BT33 Training Effectiveness Analysis

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Finley ◽  
H. C. Strasel
1985 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert L. Neal ◽  
Thomas L. Paris

The US Army Training and Doctrine Command's (TRADOC) Training Effectiveness Analysis (TEA) System studies assume that measured soldier job performance is a function of the interaction of five factors: the soldier, the trainer, the training subsystem, the hardware subsystem, and the training environment. Examples of how this assumption guides TEA studies and contributes to the analysis of Army training effectiveness are provided.


1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert L. Neal

U S Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) training effectiveness analysis (TEA) began in 1975 and has evolved into today's TRADOC TEA System, An overview of the TEA System history, characteristics, methodology, scope, and lessons-learned are presented in this paper.


1982 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Maitland

A Training Effectiveness Analysis (TEA) was performed during the preparation for the final operational testing of the M1 (ABRAMS) Main Battle Tank. The results of the analysis of the training program for tank operators are discussed to illustrate the usefulness of TEA in the developmental process of Army training programs.


1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin B. Rosen ◽  
Doris C. Berger ◽  
Richard K. Matlick

1977 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert L. Neal ◽  
Dale M. Dannhaus ◽  
Thomas J. Tierney ◽  
John A. Cartner

In the future the Human Factors specialist can expect to plan and conduct economic analysis-oriented training studies called cost and training effectiveness analyses (CTEA). This paper enumerates basic CTEA principles and describes a basic rifle marksmanship training study to illustrate their application.


Author(s):  
EMRAH KAZAN ◽  
MUMTAZ USMEN ◽  
BEDEL DESRUISSEAUX ◽  
SERHAN KAYA ◽  
MUSSIE SEYOUM

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document