Keynote Address: Dr. Kalpana Gopalan - International Conference on Strategic Management: Emerging Economies Perspective. Oxford College of Business: Management

Author(s):  
Kalpana Gopalan
Author(s):  
Nayan Mitra

AbstractCorporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is like a chameleon, that changes its colour according to the context it is in. In the developed economy, it takes the form of sustainability and/ or philanthropy, whereas, in emerging economies, it speaks the language of religious, political and/ or mandated CSR. India, in recent times came into the limelight with its mandated CSR policy that was incorporated into its Companies Act 2013, which became operational from the financial year 2014 - 2015. Mandated CSR is thus a new area of study that is based on the philosophy that ‘CSR should contribute to the national agenda in emerging economies,’ under some statutory guidelines as laid down by the Government.But, business houses, do look for maximising its profit. Profit can be financial and/ or non-financial. If not money, then at least the effort must be compensated with reputation, image, that helps in brand building! And, to have this as an objective, their efforts should be strategic! But, does all strategies work? With these questions and conceptual thinking, this empirical research aims to identify the key aspects of Strategic Management, CSR and Firm Performance and establish relationship between them; apart from developing a valid and reliable scale to do so. This is indeed one of the first researches and documentations done among the large Indian firms in India immediately in the post mandate period and thus forms a base for understanding the CSR dynamics in the years to come.


2007 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
James Burke

The Long View - James Burke gave the keynote address at the Thermo Informatics World international conference in Prague, which explored how users can take advantage of evolving technologies to drive improvement in laboratories and business, from which this article is adapted.


2002 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-86
Author(s):  
Jonathan Doh ◽  
Hildy Teegen

We investigate factors that contribute to governmental decisions to fully versus partially privatize state-owned infrastructure services. Drawing from financial economics and strategic management, we develop a model of the decision to partly or fully privatize a given state-owned asset. Using a proprietary database of telecommunications projects in emerging economies, we find that governments are more likely to fully privatize in countries with higher per capita income and lower existing telecommunications infrastructure penetration, and in countries that have made substantial international investment commitments. We also find full privatizations more prevalent in projects associated with local (versus national or international) phone service. The overall findings support a strategic choice perspective of governments??use of privatization as a vehicle to accelerate economic development in technology-intensive industries.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-130 ◽  

For a third time, Archaeological dialogues has organized a face-to-face dialogue at an international conference around a current and provocative question. At the annual meeting for the Society of American Archaeologists in Atlanta, USA, in April 2009, Archaeological dialogues invited a panel of leading scholars to participate in a discussion forum entitled ‘Is archaeology useful?’. The discussion sought to address a number of interrelated questions: how important is the criterion of ‘usefulness’ in establishing the value of our discipline? To whom do we need to justify ourselves? In what ways can or should archaeology be useful to society? Must archaeologists distinguish between critique and action, and balance knowledge production and public consumption of our work? Does it really matter what we do and for whom? Shannon Dawdy presented her thoughts in a keynote address which was followed by comments from Carol McDavid, Peggy Nelson, Mark Pluciennik, Jeremy Sabloff, Joe Watkins and Rita Wright. The keynote address, along with the comments that arose from the forum, are published in this issue as a discussion article. The written version of this dialogue also includes comments by Pedro Funari with Aline Vieira de Carvalho, Cornelius Holtorf and Ulrike Sommer, who were invited to share their views on the topic and broaden the scope of the debate.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramya Tarakad Venkateswaran ◽  
Abhoy K. Ojha

Purpose Universalizing approaches to knowledge when combined with a dominating cultural discourse is problematic for management research paradigms as “West meets East”. This study aims to examine the case of the rapidly expanding, mainstream strategic management research in and on emerging economies through a critical perspective. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze the strategic management society’s special conferences and workshops on “Emerging India” that aimed to write a fresh chapter of research on India as an emerging economy, using the methodology of critical discourse analysis (CDA). The authors treat this conference as representative of several such conferences and workshops being organized in emerging economies. Findings The results detect some troubling undercurrents of privilege and marginalization. The authors find support for a dominating cultural discourse embedded in the rapidly expanding, universalizing strategic management research perspectives in and on emerging economies. Research limitations/implications The implications for indigenous knowledge creation is discussed with a concluding call for academic reflexivity through revisiting different philosophies of science in management research and studying the social mechanisms of international knowledge exchange. Originality/value The theoretical framework combining the process of universalizing knowledge (Bourdieu and Wacquant, 1999) with a dominating cultural discourse sustained through a system of pressures and constraints (Said, 1978, 1993) is an original contribution. The choice of an emerging economy site is not very common, and the use of CDA on an event like a conference is valuable to research methodology.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Raiser

The following essay was the keynote delivered at the International Conference of the German Law & Society Association in Bremen, Germany, in March 2010. In seeking to understand the formation of the Association of the Sociology of Law it is important to be mindful of the context of the spirit of the 1960s and 1970s in which it arose. Sociology of law's beginnings can be traced to the start of the 20th century with especially Eugen Ehrlich, Max Weber, Hermann Kantorowicz, Arthur Nußbaum and Theodor Geiger. However, after nearly being wiped out under German National Socialism, it began to re-emerge slightly in the 1960s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document