scholarly journals The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Jasinski ◽  
Karol Miszalski-Jamka ◽  
Radoslaw Gocol ◽  
Izabella Wenzel-Jasinska ◽  
Grzegorz Bielicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replaced or repaired using various surgical techniques. This study sought to assess the efficacy of external annuloplasty and postoperative reverse remodeling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the mid-term results of external and subcommissural annuloplasty. Methods: Out of a total of 200 BAV repair performed between 2004 and 2018, 21 consecutive patients (median age 54 years) with regurgitation requiring valve repair with annuloplasty without concomitant aortic root surgery were prospectively referred for CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) one year after the operation. Two aortic annulus stabilization techniques were used: external, circumferential annuloplasty (EA), and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA). Results: 11 patients received EA and 10 patients were treated using SCA. There was no in-hospital mortality and all patients survived the follow-up period. CMR showed strong correlation between postoperative aortic recurrent regurgitant fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r=0.62; p=0.003) as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (r=-0.53; p=0.01). Patients treated with EA as compared with SCA had larger anatomic aortic valve area measured by CMR (3.5cm2 (2.5; 4.0) vs. 2.5cm2 (2.0; 3.4); p=0.04). In both EA and SCA group, aortic valve area below 3.5cm2 correlated with no regurgitation recurrency. EA (vs. SCA) was associated with lower peak transvalvular aortic gradients (10mmHg (6; 17) vs. 21mmHg (15; 27); p=0.04). Conclusions: The repair of the bicuspid aortic valve provides significant mid-term postoperative reverse remodeling, provided no recurrent regurgitation and durable reduction annuloplasty can be achieved. External, circumferential annuloplasty is associated with better hemodynamics compared to subcommissural annuloplasty.

scholarly journals The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Jasinski ◽  
Karol Miszalski-Jamka ◽  
Kinga Kosiorowska ◽  
Radoslaw Gocol ◽  
Izabella Wenzel-Jasinska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Reverse Remodelling ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background: The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replaced or repaired using various surgical techniques. This study sought to assess the efficacy of external annuloplasty and postoperative reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the results of external and subcommissural annuloplasty. Methods: Out of a total of 200 BAV repair performed between 2004 and 2018, 21 consecutive patients (median age 54 years) with regurgitation requiring valve repair with annuloplasty without concomitant aortic root surgery were prospectively referred for CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) one year after the operation. Two aortic annulus stabilization techniques were used: external, circumferential annuloplasty (EA), and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA). Results: 11 patients received EA and 10 patients were treated using SCA. There was no in-hospital mortality and all patients survived the follow-up period (median: 12.6 months (first quartile: 6.6; third quartile: 14.1). CMR showed strong correlation between postoperative aortic recurrent regurgitant fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.62; p = 0.003) as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.53; p = 0.01). Patients treated with EA as compared with SCA had larger anatomic aortic valve area measured by CMR (3.5 (2.5; 4.0) vs. 2.5 cm2 (2.0; 3.4); p = 0.04). In both EA and SCA group, aortic valve area below 3.5 cm2 correlated with no regurgitation recurrency. EA (vs. SCA) was associated with lower peak transvalvular aortic gradients (10 (6; 17) vs. 21mmHg (15; 27); p = 0.04). Conclusions: The repair of the bicuspid aortic valve provides significant postoperative reverse remodelling, provided no recurrent regurgitation and durable reduction annuloplasty can be achieved. EA is associated with lower transvalvular gradients and higher aortic valve area assessed by CMR, compared to SCA.

scholarly journals The evaluation of annuloplasty in bicuspid aortic valve repair using cardiac magnetic resonance

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek J. Jasinski ◽  
Karol Miszalski-Jamka ◽  
Kinga Kosiorowska ◽  
Radoslaw Gocol ◽  
Izabella Wenzel-Jasinska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Reverse Remodelling ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background The incompetent bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) can be replaced or repaired using various surgical techniques. This study sought to assess the efficacy of external annuloplasty and postoperative reverse remodelling using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compare the results of external and subcommissural annuloplasty. Methods Out of a total of 200 BAV repair performed between 2004 and 2018, 21 consecutive patients (median age 54 years) with regurgitation requiring valve repair with annuloplasty without concomitant aortic root surgery were prospectively referred for CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) one year after the operation. Two aortic annulus stabilization techniques were used: external, circumferential annuloplasty (EA), and subcommissural annuloplasty (SCA). Results 11 patients received EA and 10 patients were treated using SCA. There was no in-hospital mortality and all patients survived the follow-up period (median: 12.6 months (first quartile: 6.6; third quartile: 14.1). CMR showed strong correlation between postoperative aortic recurrent regurgitant fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.62; p = 0.003) as well as left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.53; p = 0.01). Patients treated with EA as compared with SCA had larger anatomic aortic valve area measured by CMR (3.5 (2.5; 4.0) vs. 2.5 cm2 (2.0; 3.4); p = 0.04). In both EA and SCA group, aortic valve area below 3.5 cm2 correlated with no regurgitation recurrency. EA (vs. SCA) was associated with lower peak transvalvular aortic gradients (10 (6; 17) vs. 21 mmHg (15; 27); p = 0.04). Conclusions The repair of the bicuspid aortic valve provides significant postoperative reverse remodelling, provided no recurrent regurgitation and durable reduction annuloplasty can be achieved. EA is associated with lower transvalvular gradients and higher aortic valve area assessed by CMR, compared to SCA.

