The Effect of Liquidity Regulation on U.S. Bank Risk-Taking: Evidence from Reserve Requirements and the Liquidity Coverage Ratio

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Bosshardt ◽  
Ali Kakhbod
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Reserve Requirements ◽  
Coverage Ratio ◽  
Liquidity Regulation

Factors Affecting Bank Risk-Taking: Evidence from Southeast Asian Countries

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-136
Author(s):  
NGUYEN THANH LIEM ◽  
TRAN HUNG SON ◽  
HOANG TRUNG NGHIA
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Southeast Asian ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Asian Countries ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Southeast Asian Countries

Asset Securitization and Bank Risk Taking

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lai Van Vo ◽  
Huong Thi Thu Le
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Asset Securitization

Bank Risk-Taking and the Lender of Last Resort

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Mink
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Lender Of Last Resort

Does a Larger Menu Increase Appetite? Collateral Eligibility and Bank Risk-Taking

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sjoerd van Bekkum ◽  
Marc Gabarro ◽  
Rustom M. Irani
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Bank Risk

Internal Control Quality and Bank Risk-Taking and Performance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Baugh ◽  
Matthew Ege ◽  
Christopher G. Yust
Keyword(s):  
Internal Control ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Internal Controls ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Material Weakness ◽  
Control Quality ◽  
Interest Income ◽  
Upside Risk ◽  
And Performance

Using a sample of bank-years from 2005 to 2017, we examine the effect of internal control quality on future risk-taking and performance. We find that banks that disclose a material weakness in internal controls have higher risk-taking and worse performance in the future, including having a higher (lower) likelihood of experiencing large losses (gains). These findings suggest that weak controls increase (reduce) downside (upside) risk-taking or conversely that strong controls increase (reduce) upside (downside) risk-taking. Path analyses suggest that 22.3 to 43.7 percent of the effect of internal control quality on future performance is through risk-taking. Additionally, material weaknesses are negatively associated with total asset, loan, interest income, and non-interest income growth, suggesting that internal control quality affects both core and non-core activities of banks. Overall, results suggest that strong internal controls improve bank risk-taking, in part through asymmetrically reducing downside risk-taking while facilitating upside risk-taking, ultimately improving bank performance.

scholarly journals The disciplinary effect of subordinated debt on bank risk taking

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 117-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tu Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Risk Taking ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Subordinated Debt
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document