scholarly journals Extubation success without using high-flow nasal cannula and non-invasive ventilation for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A retrospective observational study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Inoue ◽  
Kazuhiro Shirakawa ◽  
Nonoka Fujita ◽  
Kunio Kanao ◽  
Yutaka Saito ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to be a global pandemic. It was also reported that approximately 20%-23% of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital required mechanical ventilation (MV). Reintubation rates ranged from 13–19%, leading to increased mortality. Moreover, exposure of health care workers is a serious problem and intubation is a high-risk procedure because of aerosol generation. To reduce reintubation, preventive high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) after extubation are recommended. However, using HFNC and NIV in patients with COVID-19 may lead to the spread of infection. Without using HFNC and NIV, conventional spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) may overestimate a patient’s respiratory status. A highly demanding SBT accurately assesses a patient’s reserve capacity and may reduce reintubation. We did not use preventive HFNC or NPPV and extubated with a highly demanding SBT protocol. This study aimed to evaluate whether our protocol can be performed safely.Methods This single-centre study was conducted at the Kawasaki Municipal Hospital from February 2020 to June 2020. Patients with COVID-19 requiring MV were screened for their eligibility for the weaning procedure every day. Patients were extubated after administering methylprednisolone if SBT was well tolerated. SBT was performed with 3 cmH2O pressure support, 3 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure, and ≤ 0.30 fraction of inspired oxygen. In extubated patients, the reintubation rate, duration of MV, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were analyzed.Results Ten patients received MV. Two of 10 patients had no improvement in their respiratory status and did not qualify for the extubation criteria and died. Eight patients were extubated. No reintubations were performed (0%). The median durations of MV, ICU stay, and hospital stay were 13 (interquartile range [IQR], 10–16) days, 17 (IQR, 13–27) days, and 22 (IQR, 16–26), and 3 patients (37.5%) was diagnosed VAP.Conclusions Extubation was performed with a highly demanding SBT protocol, and no patients were reintubated. All patients did not require HFNC and NIV. Further research is required in critically ill patients.

JMS SKIMS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tajamul Hussain Shah ◽  
Suhail Mantoo ◽  
Rafi Ahmad Jan

High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation The current pandemic of COVID-19 caused by novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) tested the healthcare infrastructure throughout the globe at all possible levels. Early reports suggest about 20% of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 require hospitalization and 5-8% require admission to intensive care unit (ICU) due to severe disease.Supplementation of oxygen provided by various conventional oxygen therapy (COT) devices (like nasal prongs, face mask, venture mask or non-rebreather mask) may not be sufficient in cases of worsening respiratory failure. One form of escalating respiratory support in such patients is a high flow nasal oxygenation device. High flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNC) is a form of non invasive respiratory support. It acts as a bridge between low flow devices and non invasive ventilation and may reduce the need for intubation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Purificación Pérez-Terán ◽  
Judith Marin-Corral ◽  
Irene Dot ◽  
Sergio Sans ◽  
Rosana Muñoz-Bermúdez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document