scholarly journals Effect of Bispectral Index-Guided Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Post-Anesthetic Recovery Outcomes in High-Risk Children: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoliang Liu ◽  
Lijing Li ◽  
Xuemei Zhang ◽  
Xiaoxue Wang ◽  
Lei Hua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Bispectral Index ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Total Intravenous Anesthesia ◽  
Depth Of Anesthesia ◽  
Intravenous Anesthesia ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B

Abstract BACKGROUND TIVA is widely used in children, but few studies have attempted to evaluation of the effect of BIS-guided propofol infusion than that on conventional methods on recovery outcomes in children with higher risk factors.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effect of bispectral index (BIS) guidance during total intravenous anesthesia on post-anesthetic recovery outcomes in children at higher risk during anesthesia. DESIGNA prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING University medical centre.PATIENTSThis study enrolled 472 children (aged 1-14 years) who met the higher-risk scoring criteria and were scheduled for surgery under total intravenous anesthesia. INTERVENTIONThe children were randomly assigned to the BIS group (group B) and standard clinical practice group (group S). The BIS values in group B were maintained at 45–60. The anesthesiologist controlled the depth of anesthesia in group S according to the variation in the clinical signs of the children. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESBIS values, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and pulse oxygen saturation at each time points, as well as the time between drug withdrawal to extubation, duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), the total amount of propofol used, and postoperative adverse reactions were recorded. RESULTSThere was no significant difference in time from stopping propofol infusion to extubation and duration of PACU between the groups . There was no significant difference in BIS values between the groups at T2, T3, and T8. BIS values at T1, T4, T5, T6, and T7 in group B were lower than those in group S. There was no statistically significant difference in the HR between the groups. MAP in group B was lower than in group S at T5, T6, T7, and T8. The total amount of propofol administered in group B was higher than in group S. CONCLUSIONThe use of BIS-guided total intravenous anesthesia in higher-risk children can maintain the proper depth of anesthesia but does not prolong the time of extubation and the duration of stay in the PACU.TRIAL REGISTRATION Chictr.org.cn identifier: 24/11/2017 , ChiCTR-IOR-17013530

scholarly journals Open release versus radiofrequency microtenotomy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharine Hamlin ◽  
Christopher Munro ◽  
Scott L. Barker ◽  
Sean McKenna ◽  
Kapil Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lateral Epicondylitis ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Significant Difference

Background Optimal surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis remains uncertain. Recently, radiofrequency microtenotomy (RFMT) has been proposed as a suitable treatment. We compared RFMT with standard open release (OR) in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Methods In total, 41 patients with symptoms for at least 6 months were randomized into two groups: 23 patients had RFMT and 18 had OR. Two patients from RFMT withdrew. Each patient underwent Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, grip strength and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores pre-operatively and at 6 weeks. Pain and DASH scores were repeated at 6 months and 12 months. Results NRS pain scores improved by 4.8 points for RFMT and by 3.9 points for OR. There was a significant improvement in both groups from pre-operative scores, although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups at 1 year. Grip strength improved by 31% in the RFMT group compared to 38% in OR. There was no significant difference between the initial and 6 weeks scores or between treatments. At 1 year, DASH was 39.8 points for RFMT and 24.4 points for OR. There was a significant improvement in both groups from pre-operative scores, although there was no statistically significant difference between the groups at 1 year. Conclusions Both groups showed significant improvements and similar benefit to the patient. The results of the present study do not show any benefit of RFMT over the standard OR. As a result of the extra expense of RFMT, we therefore recommend that OR is offered as the standard surgical management.

scholarly journals One day versus three days’ antibiotic prophylaxis in joint arthroplasty. A prospective randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Elsaqa ◽  
Mahmoud A. Karim ◽  
Walid Ebeid ◽  
Mohamed Youness
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: The objectives of the study was to compare the effectiveness of 1 day versus 3 days post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing surgical site infection (SSI) rate after arthroplasty surgery. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted over 1 year, in Cairo University Hospitals. The study included adult patients, who were scheduled for arthroplasty. Sixty patients were divided into two groups, 30 patients in each. The first group of patients received cefazolin for 1 day postoperatively (1-day group) and the other group for 3 days postoperatively (3-days group). Patients were randomized using the sealed opaque envelope method. Results: There were 32 females and 28 males. The mean patient age was 52 years (range 20–85 years). Wound infection developed in four cases (one case from the 1-day group and three cases from the 3-days group). All infections occurred within the early post-operative period, and completely resolved after proper management. Correlating the SSI to the type of surgery, operative time, the associated medical co-morbidities, and the duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This study suggests that there is no significant difference in the prevalence of SSI between 1 day and 3 days of antimicrobial prophylaxis after primary joint arthroplasty within the average post-operative follow-up period of 3 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document