scholarly journals MAÏA® Topical Repellent Ointment Provides Long-Lasting Protection Against Anopheles Gambiae s.s., Anopheles Arabiensis and Aedes Aegypti Under Semi-Field Conditions in Tanzania

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Mbuba ◽  
Olukayode Odufuwa ◽  
Frank Tenywa ◽  
Rose Philipo ◽  
Mgeni Tambwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aedes Aegypti ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Protective Efficacy ◽  
Latin Square ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Complete Protection ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae S.S ◽  
Outdoor Biting ◽  
Duration Of Protection

Abstract Background: N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) topical mosquito repellents are effective personal protection tools. However, DEET repellents tend to have low consumer acceptability because they are cosmetically unappealing. More attractive formulations are needed to encourage regular compliance. This study evaluated the protective efficacy and duration of protection of a new topical repellent ointment, MAÏA® compared to 20% DEET in ethanol using malaria and dengue mosquito vectors in Tanzania.Methods: Fully balanced 3x3 Latin square design studies were conducted in large semi-field chambers using laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae s.s, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti. Human volunteers applied either MAÏA® ointment, 20% DEET or ethanol to their lower limbs six hours before the start of tests. Approximately 100 mosquitoes per strain per replicate were released inside each chamber, with 25 mosquitoes released at regular intervals during the collection period to maintain adequate biting pressure throughout the test. Volunteers recaptured mosquitoes landing on their lower limbs for six hours over a period of six to 12-hours post-application of repellents. Data analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression.Results: The protective efficacy of MAÏA® and 20% DEET was not different for each of the mosquito strains: 95.9% vs 97.4% against An. gambiae (OR=1.53 [95% CI: 0.93–2.51] p=0.091); 96.8% vs 97.2% against An. arabiensis (OR =1.08 [95% CI: 0.66 –1.77] P=0.757); 93.1% vs 94.6% against Ae. aegypti (OR=0.76 [95% CI: 0.20-2.80] p=0.675). Average complete protection time (CPT) of MAÏA® and that of DEET was similar for each of the mosquito strains: 571.6 minutes (95% CI: 558.3-584.8) vs 575.0 minutes (95% CI: 562.1-587.9) against An. gambiae; 585.6 minutes (95% CI: 571.4-599.8) vs 580.9 minutes (95% CI: 571.1-590.7) against An. arabiensis; 444.1 minutes (95% CI: 401.8-486.5) vs 436.9 minutes (95% CI: 405.2-468.5) against Ae. aegypti.Conclusions: MAÏA® repellent ointment provides complete protection for 9 hours against both An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and 7 hours against Ae. aegypti similar to 20% DEET (in ethanol). MAÏA® repellent ointment can be recommended as a tool for prevention of outdoor biting mosquitoes in tropical locations with a suggested reapplication time of 6 hours.

scholarly journals Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA® topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae s.s., Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Mbuba ◽  
Olukayode Odufuwa ◽  
Frank Tenywa ◽  
Rose Philipo ◽  
Mgeni Tambwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aedes Aegypti ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Protective Efficacy ◽  
Latin Square ◽  
Field Evaluation ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Complete Protection ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae S.S ◽  
Regular User ◽  
Outdoor Biting

