Dynamically Estimating the Distributional Impacts of U.S. Climate Policy with NEMS: A Case Study of the Climate Protection Act of 2013

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Cullenward ◽  
Jordan T. Wilkerson ◽  
Michael W. Wara ◽  
John Weyant
2016 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 303-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Cullenward ◽  
Jordan T. Wilkerson ◽  
Michael Wara ◽  
John P. Weyant

Energy Policy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (18) ◽  
pp. 1993-1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odile Blanchard ◽  
James F. Perkaus

Author(s):  
Anil Markandya ◽  
Dirk T.G. Rübbelke

SummaryThe benefits of climate policy normally consist exclusively of the reduced impacts of climate change, i.e., the policy’s primary aim. Our analysis of benefits of climate policy suggests, however, that researchers and policymakers should also take account of ancillary benefits, e.g., in the shape of improved air quality induced by climate protection measures. A consideration of both, primary and ancillary benefits, has a positive influence on global climate protection efforts, e.g., because the regional impact of ancillary effects attenuates easy-riding motives of countries with respect to their provision of climate protection. In this article, we analyze the nature of ancillary benefits, present an overview of European assessment studies and explain possible methods to estimate ancillary benefits. Main differences between primary and ancillary benefits are pointed out. Furthermore, we stress the major influences of ancillary benefits on climate policy. Finally, we present one of the first models integrating primary and ancillary benefits. By this model quantitative results are calculated with respect to ancillary benefits in the UK considering different greenhouse gas (GHG) control levels. It is observed that the ancillary benefits could cover about 4 percent of the full GHG reduction cost.


2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Achim Brunnengräber

AbstractIn this essay the European energy and climate protection policy and its effects on developing countries are to be discussed. Are their nutrition problems being detereorated or do additional exports establish opportunities for a sustainable development? I argue that coherence of energy security and climate protection policy, as aimed by the European Commission, cannot be achieved by the measures taken so far. First of all the paper discusses the primacy of competition policy while, in the second place, strategic selectivity of climate instruments will be dealt with. Thridly, the „faith in technology“ will be approached and the fourth issue is dedicated to agrofuels and the commodification of developing countries’ ressources. As a result the EU energy and climate policy is about to aggravate nutrition problems. What is needed is a Transformation to a sustainable economy to realigning the north-south divide on the one and to overcome inconsistencies between ener gy security and climate policy on the other hand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document