A Supply-Side Options Pricing Model for Explaining the Moment Risk Premia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
PeiLin Billy Hsieh
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-143
Author(s):  
Paré Daouda ◽  
Kassiénou Lamien ◽  
Blaise Somé ◽  
Youssouf Paré ◽  
Longin Somé

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Cruz Rambaud ◽  
Ana María Sánchez Pérez

Usually, traditional methods for investment project appraisal such as the net present value (hereinafter NPV) do not incorporate in their values the operational flexibility offered by including a real option included in the project. In this paper, real options, and more specifically the option to abandon, are analysed as a complement to cash flow sequence which quantifies the project. In this way, by considering the existing analogy with financial options, a mathematical expression is derived by using the binomial options pricing model. This methodology provides the value of the option to abandon the project within one, two, and in general n periods. Therefore, this paper aims to be a useful tool in determining the value of the option to abandon according to its residual value, thus making easier the control of the uncertainty element within the project.


2020 ◽  
Vol 277 ◽  
pp. 124031
Author(s):  
Jian Xue ◽  
Shengnan Zhao ◽  
Laijun Zhao ◽  
Di Zhu ◽  
Shuxin Mao

The most common approach in fitting option pricing models to market data is first to make an assumption about the underlying asset’s returns process and then develop an option pricing model for that process that is tested against market option prices. The returns process is estimated from historical data, option values are computed, and then compared against a cross-section of prices from the options market. Unfortunately, this often does not work well, and plainly it is inefficient in its use of the data. However, efforts to combine returns data from the asset market and prices from the options market into a single estimation have also not had much success. In this article, Chang, Cheng, and Fuh propose a new procedure to combine data from both markets in the estimation, in which options are assumed to be subject to random pricing noise relative to model values. The additional slack gives the estimator better ability to match prices in both markets. The article contrasts the performance of the full model approach with an approach that only uses stock prices or options prices to fit an option pricing model based on an underlying GARCH process. The value of the combined approach is demonstrated both theoretically as an asymptotic result in the model and also in a Monte Carlo simulation.


2003 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 103-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
JORGE R. SOBEHART ◽  
SEAN C. KEENAN

In this paper we introduce an options pricing model consistent with the level of uncertainty observed in the options market. By assuming that the price at which an option can be traded is intrinsically uncertain, either because of the inability to hedge continuously or because of errors in the estimation of the security's volatility and interest rates, random delays in the execution of orders or information deficiencies, we show that the Black-Scholes model produces a biased estimate of the expected value of tradable options. Information deficiencies lead to a call-put relationship that reduces to the standard call-put expression on average but shows random fluctuations consistent with the concept of market equilibrium. The same information deficiencies can contribute to the volatility skew that affects the Black-Scholes model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document