scholarly journals Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Plate VS. Combined with Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Degenerative Diseases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-dong Li ◽  
Li Zhong ◽  
Xiang-Qian Fang ◽  
Lei-Sheng Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive indirect decompression technique for the treatment of degenerative spinal disease. OLIF with posterior pedicle screws fixation frequently is performed, whereas it requires much more surgery time and blood loss. The purpose of this study was to compare the oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with lateral plate (LP) vs. OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw (PS) fixation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods The clinical data of 53 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases who underwent OLIF from January 2020 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed，24 in OLIF combined with lateral plate (OLIF+LP) group and 29 in OLIF combined with pedicle screw (OLIF+PS) group. All patients completed a minimum 1-year follow-up. The duration of operation, blood loss, fusion rate and complications were recorded. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH) and cross-sectional area (CSA) were also evaluated.Results The operation time was 75.41±11.53 min in the OLIF+LP group, which shorter than that in OLIF+PS group(127.05±5.62min, P<0.01). Also, the blood loss was significantly less in the OLIF+LP group (39.55±5.32 ml ) than in the OLIF+PS group (89.81±9.62, P<0.01). The VAS and ODI scores both significantly reduced after operation in OLIF+LP group. There was no difference either in VAS or ODI scores by 1 year after surgery between two groups (P>0.01). The DH, FH, and CSA parameters were all improved significantly after operation in both groups, however, there was no significant difference at the any follow-up point between the two groups. The total complication rate was 13.21% (7/53) in this study, and there was no siginificant difference between the two groups. The fusion rate was 91.67% in the OLIF+LP group and 93.10% in the OLIF+PS group (P =0.69).Conclusions OLIF+LP fixation seems to be a valuable surgical option for single-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, it can achieve much better clinical outcomes than OLIF+PS group.

scholarly journals Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: a Preliminary Clinical Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-dong Li ◽  
Shi-Tong Xing ◽  
Ji-Kang Min ◽  
Xiang-Qian Fang ◽  
Shun-Wu Fan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Lateral Plate ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Degenerative Diseases ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Background The oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive indirect decompression technique for the treatment of lumar spine disease. The OLIF has usually combined with supplemental posterior pedicle screw fixation for decreasing the perioperative complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with lateral plate instrumentation for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.Methods From May 2020 to August 2020, the clinical data of 20 patients who underwent OLIF combined with lateral plate instrumentation were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, blood loss, and the complications were recorded. Also, the radiological parameters, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated before and after surgery.Results The average operation time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 75.41±11.53 min, 39.57±9.22 ml, and 7.22±1.85 days, respectively. The VAS and ODI had both significantly improved after surgery (7.23±1.26 VS 2.15±0.87; 60.27±7.91 VS 21.80±6.32, P < 0.001). The postoperative disk height (DH) was 13.02±8.83 mm, which is much higher than before (P < 0.001); The postoperative foraminal height (FH) improved significantly (16.18±3.49 VS 21.54±2.12 mm, P < 0.01), and the cross-sectional area (CSA) had improved from 88.95±14.79 mm2 to 126.53±8.83 mm2 (P < 0.001). The radiological fusion rate was 95% at the last follow-up, while cage subsidence was found in one case. No major complications, such as ureteral injury, vascular injury and vertebral body fracture occurred.Conclusions OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation can avoid the lumbar posterior surgery, minimize the operation time, blood loss and the posterior ligament complex disruption. It can realize one-stage intervertebral fusion and instrumentation through a single small incision.

scholarly journals Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF) versus Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) at L5-S1: A Comparison of Two Approaches to the Lumbosacral Junction

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo Xi ◽  
Shane Burch ◽  
Chih-Chang Chang ◽  
Hui-bing Ruan ◽  
Charles M Eichler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Height Increase ◽  
Segmental Lordosis ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract INTRODUCTION The oblique lateral interbody fusion OLIF is an alternative anterior approach to the lumbar spine at L5-S1, and it is unknown how it compares to anterior lumbar interbody fusion ALIF. This abstract is to compare the radiographic and clinical factors of ALIF and OLIF at L5-S1 only. METHODS A retrospective review of patients who underwent ALIF or OLIF at L5-S1 only at the University of California San Francisco (2013-2018) was performed. Data collected were demographics, cage parameters, perioperative factors, and radiographic parameters. RESULTS A total of 58 patients were included (33 ALIF and 25 OLIF). The average surgical time was 211.94 min for ALIF and 154.86 min for OLIF (P < .001). The average blood loss was 214 ml for ALIF and 74 ml for OLIF (P < .001). The average day to solid food was 2.55 for ALIF and 0.8 for OLIF (P < .001). The average cage height was 14.78 mm for ALIF and 12.9 mm (P < .001) for OLIF. The average cage lordosis was 15.45° for ALIF and 12.68° (P = .76) for OLIF. Average anterior L5-S1 disc height increase was 8.52 mm (ALIF) and 5.02 mm (OLIF) (P = .018), and average posterior L5-S1 disc height increase was 3.34 mm (ALIF) and 1.30 mm (OLIF) (P = .034). The average L5-S1 segmental lordosis increase was 6.82° for ALIF and 7.63° for OLIF (P = .638). CONCLUSION Patients who underwent OLIF at L5-S1 had shorter ileus duration compared to ALIF and comparable operative times and blood loss. ALIF afforded larger cages to be placed, resulting in greater disc height, but there was no significant difference in L5-S1 segmental lordosis.

