A Clinical Analysis of 640 Inpatients With Pathologic Nipple Discharge

Author(s):  
Gang Wei ◽  
Rui Li ◽  
Gaosong Wu

Abstract Objective To discuss the value of early confirmation of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge based on double surgical indications under fiberoptic ductoscopy (FDS) followed by staining with methylene blue. Methods From October 2012 to October 2019, a total of 640 inpatients with pathologic nipple discharge from Wuhan University Zhongnan Hospital underwent fiberoptic ductoscopy, followed by injection of methylene blue into the lesional duct through the discharged hole that would be resected as a segment according to the range of the staining duct on the next day. Based on double surgical indications, different findings by fiberoptic ductoscopy were defined as surgical indications, both with space-occupying intraductal lesions scanned by FDS and without space-occupying intraductal lesions but with dark red bloody fluid or yellow serous fluid spillage at the opening of the terminal mammary duct or extensive erosive duct lesions. We retrospectively analyzed the relations between results from fiberoptic ductoscopy and pathologic diagnosis. Results Inpatients with pathological neoplasm accounted for 87.3%(452/518) of the 518 inpatients with space-occupying intraductal lesions scanned by FDS, but the 122 inpatients without space-occupying intraductal lesions only accounted for 28.7%(35/122) of the patients (P=0.00). However, patients pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer accounted for 11.8% (61/518) of the 518 inpatients with space-occupying lesions and 10.7%(13/122) of the 122 inpatients without space-occupying lesions (P=0.728). Conclusions According to the double standards of surgical indication with or without space-occupying intraductal lesions scanned by fiberoptic ductoscopy, the method of fiberoptic ductoscopy followed by staining of the mammary duct by methylene blue could not only avoid missed diagnosis of breast cancer caused by ductoscopy itself, but also reduce the rate of missed diagnosis on account of inoperative inaccurate resection range, which greatly improved the early diagnosis rate of breast cancer with nipple discharge as the only initial clinical manifestation.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12079-e12079
Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Yihe Yang

e12079 Background: Nipple discharge (ND) is a common complaint of women. There is no consensus on clinical approach in these patients. We investigated the diagnostic ability of combination of ultrasound (US) and mammogram (MG) in Chinese ND patients without palpable mass. Methods: 827 patients with ND as only chief complaint presented in the First Hospital of China Medical University (Shenyang, China) between 2008 and 2015 were included. Palpable mass, physiological NP and/or elevated PRL were excluded. All patients underwent dual-imaging examinations of US and MG. Indication of surgical excision included 1) BI-RADS categories 4b, 4c, 5 in either US or MG, and/or 2) US suspected papilloma. Patients met surgical indications served as study arm (N = 742). Patients did not meet surgical indications but underwent surgery served as control arm (N = 85). Reason of surgery in the control group were patients’ choices and surgeons’ clinical judgment. Histological diagnosis provided by surgery were analyzed. In our institution, breast cancer, papilloma, and/or papilloma with atypical dysplasia were regarded as histological indication of surgery. Chi-square tests were applied. Results: Histology revealed 88 (11.9%) breast cancer in the study arm and 0 breast cancer in the control arm ( p= 0.0008); 167 (22.5%) papilloma with atypical dysplasia in the study arm and 12 (13.6%) papilloma with atypical dysplasia in the control arm ( p= 0.08); 335 (45.1%) papilloma without atypical dysplasia in the study arm and 27 (30.7%) papilloma without atypical dysplasia in the control arm ( p= 0.02). A total of 590 (79.5%) in the study arm and 39 (44.3%) in the control arm met histological indication of surgical intervention ( p< 0.00001). Conclusions: This dual-imaging assessment of US and MG is sensitive in detecting breast cancer in ND without palpable mass patients. It showed diagnostic ability in detecting papilloma with/without atypical dysplasia, but needs further improvement.


2006 ◽  
Vol 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 530-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana D. Louie ◽  
Joseph P. Crowe ◽  
Andrea E. Dawson ◽  
Katherine B. Lee ◽  
Deborah L. Baynes ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1340-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-W. Shen ◽  
J. Wu ◽  
J.-S. Lu ◽  
Q.-X. Han ◽  
Z.-Z. Shen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-443
Author(s):  
Xiao-Qian Li ◽  
Feng Xu ◽  
Chu-Qi Lei ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Hong-Chuan Jiang

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Foulkes ◽  
G. Heard ◽  
T. Boyce ◽  
R. Skyrme ◽  
P. A. Holland ◽  
...  

Introduction. Spontaneous nipple discharge is the third most common reason for presentation to a symptomatic breast clinic. Benign and malignant causes of spontaneous nipple discharge continue to be difficult to distinguish. We analyse our experience of duct excisions for spontaneous nipple discharge to try to identify features that raise suspicion of breast cancer and to identify features indicative of benign disease that would be suitable for nonoperative management.Methods. Details of one hundred and ninety-four patients who underwent duct excision for spontaneous nipple discharge between 1995 and 2005 were analysed.Results. Malignant disease was identified in 11 (5.7%) patients, 4 invasive and 7 insitu, which was 10.2% of those presenting with bloodstained discharge. All patients with malignant disease had bloodstained discharge. Discharge due to malignant disease was more likely to be bloodstained than that due to benign causes (Fisher's exact test, 2-tailedPvalue = 0.00134).Conclusion. Our findings do not support a policy of conservative management of spontaneous bloodstained nipple discharge. Cases of demonstrable spontaneous bloodstained nipple discharge should undergo duct excision to prevent malignant lesions being missed.


2002 ◽  
Vol 184 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter D Blessing ◽  
Alan J Stolier ◽  
Stephen C Teng ◽  
John S Bolton ◽  
George M Fuhrman

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 020501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khushi Vyas ◽  
Michael Hughes ◽  
Daniel Richard Leff ◽  
Guang-Zhong Yang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document