Justicia civil a debate: qué, por qué y cómo (Pasado, presente y retos de futuro del proceso civil)” (Debate On Civil Justice: What, Why and How (Past, Present and Challenges for the Future of Civil Procedure))

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Barona Vilar
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals Gascón Inchausti, F., Hess, B. (eds.), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure. Cordination or Harmonisation?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 1505
Author(s):  
Guillermo Schumann Barragán
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
European Law ◽  
The Future

Este artículo reseña: Gascón Inchausti, F., Hess, B. (eds.), The Future of the European Law of Civil Procedure. Cordination or Harmonisation?, Intersentia, Cambridge, 2020, 290 pp.

Compliance Problems and Digitizing Case Management in England and Wales

2020 ◽  
pp. 153-178
Author(s):  
John Sorabji
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Case Management ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
Reform Programme ◽  
Effective Operation ◽  
Compliance Problem ◽  
Civil Justice System ◽  
Civil Courts ◽  
Potential Use

Compliance with case management orders has been a hidden problem undermining the effective operation of the Civil Procedure Rules. The focus of academic critique has, however, been on the adverse consequences to their effective operation of non-compliance with such orders. This chapter considers this unexamined problem of case management: the compliance problem. It first examines the nature of the compliance problem, placing it within the context of the wider and substantially explored problem of non-compliance; the latter having formed a major limb of Zuckerman’s critique of English civil procedure. It then explores how current and potential future reforms to the English civil justice system arising from HMCTS reform programme, the Civil Courts Structure review, digitization and the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) could overcome this unexplored problem.

The Future of the Traditional Civil Procedure

2012 ◽  
pp. 67-87
Author(s):  
Petrônio Calmon
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals The new Civil Procedure Rules. 1. The process of dispute resolution and litigation

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Rix
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Expert Witness ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Previous Article ◽  
Civil Justice ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Civil Justice System

In the second of my previous two articles on the role of the expert witness, I anticipated the implementation of Lord Woolf's proposed reforms to the civil justice system in England and Wales (Rix, 1999). These changes came into effect on 26 April 1999 and they represent the most radical changes to the civil justice system for a hundred years. In the previous article, it was not possible to do more than list a few of the key points relevant to experts. The purpose of this article is to describe the changes in detail and show how they will, or can be expected to, affect the role of the expert.

scholarly journals “Gateways” within the Civil Procedure Rules and the future of service-out jurisdiction in England

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 516-540
Author(s):  
Ardavan Arzandeh
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Future

scholarly journals Hryniak v. Mauldin Comes to Alberta: Summary Judgment, Culture Shift, and the Future of Civil Trials

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Billingsley
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Past ◽  
Culture Shift ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Future ◽  
Civil Trials ◽  
Summary Judgment

Alberta’s law of civil procedure, and summary judgment in particular, has experienced a culture shift since the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Hryniak v. Mauldin. This article asks whether litigation directed toward a conventional trial is now, or is soon to be, a thing of the past. Although intended to revive traditional trials as a realistic and timely resolution option, it is impossible to say yet if this will be Hryniak’s legacy in Alberta. Three things are clear in post-Hryniak Albertan jurisprudence, however: first, the Hryniak test governs the determination of summary judgment applications in Alberta; second, Alberta courts have embraced the call for proportionality in litigation procedure; and third, the Hryniak culture shift creates uncertainty for Alberta litigants.

scholarly journals Os alimentos provisionais como efetivação do direito aos alimentos e o sistema de tutelas cognitivas de urgência do Novo Código de Processo Civil (Lei nº 13.105/2015) / The brazilian provisional alimonies as realization of the right to alimony and the summary judgment system of the New Civil Procedure Code (Law 13.105/ 2015)

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cristina Alves de Paula ◽  
Edilberto Marassi Basílio Silveira Junior ◽  
Gabrielle Ota Longo ◽  
Yvete Flávio Da Costa
Keyword(s):  
Child Support ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judgment Type ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Summary Judgment ◽  
Legal Mechanism ◽  
Present Text

Resumo: Este artigo contém uma análise dos alimentos provisionais como mecanismo jurídico-processual eficaz de tutela do direito aos alimentos, no bojo da sistemática processual civil hodierna, não se olvidando de enfrentar as questões advindas da nova disciplina jurídica das medidas de urgência, inaugurada pela Lei nº 13.105/2015 (Novo Código de Processo Civil). Para tanto, o presente texto, em estudo crítico-doutrinário, perscruta, pormenorizadamente a disciplina jurídica atinente aos alimentos provisionais enquanto modalidade de tutela antecipatória, diferenciando-os dos alimentos provisórios. Disserta acerca das desconcertantes indagações oriundas da desregulamentação das tutelas cognitivas de urgência nominadas promovida pela nova codificação, problematizando suas repercussões sobre o instituto dos alimentos provisionais. Propõe, para cada uma delas, sem desprezar a relevância futura dos contributos doutrinários e jurisprudenciais, possíveis soluções, que prezem pela minimização das dificuldades a serem criadas.Abstract: This article analyses the Brazilian provisional alimony/alimony pendente lite as a procedural realization and a legal mechanism of protection for the rights of alimony, palimony, parental and child support in the wake of contemporary Brazilian civil procedural system, not forgetting to address the issues arising from the new summary judgment legal regulation, inaugurated by Law 13,105/2015 (New Civil Procedure Code). For this purpose, the present text, a critically-doctrinal study, scrutinize in detail the legal regulation pertaining to provisional alimonies while Brazilian anticipatory summary judgment type, distinguishing them from Brazilian provisory alimony. It discusses about the perplexing questions arising from the deregulation of nominated summary judgment system, promoted by the new coding, questioning its impact on the institute of provisional alimonies. It proposes, for each of these questions, without neglecting the future relevance of the doctrinal and jurisprudential contributions, possible solutions, which seek minimizing the difficulties to be created. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document