Learning Regular Languages from Positive Evidence

Author(s):  
Laura Firoiu ◽  
Tim Oates ◽  
Paul R. Cohen
1970 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Agassi

1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
A J Dos Reis
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yi Wang ◽  
Li Wei

Abstract The current study explores how multilingual speakers with three typologically different languages (satellite-framed, verb-framed and equipollent-framed) encode and gauge event similarity in the domain of caused motion. Specifically, it addresses whether, and to what extent, the acquisition of an L2-English and an L3-Japanese reconstructs the lexicalization and conceptualization patterns established in the L1-Cantonese when the target language is actively involved in the decision-making process. Results show that multilingual speakers demonstrated an ongoing process of cognitive restructuring towards the target language (L3) in both linguistic encoding (event structures and semantic representations) and non-linguistic conceptualization (reaction time). And the degree of the restructuring is modulated by the amount of language contact with the L2 and L3. The study suggests that learning a language means internalizing a new way of thinking and provides positive evidence for L3-biased cognitive restructuring within the framework of thinking-for-speaking.


1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 52-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Yu ◽  
Qingyu Zhuang

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-149
Author(s):  
J. Albert ◽  
H.A. Maurer ◽  
Th. Ottmann

We present necessary and sufficient conditions for an OL form F to generate regular languages only. The conditions at issue can be effectively checked, whence the “regularity problem for OL forms” is proven decidable.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-192
Author(s):  
NathanaËl Fijalkow

Abstract This paper studies the complexity of languages of finite words using automata theory. To go beyond the class of regular languages, we consider infinite automata and the notion of state complexity defined by Karp. Motivated by the seminal paper of Rabin from 1963 introducing probabilistic automata, we study the (deterministic) state complexity of probabilistic languages and prove that probabilistic languages can have arbitrarily high deterministic state complexity. We then look at alternating automata as introduced by Chandra, Kozen and Stockmeyer: such machines run independent computations on the word and gather their answers through boolean combinations. We devise a lower bound technique relying on boundedly generated lattices of languages, and give two applications of this technique. The first is a hierarchy theorem, stating that there are languages of arbitrarily high polynomial alternating state complexity, and the second is a linear lower bound on the alternating state complexity of the prime numbers written in binary. This second result strengthens a result of Hartmanis and Shank from 1968, which implies an exponentially worse lower bound for the same model.


2006 ◽  
Vol 157 (11) ◽  
pp. 1532-1549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner Kuich ◽  
George Rahonis

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 1287-1294
Author(s):  
Péter L. Erdös ◽  
Claude Tardif ◽  
Gábor Tardos
Keyword(s):  

PMLA ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Levin

The method used by some recent critics to prove that certain Shakespearean characters are “figures” of Christ (or of other biblical or Renaissance personages) was parodied by Shakespeare himself in Fluellen's comparison of Henry v to Alexander the Great. Its success is guaranteed in advance, since it allows the critic to select only the similarities between the two persons being compared without considering whether these are unique or whether they are more significant than the differences between them. The evidence is thus subjected to a double screening: the critic determines which events in the character's career can be compared to the historical personage, and then which aspects of those events are relevant to the comparison. Even the differences between them can be converted into positive evidence. It is therefore possible by this method to prove that almost any character is a figure of Christ or of King James or of almost anyone else, which is the great strength of “Fluellenism” and also its great weakness, since a method that can prove anything proves nothing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document