'A Critical Analysis of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Introducing Criminal Sanctions, Product-Liability Regime and Emerging Regulations on AI & Robotics'

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
vageesh sharma ◽  
Arjun Chatterjee
Author(s):  
Duncan Fairgrieve ◽  
Richard Goldberg

Section 4 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 provides a number of defences to liability which mirror those provided by Article 7 of Council Directive 85/374/EEC (the Product Liability Directive). By s 1(1), the Act and hence the defences must be construed so as to give effect to Article 7 and consistently with it. The defences cover such matters as:


Author(s):  
Simon Deakin ◽  
Zoe Adams

This chapter begins by tracing the evolution of product liability law in England and America. It then discusses the causes of action and components of liability. Liability evolved from an initial position in which the law of negligence played a minor role in compensating victims of dangerously defective products, thanks largely to the ‘privity of contract fallacy’. Donoghue v. Stevenson put an end to this and ushered in the modern, all-embracing duty of care as far as physical injury and property damage are concerned. With the adoption of Directive 85/374/EEC and its subsequent implementation in the form of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, a form of strict or ‘stricter’ liability based on the American model was incorporated into English law.


Tort Law ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 352-384
Author(s):  
Kirsty Horsey ◽  
Erika Rackley

This chapter discusses the ways in which liability for defective products is regulated in tort law and which is primarily regulated by statute. The chapter considers manufacturers’ liability in negligence and the problems claimants may encounter when trying to sue. This leads to a later development relating to product liability—the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) 1987—enacted to ensure better protection of consumers from defective goods by making producers strictly liable for harms caused by the products they market. However, a claimant may still claim in negligence due to the statutory limitations in relation to certain types of claim.


Author(s):  
Carol Brennan

This chapter discusses the law on product liability. Common law product liability is based upon the law of negligence. Beginning with the narrow ratio in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932), it further developed the concept of intermediate examination in Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1936). The relevant statute is the Consumer Protection Act 1987, passed in response to a European Union Directive. This introduces strict liability, when a defective product causes damage. The CPA establishes a hierarchy of possible defendants beginning with the producer. Defences under the CPA include the ‘development risks’ defence to protect scientific and technical innovation. If damage relates to quality or value, the only remedy will be in contract.


2012 ◽  
pp. 298-332
Author(s):  
Nicholas Ryder ◽  
Margaret Griffiths ◽  
Lachmi Singh

Author(s):  
Duncan Fairgrieve ◽  
Richard Goldberg

One of the most important and complex elements in many product liability actions is the establishment of a causative link between the allegedly defective product and the relevant damage. Indeed, the significance of causation cannot be overstated since, whether the claim is in negligence or under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, proof of causation will often lead to either a settlement or a successful claim.


1999 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Taylor

The 1985 European Communities Directive on Product Liability1aims to harmonise member State product liability rules and to improve the level of protection of victims by basing the liability of producers for physical injury and damage to personal goods on the proof that the victim's damage was caused by a defect in the product supplied. On 19 May 1998, ten years after the deadline for transposition, France finally enacted legislation incorporating the Directive into national law.2The Directive was incorporated into English law by Part I of the Consumer Protection Act 1987.


Author(s):  
Christian Witting

This chapter examines the provisions of tort law concerning product liability. It explains that a defendant can be held liable for a defective product that causes personal injuries or causes damage to property and that the liability for failure to take care in the manufacture of a product causing personal injury was established in Donoghue v Stevenson. The chapter discusses the limitations of the tort of negligence and suggests that claimants should bring their actions for defective products under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 because it does not require proof of fault.


1988 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Newdick

The European Directive on Product Liability introduces a new regime of strict product liability to the member states of the Community. Those injured by products may recover by showing that the product is “defective,” i.e., that it “does not provide the safety which a person is entitled to expect. …” The advantage of this approach for the individual is that liability turns on the existence of a defect alone. Unlike the law of Negligence, no question of foresight of the danger, or of the precautions taken to avoid it, arises for consideration. Strict product liability depends on the condition of the product, not the fault of its maker or supplier.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document