scholarly journals Sequential Treatment of Severe Airway Stenosis Caused by Esophageal Cancer by Using Airway Stent Implantation and Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Xie ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Wei He ◽  
Meipan Yin ◽  
Chunxia Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Stent Implantation ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Airway Stenosis ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Airway Stent ◽  
Airway Stenting ◽  
Transarterial Infusion ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Purpose: This study was aimed at investigating the safety and efficacy of airway stent implantation and transarterial infusion chemotherapy for the treatment of severe airway stenosis caused by esophageal cancer. Methods: Data of patients with advanced esophageal cancer complicated by severe airway stenosis treated with airway stent implantation and transarterial infusion chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Furthermore, dyspnea, clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and survival were evaluated. Results: Of the 71 patients included, 28, 43, 34, 35, and 2 patients had grade III dyspnea, grade IV dyspnea before airway stenting, grade I dyspnea, grade III dyspnea, and grade III dyspnea after airway stenting, respectively. After airway stent implantation and 1–3 courses of transarterial infusion chemotherapy, complete response, partial response, and stable disease were noted in 11, 41, and 19 patients, respectively. Total objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 73.2% and 100.0%, respectively. During follow-up, 32, 24, and 10 patients died of organ failure, tumor-related respiratory failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding, respectively. The median survival time was 8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 40.8%.Conclusions: Airway stent implantation combined with arterial infusion chemotherapy is safe and effective in the sequential treatment of esophageal cancer with severe airway stenosis.

scholarly journals Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Neoplastic Esophagogastric Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengfei Xie ◽  
Meipan Yin ◽  
Wei He ◽  
Yaozhen Ma ◽  
Chunxia Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Anastomotic Strictures ◽  
Airway Stenting ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Grade Iii

BackgroundNeoplastic esophagogastric anastomotic strictures after resection of esophageal cancer is a very difficult problem in clinical practice. We aim at to investigate the safety and feasibility of arterial infusion chemotherapy in treatment of neoplastic esophagogastric anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy.MethodsFrom October 2014 to December 2019, 50 patients with Neoplastic esophagogastric anastomotic strictures after resection of esophageal cancer were assessed retrospectively. Preoperative dysphagia was grade III in 34 cases and grade IV in 16 cases. Thirty-eight patients had different degrees of dyspnea before surgery Twenty-five patients had intolerable (grade IV) dyspnea and airway stenting was undertaken before surgery. Thirteen patients had tolerable dyspnea that did not require airway stenting, and preoperative dyspnea was grade III.ResultsAll patients were successfully treated with arterial infusion chemotherapy, no paraplegia or death occurred. The dysphagia grade of 50 patients after AIC was compared: one case had grade I, 40 cases had grade II, and nine cases had grade III. Thirteen patients had tolerable dyspnea that did not necessitate airway stenting. Dyspnea was classified as grade I in five cases and grade II in eight cases. After 1–3 courses of AIC, 50 patients were followed up for a complete response (eight cases), partial response (28) and stable disease (14 cases). Total objective effective rate (complete response+ partial response) and disease control rate(complete response + partial response + stable disease)were 72.0% and 100.0%, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 8.5 months. One-year survival was 46.0%.ConclusionArterial infusion chemotherapy is safe and efficacious treatment for Neoplastic esophagogastric anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy.

scholarly journals Stent placement combined with intraluminal radiofrequency ablation and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancers with biliary obstruction: a multicentre, retrospective, controlled study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Gou ◽  
Lingeng Wu ◽  
Wei Cui ◽  
Zhiqiang Mo ◽  
Dejin Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of stent placement combined with intraluminal radiofrequency ablation (intra-RFA) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (Ad-BTCs) and biliary obstruction (BO). Methods We retrospectively reviewed data for patients with Ad-BTCs and BO who underwent stent placement with or without intra-RFA and HAIC in three centres between November 2013 and November 2018. The stent patency time (SPT), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analysed. Results Of the 135 enrolled patients, 64 underwent stent placement combined with intra-RFA and HAIC, while 71 underwent only stent placement. The median SPT was significantly longer in the combination group (8.2 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1–9.3) than in the control group (4.3 months, 95% CI: 3.6–5.0; p < 0.001). A similar result was observed for OS (combination: 13.2 months, 95% CI: 11.1–16.5; control: 8.5 months, 95% CI: 7.6–9.6; p < 0.001). The incidence of AEs related to biliary tract operation was not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). The most common AE and serious AE related to HAIC were alanine aminotransferase elevation (24/64; 37.5%) and thrombocytopenia (8/64; 12.5%), respectively. All AEs were tolerable, and there was no death from AEs. Conclusions Stent placement combined with intra-RFA and HAIC may be a safe, potential treatment strategy for patients with Ad-BTCs and BO. Key Points • Advanced biliary cancers (Ad-BTCs) with biliary obstruction (BO) can rapidly result in liver failure and cachexia with an extremely poor prognosis. • Stent placement combined with intraluminal radiofrequency ablation and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy may be safe and effective for patients with Ad-BTCs and BO. • The long-term efficacy and safety of the combined treatment is promising.

scholarly journals Clinical Benefits of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1882
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamasaki ◽  
Issei Saeki ◽  
Yurika Kotoh-Yamauchi ◽  
Ryo Sasaki ◽  
Norikazu Tanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Vascular Invasion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Infusion Chemotherapy ◽  
Recent Success ◽  
Clinical Benefits

Recent success of systemic therapeutic agents, including combination immunotherapy, could promote a change in the treatment strategy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a treatment option for advanced HCC in Japan, it is not recommended by other guidelines. We discuss the clinical benefits of HAIC compared to sorafenib. The clinical benefits of HAIC are as follows: (1) even a patient with Child–Pugh B HCC (7 or 8 points) is a candidate for HAIC (2) Child–Pugh scores barely decline with the use of HAIC compared with sorafenib (3) HAIC is highly effective in patients with vascular invasion compared with sorafenib; and (4) survival in patients receiving HAIC may not be associated with skeletal muscle volume. In contrast, the disadvantages are problems related with the reservoir system. HAIC has clinical benefits in a subpopulation of patients without extrahepatic metastasis with Child–Pugh A HCC and vascular invasion (especially primary branch invasion or main portal vein invasion) or with Child–Pugh B HCC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document