scholarly journals Curative Effect of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhui Zhang ◽  
Weiqiang Sun ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhang ◽  
Fengguang Yang ◽  
Yuping Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Curative Effect ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Antituberculous Drug ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Objective: This research aimed to investigate the curative effect of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis. Methods: A total of 32 patients, including 18 males and 14 females (29-58 years old, with the mean age of 47) who were admitted to our hospital from October 2016 to June 2020 and treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with vertebral screw internal fixation, were retrospectively collected. The segmental distribution of lesions was L2- L316 cases, L3-L411 cases and L4-L55 cases. At first, preoperative antituberculous drug treatment was standardized for 2-4 weeks. Furthermore, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative complications, ESR, CRP, VAS, JOA and ASIA scores were recorded before and after surgery and at the last follow-up. In addition, antituberculous drug therapy was regulated continuously after surgery.Results: All patients were followed up for 12-17 months, with an average of 14 months. ① The average operation time was (132.5±21.4) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (227.3±43.1) ml. ② Preoperative ESR was (74.56±15.43) mmol/h, and CRP was (43.21±19.37) mg/L. Seven days after surgery, ESR was (42.37±19.26) mmol/h, and CRP was (22.51±18.42) mg/L. In the last follow-up, ESR was (9.25±4.13) mmol/h, and CRP was (8.17±3.21) mg/L. They have statistically significant differences before surgery, seven days after the surgery and in the last follow-up (P<0.05). ③ The average VAS score before surgery was (7.21±1.40) points, the average JOA score was (18.24±4.13) points, the average VAS score seven days after surgery was (2.23±1.32) points, the average JOA score was (24.72±3.19) points, and the average VAS score in the last follow-up was (1.63±0.54) points. JOA score was (27.72±2.61). They have statistically significant differences before surgery, seven days after the surgery and in the last follow-up (P<0.05) ④Six patients had neurologic symptoms with ASIA grade D before surgery, 2 patients recovered to Grade E seven days after surgery, and the remaining 4 patients also recovered to grade E in the last follow-up. Besides, 26 patients were graded as Grade E before surgery, seven days after surgery and in the last follow-up. ⑤ After surgery, 1 patient suffered psoas major muscle damage, which was manifested as reduced hip flexion strength of the lower extremity, and returned to normal three weeks later. Apart from that, none of the patients had complications such as abdominal organ injury and poor wound healing. Conclusion: OLIF is a new minimally invasive method for treating lumbar tuberculosis, with short operation time, less blood loss, convenient operation, thorough removal of lesions, and good long-term follow-up effect. It is worthy of promotion and application.

