic flow. Quantitative data were collected from training logs, questionnaires, and consultations. Qualitative data were analysed using linguistic ethnographic techniques, including conversation and thematic analysis. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Influence of PACK Child on clinical practice: Longer consultations, improved clinical knowledge and practice, better teamwork, strengthening of appropriate referrals and inclusion of psychosocial risk screening. Implementation fidelity of PACK Child was hindered by over-reliance on documentation and embedded checklist approach to consultations limited to acute episodic illnesses. PACK Child increased caregiver participation during consultations. CONCLUSIONS: The PACK Child intervention has strengthened primary care for children despite institutionalised care provided by a limited number of clinicians focusing on acute illness with little participation of the caregiver. With refinement of the programme, there is potential for PACK Child to strengthen paediatric care in low-resource settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document