scholarly journals P349 Utility and prognostic value of aortic valve area by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with aortic stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Igual Munoz ◽  
O B H Oscar Blanco Herrera ◽  
F J V M Francisco Jose Valera Martinez ◽  
D D V Diana Domingo Valero ◽  
P S S Pilar Sepulveda Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Phase Contrast ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Classically clinical evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is made using clinical and echocardiographic parameters but recently new imaging techniques as cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR ) are being used increasingly in this clinical setting. We aim to assess utility and prognostic value of aortic valve area (AVA) by CMR in patients with AS regarding echocardiographic data. METHODS a retrospective cohort of patients with AS referred to CMR and cardiac echocardiography study for evaluation were included. Patients with known coronary artery disease or another significant valve disease were excluded. Clinical Follow up was performed to asses cardiovascular death, hospital admission or aortic valve replacement at the first year after imaging evaluation. Furthermore symptomatic status was assessed. Echocardiographic severity was estimated used peak and mean gradients . Additionally a CMR study including b-SSFPS for left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification and phase-contrast sequences acquired at aortic valve plane to analyze aortic valve area (AVA) by planimetry was performed. RESULTS ninety eight patients, mean age 67+ 15 years, 52(58%) males, 23 (25%) with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. A significant negative correlation was observed between AVA by CMR and echocardiographic gradients ( -0.49 for mean gradient and -0.58 for peak gradient). AVA was strongly associated to symptomatic status (AUROC curve 0.66, p < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression model including echocardiographic gradients,CMR, LVEF and AVA was performed and mean gradient ( OR:1.02 p = 0.01) and AVA (OR: 0.002 p = 0.001) were shown to be independent predictors of events. Conclusion 1.AVA by planimetry in phase-contrast CMR sequences is a valid tool to asses severity of aortic valve stenosis . 2 AVA was strongly associated to symptomatic status.3. AVA has proven to have additional prognostic value beyond echocardiographic gradients. Abstract P349 Figure. Aortic valve area by planimetry by MR

scholarly journals Dimensionless Index in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Altes ◽  
Nicolas Thellier ◽  
Dan Rusinaru ◽  
Wassima Marsou ◽  
Yohann Bohbot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Valve Area

Background Risk stratification of patients with low-gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remains challenging. We sought to evaluate the relationship between the dimensionless index (DI)—the ratio of the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral to that of the aortic valve jet—and mortality in these patients. Methods Seven hundred fifty-five patients with LG severe AS (defined by aortic valve area ≤1 cm 2 or aortic valve area indexed to body surface area ≤0.6 cm 2 /m 2 and mean aortic pressure gradient <40 mm Hg) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% were studied. Flow status was defined according to stroke volume index <35 mL/m 2 (low flow, LF) or ≥35 mL/m 2 (normal flow, NF). Results After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, history of hypertension, history of atrial fibrillation, AS-related symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction, indexed left ventricular ventricular mass, aortic valve area, and aortic valve replacement as a time-dependent covariate, patients with LG-LF and DI<0.25 exhibited a considerable increased risk of death compared with patients with LG-NF and DI≥0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.61–3.62]; P <0.001), LG-NF and DI<0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.24–2.73]; P =0.003), and LG-LF and D≥0.25 (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.42–3.63]; P <0.001). In contrast, patients with LG-LF and DI≥0.25, LG-NF and DI<0.25, and LG-NF and DI≥0.25 had similar outcome. DI<0.25 showed incremental prognostic value in patients with LG-LF severe AS but not in patients with LG-NF severe AS. Conclusions Among patients with LG severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased DI<0.25 is a reliable parameter in patients with LF to identify a subgroup of patients at higher risk of death who may derive benefit from aortic valve replacement.