Abstract Background: N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) topical mosquito repellents are effective personal protection tools. However, DEET-based repellents tend to have low consumer acceptability because they are cosmetically unappealing. More attractive formulations are needed to encourage regular user compliance. This study evaluated the protective efficacy and protection duration of a new topical repellent ointment containing 15% DEET, MAÏA® compared to 20% DEET in ethanol using malaria and dengue mosquito vectors in Bagamoyo Tanzania.Methods: Fully balanced 3x3 Latin square design studies were conducted in large semi-field chambers using laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae s.s, An. arabiensis and Aedes aegypti. Human volunteers applied either MAÏA® ointment, 20% DEET or ethanol to their lower limbs six hours before the start of tests. Approximately 100 mosquitoes per strain per replicate were released inside each chamber, with 25 mosquitoes released at regular intervals during the collection period to maintain adequate biting pressure throughout the test. Volunteers recaptured mosquitoes landing on their lower limbs for six hours over a period of six to 12-hours post-application of repellents. Data analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression.Results: The protective efficacy of MAÏA® and 20% DEET was not different for each of the mosquito strains: 95.9% vs 97.4% against An. gambiae (OR=1.53 [95% CI: 0.93–2.51] p=0.091); 96.8% vs 97.2% against An. arabiensis (OR =1.08 [95% CI: 0.66 –1.77] P=0.757); 93.1% vs 94.6% against Ae. aegypti (OR=0.76 [95% CI: 0.20-2.80] p=0.675). Average complete protection time (CPT) of MAÏA® and that of DEET was similar for each of the mosquito strains: 571.6 minutes (95% CI: 558.3-584.8) vs 575.0 minutes (95% CI: 562.1-587.9) against An. gambiae; 585.6 minutes (95% CI: 571.4-599.8) vs 580.9 minutes (95% CI: 571.1-590.7) against An. arabiensis; 444.1 minutes (95% CI: 401.8-486.5) vs 436.9 minutes (95% CI: 405.2-468.5) against Ae. aegypti.Conclusions: MAÏA® repellent ointment provides complete protection for 9 hours against both An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and 7 hours against Ae. aegypti similar to 20% DEET (in ethanol). MAÏA® repellent ointment can be recommended to be used as a tool for prevention of outdoor biting mosquitoes in tropical locations as it protects for more than 6 hours.

scholarly journals Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA® topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Mbuba ◽  
Olukayode G. Odufuwa ◽  
Frank C. Tenywa ◽  
Rose Philipo ◽  
Mgeni M. Tambwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aedes Aegypti ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Protective Efficacy ◽  
Latin Square ◽  
Field Evaluation ◽  
Sensu Stricto ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Complete Protection ◽  
Regular User

Abstract Background N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) topical mosquito repellents are effective personal protection tools. However, DEET-based repellents tend to have low consumer acceptability because they are cosmetically unappealing. More attractive formulations are needed to encourage regular user compliance. This study evaluated the protective efficacy and protection duration of a new topical repellent ointment containing 15% DEET, MAÏA® compared to 20% DEET in ethanol using malaria and dengue mosquito vectors in Bagamoyo Tanzania. Methods Fully balanced 3 × 3 Latin square design studies were conducted in large semi-field chambers using laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti. Human volunteers applied either MAÏA® ointment, 20% DEET or ethanol to their lower limbs 6 h before the start of tests. Approximately 100 mosquitoes per strain per replicate were released inside each chamber, with 25 mosquitoes released at regular intervals during the collection period to maintain adequate biting pressure throughout the test. Volunteers recaptured mosquitoes landing on their lower limbs for 6 h over a period of 6 to 12-h post-application of repellents. Data analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression. Results The protective efficacy of MAÏA® and 20% DEET was not statistically different for each of the mosquito strains: 95.9% vs. 97.4% against An. gambiae (OR = 1.53 [95% CI 0.93–2.51] p = 0.091); 96.8% vs 97.2% against An. arabiensis (OR = 1.08 [95% CI 0.66–1.77] p = 0.757); 93.1% vs 94.6% against Ae. aegypti (OR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.20–2.80] p = 0.675). Average complete protection time (CPT) in minutes of MAÏA® and that of DEET was similar for each of the mosquito strains: 571.6 min (95% CI 558.3–584.8) vs 575.0 min (95% CI 562.1–587.9) against An. gambiae; 585.6 min (95% CI 571.4–599.8) vs 580.9 min (95% CI 571.1–590.7) against An. arabiensis; 444.1 min (95% CI 401.8–486.5) vs 436.9 min (95% CI 405.2–468.5) against Ae. aegypti. Conclusions MAÏA® repellent ointment provides complete protection for 9 h against both An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and 7 h against Ae. aegypti similar to 20% DEET (in ethanol). MAÏA® repellent ointment can be recommended as a tool for prevention against outdoor biting mosquitoes in tropical locations where the majority of the people spend an ample time outdoor before going to bed.

scholarly journals Single blinded semi-field evaluation of MAÏA® topical repellent ointment compared to unformulated 20% DEET against Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti in Tanzania

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Mbuba ◽  
Olukayode Odufuwa ◽  
Frank Tenywa ◽  
Rose Philipo ◽  
Mgeni Tambwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aedes Aegypti ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Protective Efficacy ◽  
Latin Square ◽  
Field Evaluation ◽  
Sensu Stricto ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Complete Protection ◽  
Regular User ◽  
Outdoor Biting