scholarly journals Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Preliminary Clinical Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-dong Li ◽  
Shi-Tong Xing ◽  
Ji-Kang Min ◽  
Xiang-Qian Fang ◽  
Shun-Wu Fan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive indirect decompression technique for the treatment of lumar spine disease. The OLIF has usually combined with supplemental posterior pedicle screw fixation for decreasing the perioperative complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with lateral plate instrumentation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods From May 2020 to August 2020, the clinical data of 20 patients who underwent OLIF combined with lateral plate instrumentation were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, blood loss, and the complications were recorded. Also, the radiological parameters, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated before and after surgery.Results The average operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 75.41±11.53 min, 39.57±9.22 ml, and 7.22±1.85 days, respectively. The VAS and ODI had both significantly improved after surgery (7.23±1.26 VS 2.15±0.87; 60.27±7.91 VS 21.80±6.32, P < 0.001). The postoperative disk height (DH) was 13.02±8.83 mm, which is much higher than before (P < 0.001); The postoperative foraminal height (FH) improved significantly (16.18±3.49 VS 21.54±2.12 mm, P < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area (CSA) had improved from 88.95±14.79 mm2 to 126.53±8.83 mm2 (P < 0.001). The radiological fusion rate was 95% at the last follow-up, while cage subsidence was found in one case. No major complications, such as ureteral injury, vascular injury and vertebral body fracture occurred.Conclusions OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation can avoid the lumbar posterior surgery, minimize the operation time, blood loss and the posterior ligament complex disruption. It can realize one-stage intervertebral fusion and instrumentation through a single small incision.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of Microendoscopy-Assisted Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Tomohide Segawa ◽  
Hisashi Koga ◽  
Masahito Oshina ◽  
Katsuhiko Ishibashi ◽  
Yuichi Takano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Background and objectives: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is a widely performed, minimally invasive technique to achieve lumbar lateral interbody fusion. However, some complications can arise due to constraints posed by the limited surgical space and visual field. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term postoperative clinical outcomes of microendoscopy-assisted OLIF (ME-OLIF) compared to conventional OLIF. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 75 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF or ME-OLIF. The age, sex, diagnosis, and number of fused levels were obtained from medical records. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative complications were also collected. Operation time and EBL were only measured per level required for the lateral procedure, excluding the posterior fixation surgery. The primary outcome measure was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The secondary outcome measure was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), measured preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Results: This case series consisted of 14 patients in the OLIF group and 61 patients in the ME-OLIF group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean operative time and EBL (p = 0.90 and p = 0.50, respectively). The perioperative complication rate was 21.4% in the OLIF group and 21.3% in the ME-OLIF group (p = 0.99). In both groups, the postoperative JOABPEQ, EQ-5D, and ODI scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in clinical results between the two surgical methods, the results suggest that both are safe surgical methods and that microendoscopy-assisted OLIF could serve as a potential alternative to the conventional OLIF procedure.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Indirect Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Stand-alone Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Liu ◽  
Quanlai Zhao ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Liang Xiao ◽  
Xin Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Indirect Decompression ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) has been gained more and more attention in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of indirect decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with stand-alone OLIF. Methods Sixty-three patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent stand-alone OLIF between July 2017 and May 2018 our department were included. Clinical outcomes including visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded. Radiographic outcomes comprising of disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH) and lumbar lordosis (LL) were measured. Intraoperative data and complications were collected. All the data were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. Results Eighty-two segments were fused in sixty-three patients using stand-alone OLIF. The average follow-up time was 21.9±3.5 months (range from 16 to 28 months). The DH increased from 0.9±0.3 cm preoperatively to 1.3±0.2 cm postoperatively, and the final follow-up was 1.1±0.2 cm (P < 0.01). The FH increased from 1.7±0.3 cm before surgery to 2.3±0.3 cm after surgery, but decreased to 2.1±0.3 cm at final follow-up (P < 0.01). The LL increased from 38.0°±15.6° before surgery to 42.7°±13.0° at the final follow-up (p<0.01). The VAS and ODI scores of all patients significantly improved at the final follow-up (p<0.01). The total complication rate was 30.2%. Only three patients received revision of posterior decompression and pedicle screw fixation. Conclusions Stand-alone OLIF is an effective option in selected patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

scholarly journals Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate VS. Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-dong Li ◽  
Li Zhong ◽  
Xiang-Qian Fang ◽  
Lei-Sheng Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive indirect decompression technique for the treatment of degenerative spinal disease. OLIF with posterior pedicle screws fixation frequently is performed, whereas it requires much more surgery time and blood loss. The purpose of this study was to compare the oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with lateral plate (LP) vs. OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw (PS) fixation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods The clinical data of 53 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent OLIF from January 2020 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed，24 in OLIF combined with lateral plate (OLIF+LP) group and 29 in OLIF combined with pedicle screw (OLIF+PS) group. All patients completed a minimum 1-year follow-up. The duration of operation, blood loss, fusion rate and complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH) and cross-sectional area (CSA) were also evaluated.Results The operation time was 75.41±11.53 min in the OLIF+LP group, which shorter than that in OLIF+PS group(127.05±5.62min, P<0.01). Also, the blood loss was significantly less in the OLIF+LP group (39.55±5.32 ml ) than in the OLIF+PS group (89.81±9.62, P<0.01). The VAS and ODI scores both significantly reduced after operation in OLIF+LP group. There was no difference either in VAS or ODI scores by 1 year after surgery between two groups (P>0.01). The DH, FH, and CSA parameters were all improved significantly after operation in both groups, however, there was no significant difference at the any follow-up point between the two groups. The total complication rate was 13.21% (7/53) in this study, and there was no siginificant difference between the two groups. The fusion rate was 91.67% in the OLIF+LP group and 93.10% in the OLIF+PS group (P =0.69).Conclusions OLIF+LP fixation seems to be a valuable surgical option for single-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, it can achieve much better clinical outcomes than OLIF+PS group.

