DURIP99 Individual Differences in Visual Cognition

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Kosslyn
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Visual Cognition

Verbal and visual cognition: Individual differences in the lab, in the brain, and in the classroom

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 507-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine L. Alfred ◽  
David J. M. Kraemer
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Visual Cognition ◽  
The Brain

scholarly journals The Malleability of Attentional Capture

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Zhang ◽  
Tessa Abagis ◽  
John Jonides
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Attentional Capture ◽  
Visual Cognition ◽  
Color Singleton ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Previous Trial ◽  
Attentional State ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
And Training

We suggest that consideration of trial-by-trial variations, individual differences, and training data will enrich the current framework in Luck et al. (2020). We consider whether attentional capture is modulated by trial-by-trial fluctuations of attentional state and experiences on the previous trial. We also consider whether individual differences may affect attentional capture while highlighting potential challenges in using the color-singleton task to measure individual differences. Finally, performance in the color-singleton task can be modified dramatically with practice but the underlying mechanisms are not entirely clear. Understanding the malleability of attentional capture may broaden the current framework and resolve outstanding questions. The version of record of this manuscript will be available in Visual Cognition (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2021.1915903

The challenge of accounting for individual differences in folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Ruisch ◽  
Rajen A. Anderson ◽  
David A. Pizarro
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Individual Variation ◽  
Political Ideologies ◽  
Economic Beliefs ◽  
Existing Data

AbstractWe argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.

Individual differences, social attention, and the history of the social motivation hypotheses of autism

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Mundy
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Early Development ◽  
Emotional Development ◽  
Social Motivation ◽  
Social Attention ◽  
Social Emotional Development ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Precise Understanding ◽  
The Social ◽  
History Of

Abstract The stereotype of people with autism as unresponsive or uninterested in other people was prominent in the 1980s. However, this view of autism has steadily given way to recognition of important individual differences in the social-emotional development of affected people and a more precise understanding of the possible role social motivation has in their early development.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document