Abstract Background N, N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) topical mosquito repellents are effective personal protection tools. However, DEET-based repellents tend to have low consumer acceptability because they are cosmetically unappealing. More attractive formulations are needed to encourage regular user compliance. This study evaluated the protective efficacy and protection duration of a new topical repellent ointment containing 15% DEET, MAÏA® compared to 20% DEET in ethanol using malaria and dengue mosquito vectors in Bagamoyo Tanzania.Methods Fully balanced 3x3 Latin square design studies were conducted in large semi-field chambers using laboratory strains of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto, Anopheles arabiensis and Aedes aegypti. Human volunteers applied either MAÏA® ointment, 20% DEET or ethanol to their lower limbs six hours before the start of tests. Approximately 100 mosquitoes per strain per replicate were released inside each chamber, with 25 mosquitoes released at regular intervals during the collection period to maintain adequate biting pressure throughout the test. Volunteers recaptured mosquitoes landing on their lower limbs for six hours over a period of six to 12-hours post-application of repellents. Data analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression.Results The protective efficacy of MAÏA® and 20% DEET was not different for each of the mosquito strains: 95.9% vs 97.4% against An. gambiae (OR=1.53 [95% CI: 0.93–2.51] p=0.091); 96.8% vs 97.2% against An. arabiensis (OR =1.08 [95% CI: 0.66 –1.77] P=0.757); 93.1% vs 94.6% against Ae. aegypti (OR=0.76 [95% CI: 0.20-2.80] p=0.675). Average complete protection time (CPT) of MAÏA® and that of DEET was similar for each of the mosquito strains: 571.6 minutes (95% CI: 558.3-584.8) vs 575.0 minutes (95% CI: 562.1-587.9) against An. gambiae; 585.6 minutes (95% CI: 571.4-599.8) vs 580.9 minutes (95% CI: 571.1-590.7) against An. arabiensis; 444.1 minutes (95% CI: 401.8-486.5) vs 436.9 minutes (95% CI: 405.2-468.5) against Ae. aegypti.Conclusions MAÏA® repellent ointment provides complete protection for 9 hours against both An. gambiae and An. arabiensis, and 7 hours against Ae. aegypti similar to 20% DEET (in ethanol). MAÏA® repellent ointment can be recommended to be used as a tool for prevention of outdoor biting mosquitoes in tropical locations as it protects for more than 6 hours.

scholarly journals Rapid high throughput SYBR green assay for identifying the malaria vectors Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae s.s. Giles

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0215669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Chabi ◽  
Arjen Van’t Hof ◽  
Louis K. N’dri ◽  
Alex Datsomor ◽  
Dora Okyere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Sybr Green ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Anopheles Coluzzii ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae S.S ◽  
Sybr Green Assay

scholarly journals Semi-field evaluation of freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators and the BG sentinel trap as a “Push-Pull control strategy” against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mgeni Mohamed Tambwe ◽  
Sarah Moore ◽  
Hassan Chilumba ◽  
Johnson Kyeba Swai ◽  
Jason Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aedes Aegypti ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Protective Efficacy ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Human Landing Catch ◽  
Pull System ◽  
Outdoor Biting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Human Landing ◽  
Bg Sentinel

Abstract Background: Spatial repellents that drive mosquitoes away from treated area, and odour-baited traps, that attract and kill mosquitoes, can be combined and work synergistically in a push-pull system. Push-pull systems have shown to reduce house entry and outdoor biting rates of malaria vectors and so have the potential to control other outdoor biting mosquitoes such as Aedes aegypti that transmit arboviral diseases. In this study, semi-field experiments were conducted to evaluate whether a push-pull system could be used to reduce bites from Aedes . Methods: The push and pull under investigation consisted of two freestanding transfluthrin passive emanators (FTPE), and a BG sentinel trap (BGS) respectively. The FTPE contained hessian strips treated with 5.25g of transfluthrin active ingredient. The efficacies of FTPE and BGS alone and in combination were evaluated by human landing catch in a large semi-field system in Tanzania. We also investigated the protection of FTPE over six months. The data was analyzed using generalized linear mixed models with binomial distribution. Results: Two FTPE have a protective efficacy (PE) of 61. 2% (95% Confidence interval (CI): 52.2-69.9) against human landing rate of Aedes aegypti . The BGS did not significantly reduce mosquito landings; the PE was 2.1% (95% CI: -2.9-7.2). The combination of FTPE and BGS (push-pull) provided the PE of 64.5% (95% CI: 59.1-69.9). However, there was no significant difference in the protective efficacy between the push-pull and the two FTPE against Ae. aegypti (p=0.30). The FTPE offered significant protection against Ae. aegypti at month three, with a PE of 46.4% (95% CI: 41.1-51.8), but not at six months with a PE of 2.2 % (95% CI: -9.0-14.0). Conclusions: The protective efficacy of the FTPE and the full push-pull system are similar, indicative that bite prevention is primarily due to the activity of the FTPE. While these results are encouraging for the FTPE, further work is needed for a push-pull system to be recommended for Ae. aegypti control. The three-month protection provided by the FTPE against Ae. aegypti bites suggests it would be a useful additional personal protection tool during dengue outbreaks, that does not require regular user compliance.