scholarly journals Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) versus Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) at L5-S1: A Comparison of Two Approaches to the Lumbosacral Junction

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo Xi ◽  
Shane Burch ◽  
Chih-Chang Chang ◽  
Hui-bing Ruan ◽  
Charles M Eichler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Height Increase ◽  
Segmental Lordosis ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract INTRODUCTION The oblique lateral interbody fusion OLIF is an alternative anterior approach to the lumbar spine at L5-S1, and it is unknown how it compares to anterior lumbar interbody fusion ALIF. This abstract is to compare the radiographic and clinical factors of ALIF and OLIF at L5-S1 only. METHODS A retrospective review of patients who underwent ALIF or OLIF at L5-S1 only at the University of California San Francisco (2013-2018) was performed. Data collected were demographics, cage parameters, perioperative factors, and radiographic parameters. RESULTS A total of 58 patients were included (33 ALIF and 25 OLIF). The average surgical time was 211.94 min for ALIF and 154.86 min for OLIF (P < .001). The average blood loss was 214 ml for ALIF and 74 ml for OLIF (P < .001). The average day to solid food was 2.55 for ALIF and 0.8 for OLIF (P < .001). The average cage height was 14.78 mm for ALIF and 12.9 mm (P < .001) for OLIF. The average cage lordosis was 15.45° for ALIF and 12.68° (P = .76) for OLIF. Average anterior L5-S1 disc height increase was 8.52 mm (ALIF) and 5.02 mm (OLIF) (P = .018), and average posterior L5-S1 disc height increase was 3.34 mm (ALIF) and 1.30 mm (OLIF) (P = .034). The average L5-S1 segmental lordosis increase was 6.82° for ALIF and 7.63° for OLIF (P = .638). CONCLUSION Patients who underwent OLIF at L5-S1 had shorter ileus duration compared to ALIF and comparable operative times and blood loss. ALIF afforded larger cages to be placed, resulting in greater disc height, but there was no significant difference in L5-S1 segmental lordosis.

scholarly journals Clinical experience of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 205873922110399
Author(s):  
Jiaqi Li ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Chenghao Dou ◽  
Wei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Introduction Up to now, there were few studies on extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) surgery for lumbar spondylodiscitis. This study was aimed to evaluate clinical effectiveness and provide more information for XLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis. Methods We retrospectively collected cases of XLIF for the treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis from September 2017 to February 2020. There were 8 cases of non-specific infection of lumbar spine, 4 cases of lumbar tuberculosis, and 1 case of lumbar brucellosis. Basic information, antibiotic application, and inflammatory index were collected before and after surgery. Clinical effectiveness was evaluated at baseline and in 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery with visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). The comparison of the indicators before and after the operation was performed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Results The average intraoperative blood loss and operation time was 70mL and 99.23 min, respectively. The study consisted of 13 cases with single segment operation. The average follow-up time was 16.54 months. No sign of recurrence of spondylodiscitis occurred at last follow-up. Postoperative VAS and ODI were significantly decreased after the operation. No major blood vessels, nerves, or organ damage occurred during the perioperative period. Conclusion XLIF has shown good clinical effectiveness in the treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis with advantages of less bleeding and less tissue damage in the present study. More multi-center prospective comparative studies are needed to further verify the clinical effectiveness of this procedure in lumbar spondylodiscitis.

