Do Contractionary Monetary Policy Shocks Expand Shadow Banking?

Author(s):  
Benjamin Nelson ◽  
Gabor Pinter ◽  
Konstantinos Theodoridis
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arina Wischnewsky ◽  
Matthias Neuenkirch

AbstractWe provide evidence for a risk-taking channel of monetary policy transmission in the euro area that works through an increase in shadow banks’ total asset growth and their risk assets ratio. Our dataset covers the period 2000Q1–2018Q3 and includes, in addition to the standard variables for real GDP growth, inflation, and the monetary policy stance, the aforementioned two indicators for the shadow banking sector. Based on vector autoregressive models for the euro area as a whole, we find a portfolio reallocation effect towards riskier assets and evidence for a general expansion of assets. Both effects last for roughly six quarters in the case of conventional monetary policy shocks, whereas for unconventional monetary policy shocks the responses are significant for two quarters only. Country-specific as well as sector-specific estimations confirm these findings for most of the euro area countries and all non-bank types, but also reveal some heterogeneity in the reaction of financial institutions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Nelson ◽  
Gabor Pinter ◽  
Konstantinos Theodoridis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Toyoichiro Shirota

Abstract This study empirically examines whether shock size matters for the US monetary policy effects. Using a nonlinear local projection method, I find that large monetary policy shocks are less powerful than smaller monetary policy shocks, with the information effect being the potential source of the observed asymmetry in monetary policy efficacy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document