The Art of Natural Language Processing: Classical, Modern and Contemporary Approaches to Text Document Classification

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ferrario ◽  
Mara Naegelin
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
TẠ DUY CÔNG CHIẾN

Ontologies apply to many applications in recent years, such as information retrieval, information extraction, and text document classification. The purpose of domain-specific ontology is to enrich the identification of concept and the interrelationships. In our research, we use ontology to specify a set of generic subjects (concept) that characterizes the domain as well as their definitions and interrelationships. This paper introduces a system for labeling subjects of a text documents based on the differential layers of domain specific ontology, which contains the information and the vocabularies related to the computer domain. A document can contain several subjects such as data science, database, and machine learning. The subjects in text document classification are determined based on the differential layers of the domain specific ontology. We combine the methodologies of Natural Language Processing with domain ontology to determine the subjects in text document. In order to increase performance, we use graph database to store and access ontology. Besides, the paper focuses on evaluating our proposed algorithm with some other methods. Experimental results show that our proposed algorithm yields performance significantly


Author(s):  
Kyunghyun Cho

Deep learning has rapidly gained huge popularity among researchers in natural-language processing and computational linguistics in recent years. This chapter gives a comprehensive and detailed overview of recent deep-learning-based approaches to challenging problems in natural-language processing, specifically focusing on document classification, language modelling, and machine translation. At the end of the chapter, new opportunities in natural-language processing made possible by deep learning are discussed, which are multilingual and larger-context modelling.


2020 ◽  
pp. 3-17
Author(s):  
Peter Nabende

Natural Language Processing for under-resourced languages is now a mainstream research area. However, there are limited studies on Natural Language Processing applications for many indigenous East African languages. As a contribution to covering the current gap of knowledge, this paper focuses on evaluating the application of well-established machine translation methods for one heavily under-resourced indigenous East African language called Lumasaaba. Specifically, we review the most common machine translation methods in the context of Lumasaaba including both rule-based and data-driven methods. Then we apply a state of the art data-driven machine translation method to learn models for automating translation between Lumasaaba and English using a very limited data set of parallel sentences. Automatic evaluation results show that a transformer-based Neural Machine Translation model architecture leads to consistently better BLEU scores than the recurrent neural network-based models. Moreover, the automatically generated translations can be comprehended to a reasonable extent and are usually associated with the source language input.


Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1243-P
Author(s):  
JIANMIN WU ◽  
FRITHA J. MORRISON ◽  
ZHENXIANG ZHAO ◽  
XUANYAO HE ◽  
MARIA SHUBINA ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pamela Rogalski ◽  
Eric Mikulin ◽  
Deborah Tihanyi

In 2018, we overheard many CEEA-AGEC members stating that they have "found their people"; this led us to wonder what makes this evolving community unique. Using cultural historical activity theory to view the proceedings of CEEA-ACEG 2004-2018 in comparison with the geographically and intellectually adjacent ASEE, we used both machine-driven (Natural Language Processing, NLP) and human-driven (literature review of the proceedings) methods. Here, we hoped to build on surveys—most recently by Nelson and Brennan (2018)—to understand, beyond what members say about themselves, what makes the CEEA-AGEC community distinct, where it has come from, and where it is going. Engaging in the two methods of data collection quickly diverted our focus from an analysis of the data themselves to the characteristics of the data in terms of cultural historical activity theory. Our preliminary findings point to some unique characteristics of machine- and human-driven results, with the former, as might be expected, focusing on the micro-level (words and language patterns) and the latter on the macro-level (ideas and concepts). NLP generated data within the realms of "community" and "division of labour" while the review of proceedings centred on "subject" and "object"; both found "instruments," although NLP with greater granularity. With this new understanding of the relative strengths of each method, we have a revised framework for addressing our original question.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document