scholarly journals Curative Effect of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhui Zhang ◽  
Weiqiang Sun ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhang ◽  
Fengguang Yang ◽  
Yuping Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Curative Effect ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Antituberculous Drug ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Abstract Objective: This research aimed to investigate the curative effect of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis. Methods: A total of 32 patients, including 18 males and 14 females (29-58 years old, with the mean age of 47) who were admitted to our hospital from October 2016 to June 2020 and treated with oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with vertebral screw internal fixation, were retrospectively collected. The segmental distribution of lesions was L2- L316 cases, L3-L411 cases and L4-L55 cases. At first, preoperative antituberculous drug treatment was standardized for 2-4 weeks. Furthermore, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative complications, ESR, CRP, VAS, JOA and ASIA scores were recorded before and after surgery and at the last follow-up. In addition, antituberculous drug therapy was regulated continuously after surgery.Results: All patients were followed up for 12-17 months, with an average of 14 months. ① The average operation time was (132.5±21.4) min, and the intraoperative blood loss was (227.3±43.1) ml. ② Preoperative ESR was (74.56±15.43) mmol/h, and CRP was (43.21±19.37) mg/L. Seven days after surgery, ESR was (42.37±19.26) mmol/h, and CRP was (22.51±18.42) mg/L. In the last follow-up, ESR was (9.25±4.13) mmol/h, and CRP was (8.17±3.21) mg/L. They have statistically significant differences before surgery, seven days after the surgery and in the last follow-up (P<0.05). ③ The average VAS score before surgery was (7.21±1.40) points, the average JOA score was (18.24±4.13) points, the average VAS score seven days after surgery was (2.23±1.32) points, the average JOA score was (24.72±3.19) points, and the average VAS score in the last follow-up was (1.63±0.54) points. JOA score was (27.72±2.61). They have statistically significant differences before surgery, seven days after the surgery and in the last follow-up (P<0.05) ④Six patients had neurologic symptoms with ASIA grade D before surgery, 2 patients recovered to Grade E seven days after surgery, and the remaining 4 patients also recovered to grade E in the last follow-up. Besides, 26 patients were graded as Grade E before surgery, seven days after surgery and in the last follow-up. ⑤ After surgery, 1 patient suffered psoas major muscle damage, which was manifested as reduced hip flexion strength of the lower extremity, and returned to normal three weeks later. Apart from that, none of the patients had complications such as abdominal organ injury and poor wound healing. Conclusion: OLIF is a new minimally invasive method for treating lumbar tuberculosis, with short operation time, less blood loss, convenient operation, thorough removal of lesions, and good long-term follow-up effect. It is worthy of promotion and application.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822097914
Author(s):  
Lei Zhu ◽  
Jun-Wu Wang ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Xin-Min Feng
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lumbar Lordosis ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes, and perioperative complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of related studies reporting outcomes of OLIF for ASD. The clinical outcomes were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The radiographic parameters were evaluated by sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), Cobb angle and fusion rate. A random effects model and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed to investigate the results. Results: A total of 16 studies involving 519 patients were included in the present study. The mean difference of VAS-back score, VAS-leg score and ODI score before and after surgery was 5.1, 5.0 and 32.3 respectively. The mean correction of LL was 20.6°, with an average of 6.9° per level and the mean correction of Cobb was 16.4°, with an average of 4.7° per level. The mean correction of SVA, PT, SS, TK and PI-LL was 59.3 mm, 11.7°, 6.9°, 9.4° and 20.6° respectively. The mean fusion rate was 94.1%. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was 4.9% and 29.6% respectively. Conclusions: OLIF is an effective and safe surgery method in the treatment of mild or moderate ASD and it has advantages in less intraoperative blood loss and lower perioperative complications.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of Microendoscopy-Assisted Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Tomohide Segawa ◽  
Hisashi Koga ◽  
Masahito Oshina ◽  
Katsuhiko Ishibashi ◽  
Yuichi Takano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion ◽  
Lateral Interbody

Background and objectives: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) is a widely performed, minimally invasive technique to achieve lumbar lateral interbody fusion. However, some complications can arise due to constraints posed by the limited surgical space and visual field. The purpose of this study was to assess the short-term postoperative clinical outcomes of microendoscopy-assisted OLIF (ME-OLIF) compared to conventional OLIF. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively investigated 75 consecutive patients who underwent OLIF or ME-OLIF. The age, sex, diagnosis, and number of fused levels were obtained from medical records. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative complications were also collected. Operation time and EBL were only measured per level required for the lateral procedure, excluding the posterior fixation surgery. The primary outcome measure was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). The secondary outcome measure was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), measured preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Results: This case series consisted of 14 patients in the OLIF group and 61 patients in the ME-OLIF group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean operative time and EBL (p = 0.90 and p = 0.50, respectively). The perioperative complication rate was 21.4% in the OLIF group and 21.3% in the ME-OLIF group (p = 0.99). In both groups, the postoperative JOABPEQ, EQ-5D, and ODI scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in clinical results between the two surgical methods, the results suggest that both are safe surgical methods and that microendoscopy-assisted OLIF could serve as a potential alternative to the conventional OLIF procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document