The Role of Hounsfield Unit in Intraoperative Endplate Violation and Delayed Cage Subsidence with Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110525
Author(s):  
Hao Wu ◽  
Jason Pui Yin Cheung ◽  
Teng Zhang ◽  
Zhi Shan ◽  
Xuyang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Hounsfield Unit ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cage Subsidence ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Study Design Retrospective clinical case series. Objectives To investigate the risk factors for intraoperative endplate violations and delayed cage subsidence after oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery. Secondly, to examine whether low Hounsfield unit (HU) values at different regions of the endplate are associated with intraoperative endplate violation or delayed cage subsidence. Methods 61 patients (aged 65.1 ± 9.5 years; 107 segments) who underwent OLIF with or without posterior instrumentation from May 2015 to April 2019 were retrospectively studied. Intraoperative endplate violation was measured on sagittal reconstructed computerized tomography (CT) images immediate postoperatively, while delayed cage subsidence was evaluated using lateral radiographs and defined at 1-month follow-up or later. Demographic information and clinical parameters such as age, body mass index, bone mineral density, number of surgical levels, cage dimension, disc height restoration, visual analogue scale (VAS), and HU at different regions of the endplate were obtained. Results Total postoperative cage subsidence was identified in 45 surgical levels (42.0%) in 26 patients (42.6%) up till postoperative 1-year follow-up. Low HU value at the ipsilateral epiphyseal ring was an independent risk factor for intraoperative endplate violation ( P = .008) with a cut-off value of 326.21 HUs. Low HU values at the central endplate had a significant correlation with delayed cage subsidence in stand-alone cases ( P = .013) with a cut-off value of 296.42 HUs. VAS scores were not different at 1 week postoperatively in cases with or without intraoperative endplate violation (3.12 ± .73 vs 2.89 ± .72, P = .166) and showed no difference at 1 year with or without delayed cage subsidence (1.95 ± .60 vs 2.26 ± .85, P = .173). Conclusions Intraoperative endplate violation and delayed cage subsidence are not uncommon with OLIF surgery. HUs of the endplate are good predictors for intraoperative endplate violation and cage subsidence since they can represent the regional bone quality of the endplate in contact with the implant. VAS improvements were not affected by intraoperative endplate violation or delayed cage subsidence at 1-year follow-up. Level of Evidence Level III.

scholarly journals Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Xing Du ◽  
Yuxiao She ◽  
Yunsheng Ou ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Objective. To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Methods. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent single-level DLS surgery in our department from 2015 to 2018 was performed. According to the surgical method, the enrolled patients were divided into two groups, namely, the OLIF group who underwent OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) and the TLIF group. Clinical outcomes included operation time, operation blood loss, postoperative drainage, hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and complications, and imaging outcomes included upper vertebral slip, intervertebral space height (ISH), intervertebral foramen height (IFH), intervertebral space angle (ISA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and bone fusion rate. All outcomes were recorded and analyzed. Results. A total of 65 patients were finally included, and there were 28 patients and 37 patients in the OLIF group and the TLIF group, respectively. The OLIF group showed shorter operation time, less blood loss, less postoperative drainage, and shorter hospital stay than the TLIF group ( P < 0.05 ). The ISH, IFH, ISA, and LL were all larger in the OLIF group at postoperative and last follow-up ( P < 0.05 ), but the degree of upper vertebral slip was found no difference between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). The bone graft fusion rate of OLIF group and TLIF group at 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up was 78.57%, 92.86%, and 100% and 70.27%, 86.49%, and 97.30%, respectively, and no significant differences were found ( P > 0.05 ). Compared with the TLIF group, the OLIF group showed a superior improvement in VAS and ODI at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperative ( P < 0.05 ), but no differences were found at 12 months postoperative and the last follow-up ( P > 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups, with 4 patients and 6 patients in the OLIF group and TLIF group, respectively ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusions. Compared with TLIF, OLIF showed the advantages of less surgical invasion, better decompression effect, and faster postoperative recovery in single-level DLS surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document