scholarly journals Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1436-1443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Catherine Pouleur ◽  
Jean-Benoît le Polain de Waroux ◽  
Agnès Pasquet ◽  
David Vancraeynest ◽  
Jean-Louis J. Vanoverschelde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Continuity Equation ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Valve Area

scholarly journals Clinical Value of Stress Transaortic Flow Rate During Dobutamine Echocardiography in Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: A Multicenter Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Vamvakidou ◽  
Mohamed-Salah Annabi ◽  
Phillipe Pibarot ◽  
Edyta Plonska-Gosciniak ◽  
Ana G. Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Valve Area

Background: Low rest transaortic flow rate (FR) has been shown previously to predict mortality in low-gradient aortic stenosis. However limited prognostic data exists on stress FR during low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography. We aimed to assess the value of stress FR for the detection of aortic valve stenosis (AS) severity and the prediction of mortality. Methods: This is a multicenter cohort study of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and low-gradient aortic stenosis (aortic valve area <1 cm 2 and mean gradient <40 mm Hg) who underwent low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography to identify the AS severity and presence of flow reserve. The outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Of the 287 patients (mean age, 75±10 years; males, 71%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 31±10%) over a mean follow-up of 24±30 months there were 127 (44.3%) deaths and 147 (51.2%) patients underwent aortic valve intervention. Higher stress FR was independently associated with reduced risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94–0.99]; P =0.01) after adjusting for age, chronic kidney disease, heart failure symptoms, aortic valve intervention, and rest left ventricular ejection fraction. The minimum cutoff for prediction of mortality was stress FR 210 mL/s. Following adjustment to the same important clinical and echocardiographic parameters, among the three criteria of AS severity during stress, ie, the guideline definition of aortic valve area <1cm 2 and aortic valve mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or aortic valve mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg, or the novel definition of aortic valve area <1 cm 2 at stress FR ≥210 mL/s, only the latter was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.05–2.82]; P =0.03). Furthermore aortic valve area <1cm 2 at stress FR ≥210 mL/s was the only severe aortic stenosis criterion that was associated with improved outcome following aortic valve intervention ( P <0.001). Guideline-defined stroke volume flow reserve did not predict mortality. Conclusions: Stress FR during low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography was useful for the detection of both AS severity and flow reserve and was associated with improved prediction of outcome following aortic valve intervention.

Abstract 15609: Risk of Aortic Valve Disease and Aortopathy in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Referred to a Central County Hospital in Denmark

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Procida ◽  
Riina Oksjoki ◽  
Sandra Wulffeld ◽  
Dorthe Guldbrand Nielsen ◽  
Soren Schmiegelow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Bicuspid Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Valve Disease ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are at increased risk of developing severe aortic valve disease and aortopathy at an early age. We therefore performed a retrospective study to describe all patients diagnosed with BAV in an entire region of Denmark. Methods: We included patients≥18 years old with BAV, who had a transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at our hospital before May 2020, and through electronic health records and our echocardiography database, we achieved baseline data. Results: A total of 545 patients with BAV (74.1% men) were identified. At the time of BAV diagnosis the median age was 54 years (IQR 42-62), and the causes for referral to TTE were primarily chest discomfort (21.1%), dyspnea (17.6%), or a newly discovered murmur (40.0%). Upon diagnosis 19.3% of the patients had an aortic valve area (AVA)<1,0 cm 2 , 2.4% had severe aortic regurgitation and the majority (84.0%) had normal left ventricular ejection fraction. The ascending aorta was dilated in 51.9% of the patients while aortic coarctation was found in 5.1% of all patients. According to Sievers BAV classification 24.4% (N=133) had Type 0, 58.7% (N=320) had Type 1 left/right(L/R) fusion, 10.6% (N=58) had Type 1 right/noncoronary (R/N) fusion, 2.6% (N=14) had Type 1 left/noncoronary (L/N) fusion and 2.2% (N=12) had Type 2. Coexisting diabetes mellitus (10.1%), ischemic heart disease (13.2%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10.1%) was low, whereas hypertension was frequent (47.9%). The majority had sinus rhythm (75.6%) and normal eGFR (84.4%). Surgery was performed in 37.3% (N=203) of all patients and primarily due to aortic valve stenosis (N=172, 84.7%). Surgery was performed in a higher frequency of patients with Sievers Type 1 L/N fusion (N=9, 4.4%; 64.3% of all Type 1 L/N) and Type 2 (N=10, 4.9%, 83.3% of all Type 2) and lowest in patients with Sievers Type 0 (N=35, 17.2%; 26.3% of all Type 0). However, likelihood of surgery was only significantly different between patients with BAV Type 2 and Type 1 L/R (OR 14.21 (2.83-71.35). Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with BAV a higher fraction of patients with BAV type 1 L/N and BAV type 2 required valve replacement compared with particularly BAV type 0 suggesting important differences according to BAV subtype.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document