Informal Institutions, Collective Action, and Public Investment in Rural China

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiqing Xu ◽  
Yang Yao
2015 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
YIQING XU ◽  
YANG YAO

Do informal institutions, rules, and norms created and enforced by social groups promote good local governance in environments of weak democratic or bureaucratic institutions? This question is difficult to answer because of challenges in defining and measuring informal institutions and identifying their causal effects. In the article, we investigate the effect of lineage groups, one of the most important vehicles of informal institutions in rural China, on local public goods expenditure. Using a panel dataset of 220 Chinese villages from 1986 to 2005, we find that village leaders from the two largest family clans in a village increased local public investment considerably. This association is stronger when the clans appeared to be more cohesive. We also find that clans helped local leaders overcome the collective action problem of financing public goods, but there is little evidence suggesting that they held local leaders accountable.


2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (04) ◽  
pp. 899-916
Author(s):  
JIANGLI DOU ◽  
BING YE

In this paper, we empirically investigate the impact of informal institutions on local public investment in rural China. We find that lineage groups have a significant effect on local public investment (per capita investment in irrigation, schools, roads, etc.): One clan is good for local public goods investment, while two or more clans in a village have a negative effect. The effect is increasing with the coverage of the largest clan. The evidence on religious groups is mixed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 79-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahua Wang ◽  
Chunliang Chen ◽  
Eduardo Araral

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document