scholarly journals Multimodal Pyrethroid Resistance in Malaria Vectors, Anopheles gambiae s.s., Anopheles arabiensis, and Anopheles funestus s.s. in Western Kenya

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. e22574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitoshi Kawada ◽  
Gabriel O. Dida ◽  
Kazunori Ohashi ◽  
Osamu Komagata ◽  
Shinji Kasai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Pyrethroid Resistance ◽  
Anopheles Funestus ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae S.S ◽  
Western Kenya

scholarly journals Evaluating preservation methods for identifying Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis complex mosquitoes species using near infra-red spectroscopy

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeriana Mayagaya ◽  
Alex Ntamatungiro ◽  
Sarah Moore ◽  
Robert Wirtz ◽  
Floyd Dowell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae S.S ◽  
Preservation Methods ◽  
Infra Red

scholarly journals Distribution of Members of the Anopheles Gamibiae s.l. In Oyo State, South West Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-144
Author(s):  
Adedapo O. Adeogun ◽  
Kehinde O.K. Popoola ◽  
Abiodun K. Olakiigbe ◽  
Samson T. Awolola
Keyword(s):  
Vector Control ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Anopheles Arabiensis ◽  
Habitat Type ◽  
The State ◽  
Anopheles Coluzzii ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae S.S ◽  
Breeding Sites ◽  
Anopheles Mosquitoes ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae S.L

Background: Members of the Anopheles gambiae s.l. remain the most efficient vectors of malaria parasite in Africa. However, for timely and effective vector control activities, the distribution of these important vectors in local communities is crucial. We therefore determine the distribution of the members of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Oyo State, Nigeria Methods: Larval stages of Anopheles mosquitoes were collected from identified mosquito breeding sites in six localities (Oluyole, Eruwa, Oyo, Ojoo, Bodija, and Ogbomoso) in Oyo State and reared to adults. Three to five days old adult emergence were identified morphologically using standard methods. A total of 100 mosquitoes were selected from each of localities for molecular analysis. DNA were extracted and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR-ID) followed by restriction endonucleases digestion was used for molecular identification. Results: A total of 58 larval breeding sites were sampled out of which 12 (20.7%) had Anophelines only, 21 (36.2%) contained Culicines only and the remaining 25 (43.1%) had both Anophelines and Culicines. The mosquitoes were mostly found in footprints, followed by tire tracks, pools, puddle and ponds. The habitat type distribution for Anopheline and Culicines were not different (χ2=5.25, DF=5, P>0.01). A total of 1,725 Anophelines emerged from the collection out of which, 823 were females. All the female samples were morphologically identified as members of the Anopheles gambiae s.l.. A total of 600 (72.9%) of the female Anopheline population was subjected to PCR. PCR-ID showed that the mosquito populations contained higher numbers of Anopheles arabiensis (58%) than Anopheles gambiae s.s. (42%). Enzyme digest indicate that samples from Oluyole, Iwo road and Bodija were man-ly the M form (now called An. coluzzii), while both M (An. colizzii) and S (An. gambiae) form occur in sympatry in Oyo town and Eruwa. Conclusion: This study presents information on the distribution of Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae in Oyo State. This has implication on the vector control activities in the State as members of these Anopheles mosquitoes exhibit varying feeding behaviours, transmission pattern and resistance profiles. Such information is useful in planning vector control activities for the State

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document